Guest guest Posted January 30, 2012 Report Share Posted January 30, 2012 ALUMINIUM A neurotoxin that doesn't trouble man evidentally but almost certainly poses serious health problems for innocent children Background on aluminium Aluminium is EXTREMELY common and is a major element present in the earths crust and found in almost any soil sample. It can be assumed that over the millions of years animals have coped with KEEPING it out of our innards if you like and pass it efficiently through the normal body excretory systems. It is a known NEUROTOXIN and likely that in some isolated parts of the globe, circumstances by chance come together to provide a lunar landscape of no life and due to NEUROTOXIC aluminium. People living close to such areas may be expected to have higher levels of neurotoxic signs and possibly shortened lives. They may be expected to have lower skill levels and development delay. Silica for example might be expected to make the aluminium more safe. Conversely the presence of the fluoride moities might make the aluminium more dangerous. Either way the aluminium we meet normally has been locked up over and over again by nature until it is so harmless that no CHEMICAL means are known to unlock the metal element. Unfortunately in the past 200 years or possibly longer we have the capability to unlock the aluminium tied up to other elements and the result was so astounding that people first would swop solid gold for the same weight of aluminium. Again, unfortunately today, aluminium metal is somewhat common and decidely more economic to buy. It has been widely used by the public in general for 80 years and although its harm and neurotoxic harm has been long known its convenience, especially for cooking has led to its acceptance and widespread safe use. Are people aware they are playing with fire when they cook with aluminium? Watching ALUMINIUM notre poison quotidien reminds us strongly that heating acid foodstuffs in aluminium is not a good idea even if the aluminium pan afterwards is gleaming and like new. You are in effect TOXIFYING yourself but arguably all or nearly all is eliminated. Why take the chance today with many better alternatives? Putting these chemicals direct into your muscle circumvents the protective mechanism built up to resist an omnipresent threat to our health with predictable results. We have seen since 1993 the harm from aluminium in our muscle tissue even though at the time the harm was seen the cause escaped us. While the malady of Pinks and Minamata from mercury came as a surprise to scientists who battled for decades to find the cause when the evidence before them was ignored: Today with few known major neurological harm incidents from aluminium we ignore at our peril the obvious hike in aluminium in muscle received over the past 20 years when injecting aluminium into muscle became compulsory because of the harm the same injections did to our skin when injected to a lesser degree in our bodies. So because it harmed us by producing skin effects we now let it produce muscle harm and by logic brain harm. This is OK to 2012 WHO, CDC and FDA standard as expected. But not acceptable to anyone who takes seriously repeated observation in thousands of humans and the precautionary principle that breast cancer to half the female poulation and brain disease for tens of thousands should be prevented. We know aluminium not locked up in muscles but migrates not through excretory channels but to the brain. Again repeated science this time in animals and by inference from brain autopsy of humans. Of course there may be those that believe still in spontaneous generation of aluminium from astrocytes amongst the regulators. We look for causes for Alzheimers Disease, autism et al and we have a virgin neurotoxin with no illness to pin on to it. How about trying what we we know and then proving hundreds of scientists all plagiarising each other and finding the neurotoxic harm of aluminium known for hundreds of years was faulty, bad or junk science. OR: Fast forward with Alzheimers and Autism. It's your call CDC, FDA and WHO. Amazing that for 20 years as we increase this aluminium exposure and witness rising autism et al that we fail to see CONNECTIONS. We can if we are lucky only see COINCIDENCE. Some don't yet see even this. We do not apply the precautionary principle so much as the DAMN IT principle. Don't DAMN me; DAMN the « Pauvre Clochards ». But who are « Pauvre Clochards ». Babies? Dead people: SIDS? Children with autism? Exactly who does the French minister think is a « Pauvre Clochard »? Certainly not him! We can identify the usage of aluminium from natural aluminium compounds of the 1926 era injected close to the skin, through to todays man made aluminium hydroxide moities now injected deep into our bodies. A prime example of backward technology going from safe vaccines to dangerous ones. A change, as said, which mirrors exactly the huge rise in autism that has so far escaped our gaze as to sensible options for causation and often even to those who dont see a rise even. MARVELLOUS! The attitude of pro-vaccine to vaccinate ever more at any cost is enough to bring the shivers down any good chemists back. We can't take the aluminium from 3 vaccines as young adults so 30 such for children is MADNESS. No ALUMINIUM in my muscle thanks. I get my protection from the MAFIA by the way. You hit me and I'll want to see you hit too. The Franch health minister did get her shot publically 3 years ago and with 4 years to harm she is still an experimental receiver of the 2009 H1N1 vaccine as of 2012 January. Evidentally long term safety checks for vaccines are not done in todays « Brave World » of vaccinide practice. In this strange world, where babies get 30 or more vaccines at a very early age; these bold injectors REFUSE one measly: NEUROTOXIC mercury, NEUROTOXIC aluminium, or Squalene based shot for themselves; when in rude, peak, unshakeable health and good weight and as everyone knows: One shot and here I am still breathing. What's the PROBLEM? Pity we can't say the same for Harry; shot at and dead in 6 hours after his long life of 8 weeks of perfectly good normal health until his mum got his TOXIC vaccine and along with a million others babies now dead from that inexplicable condition of perfect health to virus and bacteria free death IMMEDIATELY following vaccines. How can a baby die after receiving neurotoxic aluminium and neurotoxic mercury at sublethal levels and be free of clinical illness? Are they dying of mass hysteria like those New York girls who while not dying are so much bigger to resist neurotoxic aluminium vaccines given once only each month for three times. And again in the secretive world of vaccines we cannot be sure they ever received ANY neurotoxic aluminium vaccines. Harry didn't even UP the SIDS numbers one iota as his mum was clearly, evidently and easily provably GUILTY of murdering him by the same safe science that delivers 2012 safe vaccines. Why aren't the same rigourous legal conditions needed for the millions of vaccine harmed folk? For the simple reason the vaccine industry would be BANKRUPT straight away and we know we need a vaccine industry to manufacture deadly bugs to kill our worldly enemies and provide safe vaccines for those who are FRIENDS. Personally I have signed a deal with Doctor Faust not any of these Doctors of Vaccinide. Sally got lynched five times quicker than your average person before he finds his vaccine case taken off the staute for Abuse of the Law. One day we may remove: NEUROTOXIC mercury, NEUROTOXIC aluminium, And Squalene based vaccines. As at present they are: Only for babies. Not suitable for medical practising adults. Your NEUROTOXIN loaded vaccines are ready for 2012. Roll up, roll up, roll up your sleeves. Come and get it: NEUROTOXIC vaccines: FREE for the OLDIES. FREE for the POOR. Free for the THIRD WORLD. OUT of STOCK for the RICH. Out of stock for MEDICS. Out of stock for GOVERNORS. Is this 21st Century EUGENICS? ALUMINIUM: A neurotoxin that doesn't trouble man evidentally but almost certainly poses serious health problems for innocent children ALUMINIUM TIMELINE for approx 13 - 19 years ago: http://aluminiumetvaccins.e-monsite.com/pages/ma-synthese-i/fibromyalgie-syndrome-de-fatigue-chronique-et-myofasciite-a-macrophages.html Historique de la Myofasciite à Macrophages Mai 1993 : Docteur COQUET Neuropathologiste observe le premier cas Français. Une biopsie musculaire pratiquée chez une femme suspectée de polymyosite montre des lésions jamais publiées en pathologie musculaire. Une première publication américaine antérieure avait déjà observé cet aspect histologique particulier (1982. MRACK). Décembre 93 : Ce cas est présenté à la Société scientifique Française de Neuropathologie à Paris. Personne n’avait vu de telles lésions. 1994 : Professeur Romain GHERARDI, chef du service d'histologie de l'hôpital Henri-Mondor, à Créteil (Val-de-Marne). Groupe d'Etude et de Recherche sur le Muscle et le Nerf (GERMEN) observe un deuxième cas. 1995 : 2 nouveaux cas (Bordeaux et Créteil). 1996 : Réunion sous l’égide de l’Association Française des Myopathies des médecins ayant observés des cas identiques : Fardeau (Institut de Myologie), Coquet (CHU Bordeaux) Ghérardi (CHU Créteil), Pellissier (CHU Marseille), Mussini (CHU Nantes) : tous les cas montrent les mêmes lésions histologiques (amas de macrophages dans fascia et muscle contigu) et ultrastructurales (inclusions en aiguilles dans les macrophages). Un tableau clinique commun se dégage des observations : douleurs musculaires et articulaires, fatigue intense. On ne connaît pas la nature des inclusions observées en microscopie électronique. A la demande de l’Association Française des Myopathies, un groupe de travail est créé par le Pr Chérin, clinicien en médecine interne à la Pitié-Salpétrière, dénommé GERMMAD (Groupe de Recherche sur les Maladies Musculaires Acquises et Dysimmunitaires), qui en assure la présidence. Ce groupe de recherche associe des cliniciens, des histologistes et des immunologistes. Compte tenu de l’apparition de nouveaux cas, une réunion du GERMMAD se tient à Paris, spécifiquement dédiée à cette nouvelle myopathie. Le nom descriptif de 'myofasciite à macrophages' est proposé et accepté par le groupe. 1998 : Parution de l’article du ' Lancet '. A l’époque on ne connaissait toujours pas la nature des inclusions, on pensait qu’il pouvait s’agir d’une nouvelle maladie d’origine virale, bactérienne ou toxique. Everybody VERY happy to find these lesions, VERY happy to identify it as causing HARM. Until after 1998 it wasn't a virus. It wasn't bacteria. It was VACCINE ALUMINIUM harm. Immediately the WHO, the vaccinide scientists immediately knew: This finding shows ABSOLUTELY no HARM. It indicates the presence of vaccines WORKING. It is just a COINCIDENCE that these people are very ill. DO NOTHING No: that's too sever. ADD MORE ALUMINIUM. And watch the autism go down. Five years of breath taking scientific DISCOVERY. Followed by now nearly 15 years of explaining away INCREASED disease from NEUROTOXIC vaccines by some process akin to VOO(CIN)DOO called VACCINIDE. NOTE: 1998 was not a good year for the LANCET. Ask any well known VACCINIDE advocate. But one day 1998 WILL go down as the beginning of the end for VACCINIDE policies. ALUMINIUM Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.