Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

ADJUVANTS really do WORK

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

ADJUVANTS really do WORKHow many people know exactly HOW WELL (or BADLY) they work?READ ONALL for an 8 per cent FINANCIAL saving:

BIG HARMA needs this EXTRA money:

SO:

« PAUVRE CLOCHARDS » must

take the NEURO TOXIC option.

http://pubget.com/paper/15308373

Experimental

squalene adjuvant. I. Preparation and testing of its effectiveness.

Judit

Süli, Zdenek

Benísek,

Eliás, Stefan

Svrcek,

Ondrejková, Róbert

Ondrejkaand Viera

Bajová Vaccine 22(25-26):3464-9 (2004)

PMID 15308373

The

authors prepared experimental lipoid adjuvant of the oil-in-water

(O/W) type, based on squalene (ESA: experimental squalene adjuvant),

intended for liquid inactivated veterinary vaccines.

The

final concentration of squalene in the vaccine was 5% (w/v).

Detergents

Poloxamer 105 in the concentration of 4% (w/v) and Abil-Care in the

concentration of 2% were used as emulsifiers.

The

water component was inactivated virus suspension. Emulsification at

decreased temperatures (up to 37 degrees C) fails to denaturate the

immunization antigen.

The

effectiveness of experimental squalene adjuvant was tested using a

liquid inactivated adjuvant rabies vaccine and a liquid porcine

parvovirus vaccine in comparison with adjuvant-free vaccines or

vaccines potentiated with aluminium hydroxide.

The

squalene adjuvant increased the immunogenic activity of

non-potentiated rabies vaccine approximately 1.8-fold, while

aluminium hydroxide increased the effectiveness of rabies vaccine

only 1.08-fold.

The

antigenic activity, i.e. the level of specific antibodies after

vaccination was significantly increased by using both adjuvants; ESA

was more efficient than aluminium hydroxide.

RISK and BENEFIT at work by your

FIENDLY BIG HARMA company:

You take the risk. DIABETES, AUTISM,

SIDS et al

They get an 8 per cent benefit from aluminium neurotoxin or an 80 per cent hike in profit from possible GWS inducing squalene. There is nothing they will not do for their good health and welfare.And for your good health it is GWS or neurological illness but you do have the chance of not getting a vaccine preventable illness.Is using a NEUROTOXIN in large amounts sensible for babies or any person for so little gain.RISK vs BENEFITWho takes the RISKS?WHO gets the BENEFITS?VACINEES are really just "PAUVRE CLOCHARDS"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...