Guest guest Posted January 2, 2012 Report Share Posted January 2, 2012 PINK DISEASE The history of Pink Disease is an ongoing saga of mans' MEDICAL incompetence on a wide front. Yes, cases regularly turn up even TODAY. Earlier this year in 2011the opposition side (mercury is good for you etc) provided convincing proof yet again that mercury is non-toxic, protective of the heart and an essential chemical for your mouth, vaccines, food and living environment. A complete cover up of the KNOWN? REAL and LARGE harm it is doing on an increasing scale. Well not quite like this but in some ways worse. Grandjean et al presenting evidence of non-harm is surprising as Grandjean himself has been criticised for insisting the Faroes folk had neurological problems from their intake of mercury polluted fish. The real advances are made in showing increasing knowledge of the harm of mercury and not trying to undo science from a thousand years ago which knew even then that mercury takes peoples minds away. Modern science tells us that it can stop our heart dead in its tracks. Modern science of nearly a century ago that is. Dr W G Wyllie for example back in 1930 with his CASE 7 patient. A boy of 18 months who suddenly died. He had been perfectly well until a month before his admission to hospital when he regressed in every way. The child was diagnosed as a Pinks Baby and on autopsy the findings were INTERESTING. The only nerve in which degeneration was found was the vagus. Today this careful work and observation is chilling: We know that MERCURY is the cause of Pinks Disease and that mercury degenerates nerves. We know often as here that the mercury goes for the heart muscle out of all proportions to other muscles. Steedmans Teething powders we know from 1953 testimony in court by the maker have remained uunchanged since their formulation in 1812. They contained calomel a mercury compound which the makers themselves realised was killing little children for over a hundred years. Case 7 was just one example of dozens every year admitted but will include non fatal cases where regression of development stops short of death. No need here for a mercury vaccine to tip the toxicity over the top as drop of water might overflow a full cup. The role of mercury deaths was proved yet again by Warkany and Hubbard in 1948. A simple literature search shows this was known back in 1874 or so when a doctor complained of all the dead baby bodies after taking teething powders. A chemical analysis clearly showing calomel present in the mix that was killing. A pity when clear INDFICATIONS of harm as here that we had to wait more than 75 years watching thousands die from mercury poisoning and doctors doing nothing except DEVELOP more TOXIC mercury compounds that work at much smaller levels of exposure. THIMEROSAL developed more than 50 years after an almost NON-TOXIC mercury compound was known to be killing in massive numbers otherwise healthy infants. Sad in 2011 top scientists still seek to protect mercury and expose the world to a VERY TOXIC material. The only question I would ask: If experts can be so stupid over known harm of TOXIC THIMEROSAL et al what chance for ASPARTAME, NUCLEAR POWER pollution, GMO using SV40, E Coli and Bt toxins et al? PINK DISEASE Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.