EVIDENCE OF HARM

[Guest guest]

EVIDENCE OF HARM

The IOM, NIH, CDC et al all publicly deny any and all harm of thimerosal.

This is a junk sicence for a medico-legal defence to the harm done to tens of

millions of young children for the past decades by vaccinating too many times

with toxic

vaccines and defying established science in so many vaccine related areas.

One of the most harmful practices was and still is the injection of thimerosal

into babies up to the age of two months.

This is not to say injecting the same vaccine into older children is good but we

have enough evidence to confirm that injecting toxic amounts of mercury into

very small

babies or the pregnant mother is provably harmful.

When this evidence comes not only from research much criticised but also from

those whose work is used to deny harm, it is time to say ENOUGH and to get the

toxins

out of our vaccines once and for all.

The young child of two months has been the canary showing toxic harm for far too

long.

A typical authority review might say

Studies do not demonstrate a link between thimerosal-containing vaccines and

ASD, and the pharmacokinetics of ethylmercury make such an association less

likely.

Epidemiologic studies thatsupport a link demonstrated significant design flaws

that invalidate their conclusions. Evidence does not support a change in

the standard of

practice with regard to administration of thimerosal-containing vaccines in

areas of the world where they are used.

Explaining why today, we still insist on killing and harming babies

A typical robust and good authoritative research article might conclude:

With the possible exception of tics, there was no evidence that thimerosal

exposure via DTP/DT vaccines causes neurodevelopmental disorders.

Going against even what they discovered but couldn't report in their ABSTRACT.

PEDIATRICS Vol. 114 No. 3 September 2004, pp. 584-591 for example

Hg exposure was « created » from the age in days at the 3 DTP/DT doses as

follows: 

Hg exposure = ((183 – age at dose 1) + (183 – age at dose 2) + (183 – age

at dose 3))/40

When a dose was not given or was given later than 183 days of age, for the

purpose of the above calculation, the age was set to 183 days

Again meaning that if you wait until just over 6 months you get no mercury

exposure even if you have nine mercury vaccines at once on that day. Complete

mathematical

and scientific nonsense.

Simple logic can lead to WRONG conclusions and here the whole basis of the

research relies on false logic.

The UK government call this research robust and evidence of harm from other

research as flawed.

A complete inversion of truth just as much as the IMPOSSIBILITY in this study to

inject mercury after the age of 6 months into a human.

The governments and regulators of both USA and UK distancing themselves from

known harm from thimerosal vaccines for many decades by putting JUNK science as

their MARKER of quality to show non-harm from chemically the most toxic of all

elements.

The research may be robust to the government simply because it enables proof

that thimerosal does not cause extra cases of autism.

The research does have good results and are robust but they are careful not to

publicise these robust results proving thimerosal is harmful and their

discussion shows

huge gaps, mistakes and errors of schoolboy science.

The mathematics of their equation may have some merit in an anecdotal review of

what the exposure is but is a complete misfabrication of exact science and all

it

represents.

England in 2010 has an autism rate equal or worse than USA and this paper shows

exactly why this is so, for those who care to read and can understand.

The harm started coincidentally but not causally related to the vaccination

policy in USA.

In USA, the 1991 introduction of Hep B mercury vaccines at one day not only sent

the autism numbers spiralling upwards but meant that often parents who were

against

vaccines had their child vaccinated and thought their wishes to abstain were

being honoured.

In the UK the advanced vaccine schedule in 1990 meant that by 6 months there was

no difference in mercury vaccine exposure between USA infants and UK infants.

Exactly when HARM is done. The delayed extent of the harm taking months and

years and showed by increasing ill health to those who have suffered. Harm more

often

to boys. Both the timing, delay and the target for harm matching the known

toxicity of mercury.

There is too much wrong or left out or not recorded accurately to go through all

the errors here but the effect of the accelerated vaccine schedule shows by

their

equation, exposure to mercury whereas a mathematical model for the previous

vaccine schedule would show mercury being taken out of the body every time a

mercury

vaccine was given. Obvious scientific nonsense.

And mathematical NONSENSE.

And the conclusion that THIMEROSAL is not harmful in the light of one child in a

hundred in the UK with autism is INCORRECT, FRAUDULENT and MISLEADING.

Using faulty mathematics to prove a TOXIC substance is NON-TOXIC is shameful and

the fact that governments and regulators et al. take this as robust and good

science

is APALLING not just for their credibility but for the continued injection of

mercury vaccines into the foetus and future harmed or dead babies.

Time to put THIMEROSAL to bed and give children SAFE vaccines, just like dad

had.

We KNOW of other causes for autism and some not needing mercury but to leave in

vaccines chemicals both neurotoxic and carcinogenic is no way to combat

« diseases » and « ill health ».

EVIDENCE OF HARM