Guest guest Posted January 31, 2012 Report Share Posted January 31, 2012 ADJUVANTS really do WORKHow many people know exactly HOW WELL (or BADLY) they work?READ ONALL for an 8 per cent FINANCIAL saving: BIG HARMA needs this EXTRA money: SO: « PAUVRE CLOCHARDS » must take the NEURO TOXIC option. http://pubget.com/paper/15308373 Experimental squalene adjuvant. I. Preparation and testing of its effectiveness. Judit Süli, Zdenek BenÃsek, Eliás, Stefan Svrcek, Ondrejková, Róbert Ondrejkaand Viera Bajová Vaccine 22(25-26):3464-9 (2004) PMID 15308373 The authors prepared experimental lipoid adjuvant of the oil-in-water (O/W) type, based on squalene (ESA: experimental squalene adjuvant), intended for liquid inactivated veterinary vaccines. The final concentration of squalene in the vaccine was 5% (w/v). Detergents Poloxamer 105 in the concentration of 4% (w/v) and Abil-Care in the concentration of 2% were used as emulsifiers. The water component was inactivated virus suspension. Emulsification at decreased temperatures (up to 37 degrees C) fails to denaturate the immunization antigen. The effectiveness of experimental squalene adjuvant was tested using a liquid inactivated adjuvant rabies vaccine and a liquid porcine parvovirus vaccine in comparison with adjuvant-free vaccines or vaccines potentiated with aluminium hydroxide. The squalene adjuvant increased the immunogenic activity of non-potentiated rabies vaccine approximately 1.8-fold, while aluminium hydroxide increased the effectiveness of rabies vaccine only 1.08-fold. The antigenic activity, i.e. the level of specific antibodies after vaccination was significantly increased by using both adjuvants; ESA was more efficient than aluminium hydroxide. RISK and BENEFIT at work by your FIENDLY BIG HARMA company: You take the risk. DIABETES, AUTISM, SIDS et al They get an 8 per cent benefit from aluminium neurotoxin or an 80 per cent hike in profit from possible GWS inducing squalene. There is nothing they will not do for their good health and welfare.And for your good health it is GWS or neurological illness but you do have the chance of not getting a vaccine preventable illness.Is using a NEUROTOXIN in large amounts sensible for babies or any person for so little gain.RISK vs BENEFITWho takes the RISKS?WHO gets the BENEFITS?VACINEES are really just "PAUVRE CLOCHARDS" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.