NO Mystery over mercury toxicity

[Guest guest]

TOXICITY of MERCURY

NO MYSTERY

Mercury is both toxic and is exposed to

us by regulators, government and industry INCOMPETENCE.

T W son and L Magos produced a 50

page article on mercury toxicity which gives a reasonable overview of

our knowledge on this very toxic metal. Critical (not so critical)

Review of Mercury Toxicology 2006.

It is a valuable resource but needs to

taken as a source for expansion, checking and for addition of less

palatable knowledge we have of mercury's ability to take away human

minds..

Therfore it does have sever and near

FATAL shortcomings.

I could see no references to the work

of Professor Boyd Haley arguably the leading expert on mercury

today. Also the mercury work of the Geier family or any references to

the amateur but revolutionary work of many researchers seriously

concerned with mercury exposure and modern illness – Bernard et al

and SAFE minds etc.

In fact the tone of the aritcle is one

of apology and denial of mercury harm based on no real evidence

except that of more modern research flying in the face of old

established facts. Mercury is indeed VERY VERY VERY toxic.

That is I repeat not to belittle the

monumental effort and work that went into the publication but that

the worst case scenario has been left out and the best case scenario

represented is provably dangerously optimistic about lack of harm.

For example:

Mercurous mercury

Little information is available on the

disposition of mercury after exposure they say. This ignores work

done on Pinks Disease and the tens of thousands who died from what is

now recognised as mercury toxicity that occurred from 1812 through to

1953 and despite denials still occurs spasmodically today. The amount

of knowledge both published and in private files must of necessity be

immense. And we have clear ideas about disposition:

For example a 1930 report by Dr Wyllie

speaks of damage only to the vagus nerve out of all those other

nerves in the body. A valuable and important action not referred to

probably from lack of knowledge of the authors than deliberate

omission.

This only emphasises both the

limitations of world experts over even people in the general

population whose only ability is to reflect and read the voluminous

scientific literature.

The mechanism of action is not known,

Magos and son say. An oft repeated sign of almost total

ignorance on mercury.

They simply mention hypersensitivity.

This ignores simple science that any exposure will be reflected by an

uptake throughout the body. May be hypersensitivity but those 499 out

of 500 may not have recognisable signs of Pinks Disease but may have

other clinical signs and illnesses and in any event carry a mercury

burden for life. Every person taking teething powders was TOXIFIED.

The limit of 1 in 500 simply represents man's ignorance to recognise

harm. The report for example of small amounts of teething powder

taking out in one slurp all of the soft gum tissue in the mouth of

the 3 month to 1 year old child after mercury exposure is asing of

the lack of insight of doctors to a patients demise and death. Harm

from teething powder specifically IGNORED despite COMMON SENSE.

Reiterated today so often. My child was perfectly well for hundreds

of days but the sdame day as a mercury exposure he or she stopped

talking IMMEDIATELY.

Confusion is evident in this article

(from the researchers) showing variously increasing harm from

increasing exposure, as well as the same toxic result regardless of

exposure to the most disturbing and recent one of increasing

intelligence et al from increasing mercury exposure.

And despite modern efforts to place

ethyl mercury compounds like THIMEROSAL in a different less toxic

category to the immensely toxic methyl form even the authors are

forced back to the conclusions that ethyl mercury toxicity is almost

surely very similar to that of ethyl mercury compounds.

Simply put it is clear that the element

is so toxic that for many exposures the amount for example of

fillings makes not a scrap of difference whether you have one or

thirty; your body is over toxified and you rely on miraculous powers

of the body to obviate harm and not on machinations of EPA, FDA or

CDC standards of no effect levels to save us. Or for that matter

apologists that argue science tells us this or that compound or

exposure is of no concern.

The tone of the report is depressing

when at every final analysis the same excuse is laid down. Despite

years of research on mercury harm no clear answer has arisen.

Rather like the old days of acrodynia

from 1812 through to 1953 when mercury harm was clear, the evidence

for example of mercury involvement at regular intervals was sidelined

just as Magos and son today write off harm from vaccines with

unnecessary mercury and unnessary dental work with mercury. The

concluding remarks:

MERCURIAL MYSTERIES

The team concludes that a great deal

needs to understood while not understanding that mercury harm has

been with us for thousands of years, is still here and cannot be

denied by IGNORANCE, DENIAL or as here claiming if we can't explain

mechanisms the danger is ABSENT.

Dangers are much higher if we dont have

answers. They cannot be ignored simply from mans ignorance. It is

abundantly clear that many other illnesses went in tandem with

acrodynia and disappeared coincidentally after removing mercury from

teething powders. Sadly new illnesses came into prominence as toxic

mercury was replaced with carcinogenic replacements.

But there is no mercurial mystery.

Mercury is VERY VERY VERY TOXIC

Mercury exposure at any level and from

any source is harming us

And mercury harm cannot be denied by

research undoing the careful work of years ago. Mercury harm cannot

be ignored by deliberate omission (Geier, Bernard, Haley, Lorscheider

etc etc) or by not knowing of the literature of mercury harm (Dr

Wyllie 1930 etc etc)

There is no place for mercury in

medical usage except to DELIBERATELY HARM the population and KILL

some of them.

TOXICITY of MERCURY