Guest guest Posted March 21, 2000 Report Share Posted March 21, 2000 It's " Nambudripad's Allergy Elimination technique " He tested all my acupuncture points and said I had candida. I even told him that I had a stool test and a candida antibody test that both came back negative and he said you can get false negatives. He is using NAET to clear my food allergies. >From: tallmommy@... >Reply-candidiasisonelist >candidiasisonelist >Subject: NAET >Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2000 17:05:38 EST > >: >What is a NAET? >Crystal > >In a message dated 3/21/00 2:34:10 PM Central Standard Time, >gadtnd@... writes: > ><< a Chiropractor who did NAET on me. >> ______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 7, 2000 Report Share Posted April 7, 2000 Has anyone heard of NAET for treating allergies? Good or bad? Pam Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 16, 2000 Report Share Posted April 16, 2000 All, This description of NAET sounds a bit like the " meridian stress " testing that I got a few weeks ago. Some of you might recall that I finally found a doctor who would give me AP (and not laugh about it!) but that I was a bit uncomfortable with some of her " alternative " ideas. One of the things that has made me most uncomfortable was a " nutrionist " in her office that she refered me to. This guy did the " meridian stress " test using a computer. He touched this pen-like device that was attached to his computer to different points on my hands and feet (supposed the energy channels (qi?) in Chinese medicine). Through this, he could supposedly determine what parts of me were in or out of balance. The results were that my joints were very out of balance, my liver was slightly out of balance and that I had allergies (this made my doctor put me on a regimen for fixing leaky gut). Interesting I guess except that this guy knew I had RA and the allergy thing was on my information sheet, so I am skeptical.And in my CBC my liver tests were all normal, so I don't know about the liver thing. But anyhow, the clincher is that he had these little vials of supplements that he placed on a platform attached to the computer and then touched the relevant points on my hands and feet again, to determine if the supplement would " balance " it! So I bought some of these supplements and he said I should see results in 10 days - dumb me didn't ask what he meant by results. After about 3 weeks, I ran into him at the doctor's office while getting my IV's and told him I didn't feel any differently and he said it would take a lot longer than 3 weeks! So I reminded him of what he said earlier and he hemmed and hawed a bit and said well that was just best-case...which he didn't say the first time around. So you can see why I think this is all a bit of a scam. Now my doctor wants me to see him again to be tested for food allergies - sounds like the NAET except you say it's not for testing? It seems inconceivable to me that this gizmo can determine if I have allergies to specific foods.... Anyhow, anyone have a similar experience? I feel pretty stupid about this.... Regards, Quanyin9@... wrote: > I want to clear up some misconceptions about NAET. This is not primarily a > protocol to do allergy testing; it is rather a way to desensitize the patient > to a known allergen. NAET practitioners have small test vials of allergens > that range from prednisone to dust to eggs to bacteria. When a patient comes > for the treatment (unless you as the patient are seeing one of the very few > practitioners who has the $20,000 computer which can give you a pretty > comprehensive rundown on what substances weaken you) the practitioner uses > the little vials to do muscle testing or applied kenisiology. The protocol > calls for " clearing " of a certain 10 groups of food before you even get to > the. Let's assume you are " cleared " to the initial foods and you want to > start hypothetically prednisone. You would either have your practitioner > muscle test you (see if prednisone either as NAET vial or as the drug itself > weakens you), if you test " weak " you then hold the pred vial or pill in your > hand and a protocol treatment begins. This involves " activating " areas along > the spine and if your practitioner is an acupuncturist, you will then receive > a treatment, still holding the vial or pill, that includes liver three and > Large Intestine 4. You are then asked to stay away from the cleared > substance for 25 hours. I have seen this work wonders with cat hair, mold, > antibiotics, foods, etc. It is not a method to test for allergies, but to > clear them. > > Geoff, in regard to hair analysis, do you by chance mean Great Smokies lab > rather than Smokey Mountain lab. Great Smokies is one of the most > comprehensive labs that tests for a number of things that are rather > " alternative " such as intestinal permeability, parasites. allergens, etc. > > If you have any specific questions about NAET or even Great SMokies, feel > free to e-mail me, > > Melinda > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Free E-Cards, Screensavers, and Digital Pictures! > Corbis.com: > 1/3358/0/_/532797/_/955659509/ > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 16, 2000 Report Share Posted April 16, 2000 Hi ! The doctor I see first sent me to a naturopath, who did tests with a machine that sound pretty much the same as the one you have had. I saw her just before I saw the doctor and started on AP, so she did not have a medical history other than any information I was able to provide her with. She came up with a number of food intolerances, and prescribed a no dairy, no wheat, no wine, no chocolate, no onions or garlic, minimal fats and sugars diet for me, which I have now been on for two and a half months. She also spotted a goitre which her tests said was iodine deficiency and gave me drops for - it has improved in a big way over the past couple of months!! Unusually, she also tested medications on me to see which would work, and which would have side effects (she tested for methotrexate alternatives as well as different antibiotics according to AP). She didn't try to sell me a heap of other stuff - all I bought was the drops (which were cheap) - and didn't talk a lot of babble. Although I am usually pretty sceptical, I do feel better in myself now that I am on the diet (although I am herxing at the same time). No, I don't really understand why these tests are meant to work either, but I was impressed by the naturopath I saw. Maybe it all depends a bit on the practitioner??? I don't know really. Lara Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 17, 2000 Report Share Posted April 17, 2000 Hi Gloria, The naturopath didn't call the testing NAET, but had a brochure describing it as Bio-Electronic Functional Analysis. But it sounds like what you had done, with the pen-like device and substances being introduced into the electrical circuit. She used small vials of different substances, whether food substances or medications, at the same dosages as you would normally take them. She also made me take along all the medications I was currently taking, whether vitamins, contraceptive pill, herbs, supplements, or precriptions, to test them as well and to test other substances in conjunction with them. My goitre is what has improved in a big way. It is still too early to tell with the arthritis and pain. However, my general health has improved dramatically - no headaches in the time I've been on the diet (they used to be at least weekly), vastly improved digestive health (very regular and easy #2), and my pimples (at the age of 31!!) are also going. I will keep you informed as I go along. Because I am only in the early stages of AP it becomes difficult to tell what is due to diet, what is due to herxing, and what is just plain old RA. But I'm keeping my journal, so I should build up an overall picture. I'll let you know!! Lara Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 17, 2000 Report Share Posted April 17, 2000 Hello again Gloria, I forgot to say the results of my medication tests. For me, she said that plaquenil would be as effective as methotrexate (she did say the methotrexate worked well on suppressing my RA symptoms, but also said what organs were being affected by it), that minocycline should be effective, that clindamycin would also work, and that clindamycin IV's would be good. There were a number of other antibiotic options that her tests rejected in terms of their effectiveness, and she also said that sulfur drugs would be particularly bad for my system (so much for the salazopyrine!!). She also rejected the spices/herbs that the chinese medicine practitioner I had been seeing had given me, other than one bottle of pills (manufactured in China) that were for PMT that she did consider effecticve for me. All quite interesting! (I am not seeing the Chinese medicine practitioner now that I am on AP - one treatment protocol at a time is enough for me!!) I hope that this helps a little. It can all be very confusing (to me, anyway!!) Lara Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 25, 2000 Report Share Posted April 25, 2000 Hi Melinda! Geoff Crenshaw here. You wrote: Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2000 16:58:24 EDT From: Quanyin9@... Subject: NAET << I want to clear up some misconceptions about NAET. This is not primarily a protocol to do allergy testing; it is rather a way to desensitize the patient to a known allergen. NAET practitioners have small test vials of allergens that range from prednisone to dust to eggs to bacteria. When a patient comes for the treatment (unless you as the patient are seeing one of the very few practitioners who has the $20,000 computer which can give you a pretty comprehensive rundown on what substances weaken you) the practitioner uses the little vials to do muscle testing or applied kenisiology. >> This is contrary to my personal experience with NAET. Understand, my experience is limited to having visited two practioners over a period of several years in two different offices. However, both practioners used computers w/GSR (galvanic skin response) measurement input. >> calls for " clearing " of a certain 10 groups of food before you even get to the. Let's assume you are " cleared " to the initial foods and you want to start hypothetically prednisone. You would either have your practitioner muscle test you (see if prednisone either as NAET vial or as the drug itself weakens you), if you test " weak " you then hold the pred vial or pill in your hand and a protocol treatment begins. This involves " activating " areas along the spine and if your practitioner is an acupuncturist, you will then receive a treatment, still holding the vial or pill, that includes liver three and Large Intestine 4. You are then asked to stay away from the cleared substance for 25 hours. I have seen this work wonders with cat hair, mold, antibiotics, foods, etc. It is not a method to test for allergies, but to clear them. << Again, this is contrary to my experience, those of others whom I have spoken with and other with whom I have corresponded in far flung parts of the US who have seen various practioners (not the ones I have seen). Their experiences have precisely mimicked mine, i.e.: tested by computer using GSR input; tested for many different foods; tested for many chemicals; etc... My personal testing involved well in excess of 300 different items - not 10 - and included a wide variety of foods, environmental toxins, molds, pollens, danders, chemicals, food additives, vitamins, minerals, etc., etc. And yes, my fingers (had to use more than one to the length of testing) were a little sore from being pressed so often but they felt better within an hour of completion. Perhaps the people we have seen are modifying the technique vis a vis their prior training combined with that of Dr. Nambudripad (originator of the NAET system) as the NAET website (http://www.naet.com) does reflect this sort of limited approach, i.e., one item at a time - 25 hrs elimination - as noted in the Patient Support -> FAQ section. On the other hand, perhaps the examinations I and others have gone through are not NAET at all but some hybrid or different approach. I will certainly inquire the next time I see my physician, but that is several months hence. Now at one visit I did have an " analysis " by a physician's assistant trained in applied kinesiology. She introduced specific vitamin/mineral supplements and made comments as to which were beneficial and which were neutral and which were problematic. I found the experience... interesting ...but I couldn't get behind it. It was simply to dependent on the practioner and her personal interpretations for my taste - although the physician said that was exactly what he appreciated about it. He felt she was very good, at least on a par with the machine. To each their own. << Geoff, in regard to hair analysis, do you by chance mean Great Smokies lab rather than Smokey Mountain lab. Great Smokies is one of the most comprehensive labs that tests for a number of things that are rather " alternative " such as intestinal permeability, parasites. allergens, etc. >> Yes. Regards, Geoff Crenshaw, ACC ----------------------- Captain Cook's Cruise Center ** Usual Disclaimers ** ----------------------- Why do I have hope? Because I am under the blood of the Passover Lamb. EXO 12:7-3 / MAR 14:24 / REV 12:11 ICQ 60333388 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 25, 2000 Report Share Posted April 25, 2000 Hi ! Geoff Crenshaw here. You wrote: Message: 4 Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2000 11:26:08 -0500 From: <pinto@...> Subject: Re: NAET << This guy did the " meridian stress " test using a computer. He touched this pen-like device that was attached to his computer to different points on my hands and feet (supposed the energy channels (qi?) in Chinese medicine). Through this, he could supposedly determine what parts of me were in or out of balance. >> This is similar - though not the same - as what we experienced (a friend of my wife who had uncontrollable menstrual bleeding without any days off, then me through my bride's influence after hearing of her success, then my bride, then my mother, then our friends and their boys, etc.) BUT - the fellow who examined us used only the finger(s) unless or until the finger became sore... and nothing about discovering " out of balance " stuff -- just allergies... << results were that my joints were very out of balance, my liver was slightly out of balance and that I had allergies (this made my doctor put me on a regimen for fixing leaky gut). Interesting I guess except that this guy knew I had RA and the allergy thing was on my information sheet, so I am skeptical.And in my CBC my liver tests were all normal, so I don't know about the liver thing. >> Well, I thought mine was whacko too when he first did it -- but I think I would have truly put it under " Looney Tunes and Daffy Duck " if they'd given me the line yours gave you! << he had these little vials of supplements that he placed on a platform attached to the computer and then touched the relevant points on my hands and feet again, to determine if the supplement would " balance " it! So I bought some of these supplements and he said I should see results in 10 ... So you can see why I think this is all a bit of a scam. >> Yep, sounds pretty " scammy " here. On my end it worked like this: The fellow sat me down - asked me nothing - ws given no chart and no history. He hooked up his computer, put the stuff on the tray, and touched the end of my moistened (with water) finger with the stylus. He noted the results and at the end showed me what he found. He explained, 'You're allergic to this, this, and this, etc., these things are OK for you.' That was it. He had no connection whatsoever to any food supplements. He then prepared desensitization serums and did subcutaneous injections in the office and had me stay there under observation to ensure the mixtures were well tolerated and I didn't fall off into anaphylactic shock or something. When it was all good to go, he set me up with the serums, told me how to obtain the syringes I needed, and the doc kindly provided a Rx so at least I could save the cost of sales tax (syringes are available w/out prescription.) Regards, Geoff Crenshaw, ACC ----------------------- Captain Cook's Cruise Center ** Usual Disclaimers ** ----------------------- Why do I have hope? Because I am under the blood of the Passover Lamb. EXO 12:7-3 / MAR 14:24 / REV 12:11 ICQ 60333388 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 2, 2000 Report Share Posted May 2, 2000 Hello, Newton, a chiropractor and acupuncturist on this list, has stated his belief that NAET is a " useless placebo therapy " . I have a lot of respect for both chiropractic and acupuncture and those who practice these healing arts. I have found these practices to be helpful to me since I became ill with CFS 6+ years ago. However, I would like to offer my own viewpoint about the NAET. Where I live one person from our CFS support group was healed of CFS with NAET. She then became an NAET practitioner herself, and has also written a book about her battle with CFS, NAET, and healing in general. Since then, this NAET practitioner has healed our CFS support group leader of CFS as well. Our (now former) support group leader has returned to her field of practice (the law) and is now a full-time judge. Currently there are 6 of us from the CFS support group doing NAET as a group. After 8 months of this, all of us have shown gradual improvement in our health and all of us are still doing the NAET. I think that is remarkable. While I'm sure there are no medical tests that can prove the NAET can clear allergies, there are other ways to know that the NAET is working. One can see it in the loss of cravings (an allergy marker); in the ability to take supplements or eat foods that before caused adverse reactions; in the " healing crises " these clearings can generate; in the gradual increase in strength in endurance one can experience on this therapy; and in other ways, such as the relief of liver problems one might experience when the body is no longer dealing with so many allergens as toxins. To me, what works is what works, no matter how weird it may seem. And after 8 months with the NAET, I admit it still seems weird to me. I do believe that the NAET practitioner one has makes all the difference in the world. I know my NAET practioner has modified her NAET practice in ways that make a difference for people undergoing NAET who have CFS. (She also has modified her fee schedule for PWCs to such an extent that any PWC can join our NAET group and not be financially stressed). I belong to 2 other discussion lists for PWCs - an NAET discussion list, and a discussion list for healing by practices that don't include drugs. NAET is a practice I have heard about on those lists that consistently has helped people with CFS. As I stated recently, I am new to this list. Perhaps I should not have mentioned a practice like NAET in my comments about the ImmunoPro on this list. If this was improper, I apologize. I do share from my experiences here for whatever it may be worth to others. Bob Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 2, 2000 Report Share Posted May 2, 2000 could someone post where to purchase NAET? What is it? Is it an actual drug that requires a prescription? Thanks. Peggy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 2, 2000 Report Share Posted May 2, 2000 >Bob said: > > While I'm sure there are no medical tests that can prove the NAET can > clear allergies, there are other ways to know that the NAET is working. > ---------------------------------------------------------------- Sure there are tests, pre and post RAST and ELISA. Show me some pre and post results and I will be the next in line. ------------------------------------------------------------------- > To me, what works is what works, no matter how weird it may seem. > And after 8 months with the NAET, I admit it still seems weird to me. ---------------------------------------------------------------- I agree, if you feel better with it and it is not harmful, who cares. Like I said before, if a Shaman rattled bones over my head and I felt better, then sign me up. ------------------------------------------------------------ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 3, 2000 Report Share Posted May 3, 2000 NAET website: http://www.naet.com Please read the last 4-5 posts on NAET before you visit her web-site. ------------------------------------------------------------------ > could someone post where to purchase NAET? What is it? Is it an actual drug > that requires a prescription? Thanks. > > Peggy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 20, 2000 Report Share Posted August 20, 2000 In a message dated 08/20/2000 5:40:43 PM US Mountain Standard Time, egroups writes: << There's also a book, the name of which I naturally forget at the moment, that teaches you how to test yourself whether any substance is good or bad for you and how much >> Judith, I'd be very interested in the title of this book if you are able to remember it later. I am also extremely sensitive to supplements/drugs. Thanks! Laurel Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 18, 2000 Report Share Posted September 18, 2000 Has anyone out there tried NAET treatments for allergies? Today I just got the book which this doctor has written and it sounds pretty impressive. Also has some rave reviews from clinical ecologists and other doctors in the US who are positively raving about its success in eliminating allergies. Dan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 29, 2000 Report Share Posted October 29, 2000 , I only did it for awhile, practioner moved away. It helped allergies alot. . I have heard it is hard to " make it stick " - you may need to keep coming back. ? > HI, has anyone tried NAET therapy for CFS? There is a woman in my area with > CFS who is doing really well with it. Also, if anyone has studied up on it > or has opinions about it I'd love to hear. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 29, 2000 Report Share Posted October 29, 2000 , Could you please tell me what NAET? Jill Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 29, 2000 Report Share Posted October 29, 2000 2276@... wrote: > HI, has anyone tried NAET therapy for CFS? There is a woman in my > area with > CFS who is doing really well with it. Also, if anyone has studied up > on it > or has opinions about it I'd love to hear. > I went through a bunch of NAET therapy a couple years ago, and it helped tremendously. I was able to greatly decrease my migraine headaches, asthma, and allergy symptoms. In some cases, I was able to eliminate or cut back on prescription meds; in other cases, I needed to keep taking the meds but got more complete relief from them. NAET decreased my brainfog noticeably. I was also able to eliminate some 40 food allergies/sensitivities through NAET treatments. Now, the only foods that bother me are aspartame and some specific well-known migraine triggers (tyramines, mostly). But even there, an occasional NAET treatment for tyramines made me less reactive to those foods so that I could eat them occasionally. NAET is also the best and only thing I have found that decreases multiple chemical sensitivity. After years with CFIDS, it had got to the point where I would pass out if I tried walking down the laundry detergent aisle in the market. Now, I can handle it for brief exposures, without a mask. I still have problems with smoke when we have an inversion layer and people are burning leaves or using old, inefficient woodstoves; but occasional whiffs of smoke as I drive by no longer bother me like they did. On the down side, I am still disabled, I still have CFS/CFIDS/FM/MCS. But I can say that my symptoms are greatly diminished, and my quality of life improved, by using NAET. There are alot of PWCs who discuss their progress on the NAET mailing list. Send a message to LISTSERV@..., with " sub naet-l " in the body to join. -- el - andrea@... (IFF " FNORD " appears - remove it from my email address to reply) " ...wake now! Discover that you are the song that the morning brings... " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 29, 2000 Report Share Posted October 29, 2000 , Your functional glutathione levels will reach normal within 30 days at 4 packets/day. You may want to drop down to two packets a day after the 30 days or you are just wasting money. You will be able maintain your new higher glut. levels at 2 packets/day. Steve B. NAET > > > > > > HI, has anyone tried NAET therapy for CFS? There is a woman in > > my area with > > CFS who is doing really well with it. Also, if anyone has > > studied up on it > > or has opinions about it I'd love to hear. > > > > > > > This list is intended for patients to share personal experiences with each other, not to give medical advice. If you are interested in any treatment discussed here, please consult your doctor. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 29, 2000 Report Share Posted October 29, 2000 Hi , Pat Gurnick who runs the CEFCA group where you attended the meeting of Dr. Galpin, knows some CFS patients who were helped by NAET. Al NAET > HI, has anyone tried NAET therapy for CFS? There is a woman in my area with > CFS who is doing really well with it. Also, if anyone has studied up on it > or has opinions about it I'd love to hear. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 29, 2000 Report Share Posted October 29, 2000 NAET has helped me alot, but it hasn't been a cure. I particularly noticed a change after the B-vitamin treatment, and after the minerals treatment I was able to get my magnesium levels up to normal. Before then I was getting plenty of magnesium in a weekly Meyers cocktail IV, yet my mag. levels were always low. I began NAET because of a terrible allergy to milk protein which caused me to have hives after even a small amount of a milk product. This was making it impossible for me to take Imuplus. I now use 4 packets a day with some added yogurt and even some milk products on the side. No itching at all. For me, unbelievable!! I haven't had milk for 25 years. I've also gotten rid of my candida problem with NAET--no yeast at all visible on my microscope exam, and my sugar cravings have eased up. All of this while NOT on the yeast diet. I had several treatments for my own blood and for chlamydia p., with less apparent success, but perhaps it's strengthened my body in its fight against my infections. Hard to know. I also treated my dog at home for allergies to goldenrod, ragweed and her food, and healed big weeping sores the vet used to treat with prednisone. It also cured my son's lactose intolerance. It does take some time to see results with NAET, so only start if you have the time, patience and money to persist for at least the basic 10 treatments. You might not have any dramatic changes at that point, but you should have a sense of whether or not it's helping you. Every time I go in I laugh when I do the muscle testing, because it seems so preposterous. I was not a believer at first, but I have to admit it has definitely helped me. C. > NAET > > > HI, has anyone tried NAET therapy for CFS? There is a woman in > my area with > CFS who is doing really well with it. Also, if anyone has > studied up on it > or has opinions about it I'd love to hear. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 31, 2000 Report Share Posted October 31, 2000 Dear , I know a lady too, who claims to be doing well on the NAET. Perhpaps, it is the same lady? I've had 5 or 6 treatments myself, but I dropped out. It just plain seemed too stuid to me, and very much like a money pit/ time waster. Buy the book, and read about it first, then see what you think. Allergic to clouds...Phu-leeze ! Sorry, but I think NAET is BULL. Zippy > HI, has anyone tried NAET therapy for CFS? There is a woman in my area with > CFS who is doing really well with it. Also, if anyone has studied up on it > or has opinions about it I'd love to hear. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 31, 2000 Report Share Posted October 31, 2000 zippy890 wrote: > I know a lady too, who claims to be doing well on the NAET. > Perhpaps, it is the same lady? There's at least a dozen of us that I have encountered. > > I've had 5 or 6 treatments myself, but I dropped out. It just > plain seemed too stuid to me, and very much like a money pit/ time > waster. Buy the book, and read about it first, then see what you > think. Allergic to clouds...Phu-leeze ! > Sorry, but I think NAET is BULL. > I know what you mean. I tell my NAET practitioner to his face that it's " voodoo " , and he agrees with me ;@) But just because the explanation doesn't make any sense to my rational mind doesn't negate the fact that I (and others) are getting solid results. After all, heat transfer was and is a real and useful process, even when it was described in terms of the invisible substances " caloric " and " phlogiston " ! Rejecting the explanation does not make the phenomenon disappear. With this illness, we don't yet have a definitive explanation for the mechanism(s) involved in making us ill. So I'm inclined to be an empiricist - if it doesn't hurt to try it, I try it; if it works, I keep doing it ;@) -- el - andrea@... (IFF " FNORD " appears - remove it from my email address to reply) " ...wake now! Discover that you are the song that the morning brings... " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 26, 2000 Report Share Posted November 26, 2000 In a message dated 11/26/00 11:33:27 PM, jan@... wrote: <<NAET and BIOSET. It's awesome! My body is much stronger, my allergies and food sensitivities are GONE! Now I have to do my part and get rid of the yeast. Then I will be 100% back to normal, I'm sure ~ Ah yes, I did that, NAET that is, with very limited results unfortunately. I wish you the best with it!>> What are NAET and BIOSET? I am fairly well-informed about candida (at least I THOUGHT I was) but I am unfamiliar with these terms. Lynn Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 26, 2000 Report Share Posted November 26, 2000 What are NAET and BIOSET? I am fairly well-informed about candida (at least I THOUGHT I was) but I am unfamiliar with these terms. Lynn NAET is not directly related to Candida, it is an allergy treatment, using applied kinesiology (muscle testing). Here is a website about it: http://www.naet.com/ Jan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 3, 2000 Report Share Posted December 3, 2000 In a message dated 11/26/00 10:14:16 PM Central Standard Time, jan@... writes: << What are NAET and BIOSET? I am fairly well-informed about candida (at least I THOUGHT I was) but I am unfamiliar with these terms. Lynn NAET is not directly related to Candida, it is an allergy treatment, using applied kinesiology (muscle testing). Here is a website about it: http://www.naet.com/ Jan >> BIOSET is similar to NAET, except they treat DNA, organs, etc. (the things inside the body that may be working against us). ~ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.