Rotavirus vaccine not tied to bowel problem: study

[Guest guest]

http://health.yahoo.net/news/s/nm/rotavirus-vaccine-not-tied-to-bowel-problem-st\

udy#.TwYVsyX1JiM.email

---

This message was sent by maurine_meleck@... via http://addthis.com.

Please note that AddThis does not verify email addresses.

Make sharing easier with the AddThis Toolbar:

http://www.addthis.com/go/toolbar-em

To stop receiving any emails from AddThis please visit:

http://www.addthis.com/privacy/email-opt-out?e=M2R7IHYOTAJ.Fl8HUQBZHVEaThwQDFEC

in your web browser.

[Guest guest]

But this vaccine is given orally instead of being injected. What is the chemical reaction to the immune system for an oral vaccine versus an injected vaccine.  And I believe that this vaccine is not a live virus correct? Wayne From: EOHarm [mailto:EOHarm ] On Behalf Of maurine_meleck@...Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2012 3:27 PMTo: EOHarm Subject: Rotavirus vaccine not tied to bowel problem: study http://health.yahoo.net/news/s/nm/rotavirus-vaccine-not-tied-to-bowel-problem-study#.TwYVsyX1JiM.email---This message was sent by maurine_meleck@... via http://addthis.com. Please note that AddThis does not verify email addresses.Make sharing easier with the AddThis Toolbar: http://www.addthis.com/go/toolbar-emTo stop receiving any emails from AddThis please visit: http://www.addthis.com/privacy/email-opt-out?e=M2R7IHYOTAJ.Fl8HUQBZHVEaThwQDFEC in your web browser.

[Guest guest]

I don't have the answers to this, but recall the dangers of the oral polio vaccine.

To: EOHarm Cc: 'Maurine Meleck' Sent: Thursday, January 5, 2012 4:42 PMSubject: RE: Rotavirus vaccine not tied to bowel problem: study

But this vaccine is given orally instead of being injected.

What is the chemical reaction to the immune system for an oral vaccine versus an injected vaccine. And I believe that this vaccine is not a live virus correct?

Wayne

From: EOHarm [mailto:EOHarm ] On Behalf Of maurine_meleck@...Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2012 3:27 PMTo: EOHarm Subject: Rotavirus vaccine not tied to bowel problem: study

http://health.yahoo.net/news/s/nm/rotavirus-vaccine-not-tied-to-bowel-problem-study#.TwYVsyX1JiM.email---This message was sent by maurine_meleck@... via http://addthis.com. Please note that AddThis does not verify email addresses.Make sharing easier with the AddThis Toolbar: http://www.addthis.com/go/toolbar-emTo stop receiving any emails from AddThis please visit: http://www.addthis.com/privacy/email-opt-out?e=M2R7IHYOTAJ.Fl8HUQBZHVEaThwQDFEC in your web browser.

[Guest guest]

Dear Wayne Rohde and ALL,

1. Do NOT believe all that you read -- in the clinical

trials, there was an excess of intussusception cases

in those given the vaccine as opposed to those NOT

given it -- but, because of the relatively small " size "

of the trials, increased cases were not statistically

significant at the P < 0.05 level (95% level) but were

significant at the P < 0.10 level. If the vaccines were

effective in preventing rotavirus infection, then one

would EXPECT that there should have been fewer cases

in the vaccinated population -- which was NOT the case!

2. Unfortunately, the two vaccines are LIVE rotavirus

vaccines that, as you note, are given orally, and

which not only infect those inoculated with them but,

like the LIVE polio viruses vaccines (discontinued in

the late 1990s because of the continual secondary

infections of others), also CAN infect those who come

into contact with the inoculees' fecal discharges.

3. Since the vaccines contain live viruses, they INFECT

every newborn given them -- many, if not most, are

infected to the point that they develop a clinical

case of diarrhea.

4. The two US-FDA licensed LIVE rotavirus vaccines are

Merck's genetically engineered RotaTeq (containing

several human-bovine[cow] hybridized viruses) and

GSK's Rotarix, which is a " weakened " human rotatirus

vaccine.

5. Besides intussusception, RotaTeq has been putatively

linked to cases of Kiawasaki's; and Rotarix has been

admittedly linked to a probable increase in the risk

of post-vaccination-pneumonia.

6. Based on a 1998 study [1], given the low, rapidly

decreasing incidence of native-strain clinical cases

in 1990s USA [bEFORE the first rotavirus vaccine,

Wyeth's RotaShield (a bioengineered human-monkey

hybrid live-virus vaccine], for the rotavirus vaccines

to be cost-effective to deploy for universal use in

the USA, the cost of administered vaccine would have

to be less than US$ 9.00/dose in 1998 or most certainly

less than US$ 20.00/dose today. But, as of 15 Dec

2011, the current prices for the FDA-licensed

vaccines were:

a. Rotavirus, Live, Oral, Pentavalent - RotaTeq® 00006-4047-41

10 pack - 1 dose 2mL tubes $59.76 (VFC program price)

$69.59 (whilesale price)

03/31/2012 Merck

200-2011-38200;

Rotavirus, Live, Oral, Pentavalent - RotaTeq® 00006-4047-20

25 pack – 1 dose 2mL tubes $59.760

$69.59; and

b. Rotavirus, Live, Oral, Oral - Rotarix® 58160-0854-52

10 pack - 1 dose vials $89.25

$102.50

03/31/2012 GlaxoKline

200-2011-38201,

prices that are 3-5 times the apparent break-even

price (or 6.6 to 11.3 times the 1998 price).

Bottomline:

1. These rotavirus vaccines infect all who are given them to

some degree;

2. They are obviously (to this writer at least) an INCREDIBLE

waste of U.S. healthcare dollars to increase the profits

of Merck, GSK, and the healthcare providers who sell and/

or administer these vaccines as well as,

3. In the case of RotaTeq, the vaccine introduces genetically

engineered LIVE rotaviruses (human-bovine hybrids) that

can, and have, infected supposedly human-rotavirus-immune

adults; and these hybrid rotaviruses are synthetic viruses

whose non-reversible long-term effects are NOT known and

will only become " obvious " (if anyone is unbiasedly

assessing them) in the USA in the mid-2100s at the earliest.

Hopefully, some of this information may be helpful to some

of you.

Regards,

Dr. King

http://www.dr-king.com

*******************************************

*The information provided in this email *

*and any attachment thereto is just that *

* -- information. *

* *

*It is not medical or legal advice and it *

*does not require any specific action or *

*actions. *

* *

*While the information is thought to be *

*accurate, no representation is made as *

*to the accuracy of the information posted*

*other than it is my best understanding of*

*the facts on the date that this email and*

*any attachments thereto are posted. *

* *

*Everyone should verify the accuracy of *

*the information provided for themselves *

*before acting on it. *

*******************************************

PS: The attached galley proof from an article in which

I am an author sheds some light on some of these issues.

[Note: If the rotaviruses were NOT linked to intussus-

ception, then there should have been some low level

of vaccine-linked VAERS reports of intussusception.]

Since the pre-release and early-release propaganda

from the healthcare establishment, which touted that,

unlike the withdrawn Wyeth RotaShield live rotavirus

vaccine, the Merck Rotateq live genetically engineered

rotavirus vaccine would NOT cause intussusception, the

initiall reporting of cases of intussusception to VAERS

was unequivocally suppressed over the level of reporting

that would have occurred had the vaccine providers been:

a) told nothing or,

as the clinical trials' data clearly indicated might

be the case, instructed to expect vaccine-related

cases of intussusception.

---------------------------------------------------------

[1] The cited 1998 paper was published in JAMA: " Cost-

effectiveness of a Rotavirus Immunization Program

for the United States " , JAMA 1998 May; 279:1371-76

by CDC researchers: Tucker AW, Haddix AC, Bresee JS,

et al.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Quoting Wayne Rohde :

> But this vaccine is given orally instead of being injected.

>

>

>

> What is the chemical reaction to the immune system for an oral vaccine versus

an injected

> vaccine. And I believe that this vaccine is not a live virus correct?

>

>

>

>

>

> Wayne

>

>

>

> From: EOHarm [mailto:EOHarm ] On Behalf Of

> maurine_meleck@...

> Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2012 3:27 PM

> To: EOHarm

> Subject: Rotavirus vaccine not tied to bowel problem: study

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

http://health.yahoo.net/news/s/nm/rotavirus-vaccine-not-tied-to-bowel-problem-st\

udy#.TwYVsyX1JiM.email

>

> ---

> This message was sent by maurine_meleck@...

<mailto:maurine_meleck%40yahoo.com> via

> http://addthis.com. Please note that AddThis does not verify email addresses.

>

> Make sharing easier with the AddThis Toolbar:

http://www.addthis.com/go/toolbar-em

>

> To stop receiving any emails from AddThis please visit:

>

http://www.addthis.com/privacy/email-opt-out?e=M2R7IHYOTAJ.Fl8HUQBZHVEaThwQDFEC

in your web

> browser.

>

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

Thank you Dr. King.

I appreciate your detailed analysis of what is " behind the curtain " .

To me, the original document was just missing something. And it appears

that it was a lot of something.

Wayne

Rotavirus vaccine not tied to bowel problem: study

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

http://health.yahoo.net/news/s/nm/rotavirus-vaccine-not-tied-to-bowel-proble

m-study#.TwYVsyX1JiM.email

>

> ---

> This message was sent by maurine_meleck@...

<mailto:maurine_meleck%40yahoo.com> via

> http://addthis.com. Please note that AddThis does not verify email

addresses.

>

> Make sharing easier with the AddThis Toolbar:

http://www.addthis.com/go/toolbar-em

>

> To stop receiving any emails from AddThis please visit:

>

http://www.addthis.com/privacy/email-opt-out?e=M2R7IHYOTAJ.Fl8HUQBZHVEaThwQD

FEC in your web

> browser.

>

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

Dear Dr. King,I always LOVE your detailed explanations! As usual, you have covered all the 'key' points thoroughly! Thanks for the countless hours of research, dedication and the pursuit to educate so many regarding the ongoing demise of our most important commodity...our children and their health. Your sacrificial efforts can never be repaid! All I can say is....Thank you! T. (Indiana) " And he said unto me, My grace is sufficient for thee: for my strength is made perfect in weakness. Most gladly therefore will I rather glory in my infirmities, that the power of Christ may rest upon me. Therefore I take pleasure in infirmities, in reproaches, in necessities, in persecutions, in distresses for Christ's sake: for when I am weak, then am I strong. " II Corinthians 12:9-10 From: EOHarm [mailto:EOHarm ] On Behalf Of G. KingSent: Thursday, January 05, 2012 7:54 PMTo: EOHarm ; Wayne RohdeCc: 'Maurine Meleck'Subject: RE: Rotavirus vaccine not tied to bowel problem: study Dear Wayne Rohde and ALL,1. Do NOT believe all that you read -- in the clinical trials, there was an excess of intussusception cases in those given the vaccine as opposed to those NOT given it -- but, because of the relatively small " size " of the trials, increased cases were not statistically significant at the P < 0.05 level (95% level) but were significant at the P < 0.10 level. If the vaccines wereeffective in preventing rotavirus infection, then one would EXPECT that there should have been fewer casesin the vaccinated population -- which was NOT the case!2. Unfortunately, the two vaccines are LIVE rotavirus vaccines that, as you note, are given orally, and which not only infect those inoculated with them but, like the LIVE polio viruses vaccines (discontinued in the late 1990s because of the continual secondaryinfections of others), also CAN infect those who come into contact with the inoculees' fecal discharges. 3. Since the vaccines contain live viruses, they INFECTevery newborn given them -- many, if not most, are infected to the point that they develop a clinical case of diarrhea.4. The two US-FDA licensed LIVE rotavirus vaccines are Merck's genetically engineered RotaTeq (containing several human-bovine[cow] hybridized viruses) and GSK's Rotarix, which is a " weakened " human rotatirusvaccine.5. Besides intussusception, RotaTeq has been putatively linked to cases of Kiawasaki's; and Rotarix has been admittedly linked to a probable increase in the risk of post-vaccination-pneumonia.6. Based on a 1998 study [1], given the low, rapidly decreasing incidence of native-strain clinical cases in 1990s USA [bEFORE the first rotavirus vaccine, Wyeth's RotaShield (a bioengineered human-monkey hybrid live-virus vaccine], for the rotavirus vaccinesto be cost-effective to deploy for universal use in the USA, the cost of administered vaccine would haveto be less than US$ 9.00/dose in 1998 or most certainlyless than US$ 20.00/dose today. But, as of 15 Dec 2011, the current prices for the FDA-licensed vaccines were: a. Rotavirus, Live, Oral, Pentavalent - RotaTeq® 00006-4047-41 10 pack - 1 dose 2mL tubes $59.76 (VFC program price)$69.59 (whilesale price)03/31/2012 Merck 200-2011-38200; Rotavirus, Live, Oral, Pentavalent - RotaTeq® 00006-4047-2025 pack – 1 dose 2mL tubes $59.760 $69.59; and b. Rotavirus, Live, Oral, Oral - Rotarix® 58160-0854-52 10 pack - 1 dose vials $89.25 $102.50 03/31/2012 GlaxoKline 200-2011-38201, prices that are 3-5 times the apparent break-even price (or 6.6 to 11.3 times the 1998 price).Bottomline:1. These rotavirus vaccines infect all who are given them to some degree;2. They are obviously (to this writer at least) an INCREDIBLE waste of U.S. healthcare dollars to increase the profits of Merck, GSK, and the healthcare providers who sell and/or administer these vaccines as well as, 3. In the case of RotaTeq, the vaccine introduces genetically engineered LIVE rotaviruses (human-bovine hybrids) that can, and have, infected supposedly human-rotavirus-immune adults; and these hybrid rotaviruses are synthetic viruseswhose non-reversible long-term effects are NOT known andwill only become " obvious " (if anyone is unbiasedly assessing them) in the USA in the mid-2100s at the earliest. Hopefully, some of this information may be helpful to some of you.Regards,Dr. Kinghttp://www.dr-king.com********************************************The information provided in this email **and any attachment thereto is just that ** -- information. ** **It is not medical or legal advice and it **does not require any specific action or * *actions. * * **While the information is thought to be **accurate, no representation is made as **to the accuracy of the information posted**other than it is my best understanding of**the facts on the date that this email and**any attachments thereto are posted. ** **Everyone should verify the accuracy of **the information provided for themselves **before acting on it. ********************************************PS: The attached galley proof from an article in whichI am an author sheds some light on some of these issues.[Note: If the rotaviruses were NOT linked to intussus-ception, then there should have been some low level of vaccine-linked VAERS reports of intussusception.]Since the pre-release and early-release propaganda from the healthcare establishment, which touted that, unlike the withdrawn Wyeth RotaShield live rotavirus vaccine, the Merck Rotateq live genetically engineered rotavirus vaccine would NOT cause intussusception, the initiall reporting of cases of intussusception to VAERSwas unequivocally suppressed over the level of reportingthat would have occurred had the vaccine providers been:a) told nothing or, as the clinical trials' data clearly indicated mightbe the case, instructed to expect vaccine-related cases of intussusception. ---------------------------------------------------------[1] The cited 1998 paper was published in JAMA: " Cost-effectiveness of a Rotavirus Immunization Programfor the United States " , JAMA 1998 May; 279:1371-76by CDC researchers: Tucker AW, Haddix AC, Bresee JS,et al. ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Quoting Wayne Rohde :> But this vaccine is given orally instead of being injected.> > > > What is the chemical reaction to the immune system for an oral vaccine versus an injected> vaccine. And I believe that this vaccine is not a live virus correct?> > > > > > Wayne> > > > From: EOHarm [mailto:EOHarm ] On Behalf Of> maurine_meleck@...> Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2012 3:27 PM> To: EOHarm > Subject: Rotavirus vaccine not tied to bowel problem: study> > > > > > > >http://health.yahoo.net/news/s/nm/rotavirus-vaccine-not-tied-to-bowel-problem-study#.TwYVsyX1JiM.email> > ---> This message was sent by maurine_meleck@... <mailto:maurine_meleck%40yahoo.com> via> http://addthis.com. Please note that AddThis does not verify email addresses.> > Make sharing easier with the AddThis Toolbar: http://www.addthis.com/go/toolbar-em> > To stop receiving any emails from AddThis please visit:> http://www.addthis.com/privacy/email-opt-out?e=M2R7IHYOTAJ.Fl8HUQBZHVEaThwQDFEC in your web> browser.> > > >

[Guest guest]

Dearest ,

Glad you liked my response.

Ate the last of your divine divinity candy this

morning as a breakfast treat.

Thank you for all you do to keep me focused and,

from time to time, provide little bits of joy

that flavor my daily existence.

With care,

G.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Quoting Troutman :

> Dear Dr. King,

>

> I always LOVE your detailed explanations! As usual, you have covered all

> the 'key' points thoroughly! Thanks for the countless hours of research,

> dedication and the pursuit to educate so many regarding the ongoing demise

> of our most important commodity...our children and their health. Your

> sacrificial efforts can never be repaid!

>

> All I can say is....Thank you!

>

>

>

> T. (Indiana)

>

> " And he said unto me, My grace is sufficient for thee: for my strength is

> made perfect in weakness. Most gladly therefore will I rather glory in my

> infirmities, that the power of Christ may rest upon me. Therefore I take

> pleasure in infirmities, in reproaches, in necessities, in persecutions, in

> distresses for Christ's sake: for when I am weak, then am I strong. " II

> Corinthians 12:9-10

>

>

>

> From: EOHarm [mailto:EOHarm ] On Behalf Of

> G. King

> Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2012 7:54 PM

> To: EOHarm ; Wayne Rohde

> Cc: 'Maurine Meleck'

> Subject: RE: Rotavirus vaccine not tied to bowel problem: study

>

>

>

>

>

> Dear Wayne Rohde and ALL,

>

> 1. Do NOT believe all that you read -- in the clinical

> trials, there was an excess of intussusception cases

> in those given the vaccine as opposed to those NOT

> given it -- but, because of the relatively small " size "

> of the trials, increased cases were not statistically

> significant at the P < 0.05 level (95% level) but were

> significant at the P < 0.10 level. If the vaccines were

> effective in preventing rotavirus infection, then one

> would EXPECT that there should have been fewer cases

> in the vaccinated population -- which was NOT the case!

> 2. Unfortunately, the two vaccines are LIVE rotavirus

> vaccines that, as you note, are given orally, and

> which not only infect those inoculated with them but,

> like the LIVE polio viruses vaccines (discontinued in

> the late 1990s because of the continual secondary

> infections of others), also CAN infect those who come

> into contact with the inoculees' fecal discharges.

> 3. Since the vaccines contain live viruses, they INFECT

> every newborn given them -- many, if not most, are

> infected to the point that they develop a clinical

> case of diarrhea.

> 4. The two US-FDA licensed LIVE rotavirus vaccines are

> Merck's genetically engineered RotaTeq (containing

> several human-bovine[cow] hybridized viruses) and

> GSK's Rotarix, which is a " weakened " human rotatirus

> vaccine.

> 5. Besides intussusception, RotaTeq has been putatively

> linked to cases of Kiawasaki's; and Rotarix has been

> admittedly linked to a probable increase in the risk

> of post-vaccination-pneumonia.

> 6. Based on a 1998 study [1], given the low, rapidly

> decreasing incidence of native-strain clinical cases

> in 1990s USA [bEFORE the first rotavirus vaccine,

> Wyeth's RotaShield (a bioengineered human-monkey

> hybrid live-virus vaccine], for the rotavirus vaccines

> to be cost-effective to deploy for universal use in

> the USA, the cost of administered vaccine would have

> to be less than US$ 9.00/dose in 1998 or most certainly

> less than US$ 20.00/dose today. But, as of 15 Dec

> 2011, the current prices for the FDA-licensed

> vaccines were:

> a. Rotavirus, Live, Oral, Pentavalent - RotaTeqR 00006-4047-41

> 10 pack - 1 dose 2mL tubes $59.76 (VFC program price)

> $69.59 (whilesale price)

> 03/31/2012 Merck

> 200-2011-38200;

> Rotavirus, Live, Oral, Pentavalent - RotaTeqR 00006-4047-20

> 25 pack - 1 dose 2mL tubes $59.760

> $69.59; and

> b. Rotavirus, Live, Oral, Oral - RotarixR 58160-0854-52

> 10 pack - 1 dose vials $89.25

> $102.50

> 03/31/2012 GlaxoKline

> 200-2011-38201,

> prices that are 3-5 times the apparent break-even

> price (or 6.6 to 11.3 times the 1998 price).

>

> Bottomline:

> 1. These rotavirus vaccines infect all who are given them to

> some degree;

> 2. They are obviously (to this writer at least) an INCREDIBLE

> waste of U.S. healthcare dollars to increase the profits

> of Merck, GSK, and the healthcare providers who sell and/

> or administer these vaccines as well as,

> 3. In the case of RotaTeq, the vaccine introduces genetically

> engineered LIVE rotaviruses (human-bovine hybrids) that

> can, and have, infected supposedly human-rotavirus-immune

> adults; and these hybrid rotaviruses are synthetic viruses

> whose non-reversible long-term effects are NOT known and

> will only become " obvious " (if anyone is unbiasedly

> assessing them) in the USA in the mid-2100s at the earliest.

>

> Hopefully, some of this information may be helpful to some

> of you.

>

> Regards,

>

> Dr. King

> http://www.dr-king.com

>

> *******************************************

> *The information provided in this email *

> *and any attachment thereto is just that *

> * -- information. *

> * *

> *It is not medical or legal advice and it *

> *does not require any specific action or *

> *actions. *

> * *

> *While the information is thought to be *

> *accurate, no representation is made as *

> *to the accuracy of the information posted*

> *other than it is my best understanding of*

> *the facts on the date that this email and*

> *any attachments thereto are posted. *

> * *

> *Everyone should verify the accuracy of *

> *the information provided for themselves *

> *before acting on it. *

> *******************************************

>

> PS: The attached galley proof from an article in which

> I am an author sheds some light on some of these issues.

> [Note: If the rotaviruses were NOT linked to intussus-

> ception, then there should have been some low level

> of vaccine-linked VAERS reports of intussusception.]

>

> Since the pre-release and early-release propaganda

> from the healthcare establishment, which touted that,

> unlike the withdrawn Wyeth RotaShield live rotavirus

> vaccine, the Merck Rotateq live genetically engineered

> rotavirus vaccine would NOT cause intussusception, the

> initiall reporting of cases of intussusception to VAERS

> was unequivocally suppressed over the level of reporting

> that would have occurred had the vaccine providers been:

> a) told nothing or,

> as the clinical trials' data clearly indicated might

> be the case, instructed to expect vaccine-related

> cases of intussusception.

>

> ---------------------------------------------------------

> [1] The cited 1998 paper was published in JAMA: " Cost-

> effectiveness of a Rotavirus Immunization Program

> for the United States " , JAMA 1998 May; 279:1371-76

> by CDC researchers: Tucker AW, Haddix AC, Bresee JS,

> et al.

>

> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

>

> Quoting Wayne Rohde <wrohde@... <mailto:wrohde%40comcast.net> >:

>

> > But this vaccine is given orally instead of being injected.

> >

> >

> >

> > What is the chemical reaction to the immune system for an oral vaccine

> versus an injected

> > vaccine. And I believe that this vaccine is not a live virus correct?

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Wayne

> >

> >

> >

> > From: EOHarm <mailto:EOHarm%40yahoogroups.com>

> [mailto:EOHarm <mailto:EOHarm%40yahoogroups.com> ] On Behalf

> Of

> > maurine_meleck@... <mailto:maurine_meleck%40yahoo.com>

> > Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2012 3:27 PM

> > To: EOHarm <mailto:EOHarm%40yahoogroups.com>

> > Subject: Rotavirus vaccine not tied to bowel problem: study

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> http://health.yahoo.net/news/s/nm/rotavirus-vaccine-not-tied-to-bowel-proble

> m-study#.TwYVsyX1JiM.email

> >

> > ---

> > This message was sent by maurine_meleck@...

> <mailto:maurine_meleck%40yahoo.com> <mailto:maurine_meleck%40yahoo.com> via

> > http://addthis.com. Please note that AddThis does not verify email

> addresses.

> >

> > Make sharing easier with the AddThis Toolbar:

> http://www.addthis.com/go/toolbar-em

> >

> > To stop receiving any emails from AddThis please visit:

> >

> http://www.addthis.com/privacy/email-opt-out?e=M2R7IHYOTAJ.Fl8HUQBZHVEaThwQD

> FEC in your web

> > browser.

> >

> >

> >

> >

>

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

In their world "omission" is not a crime.

TZ

"Those with money and power will always be able to manipulate those who have more aspirations then resources" WagnerUSA today 4/9/08

Subject: RE: Rotavirus vaccine not tied to bowel problem: studyTo: "' G. King'" , EOHarm Cc: "'Maurine Meleck'" Date: Friday, January 6, 2012, 1:20 AM

Thank you Dr. King.I appreciate your detailed analysis of what is "behind the curtain".To me, the original document was just missing something. And it appearsthat it was a lot of something.Wayne Rotavirus vaccine not tied to bowel problem: study> > > > > > > >http://health.yahoo.net/news/s/nm/rotavirus-vaccine-not-tied-to-bowel-problem-study#.TwYVsyX1JiM.email> > ---> This message was sent by maurine_meleck@...<mailto:maurine_meleck%40yahoo.com> via> http://addthis.com. Please note that AddThis does not verify emailaddresses.> > Make sharing easier with the AddThis Toolbar:http://www.addthis.com/go/toolbar-em> > To stop receiving any emails from AddThis please visit:>http://www.addthis.com/privacy/email-opt-out?e=M2R7IHYOTAJ.Fl8HUQBZHVEaThwQDFEC in your web> browser.> > > >