Re: Re: Research Shows Illness Is Real & Treatable ~ Chronic ...

[Guest guest]

Jeanine,

Not sure what you mean by " went back " . Lots of litigation is based on

insurance bad faith for denial of coverage. Lots of litigation is based on

knocking the defense BS of " not plausible " out of the case.

As far as the systemic fraud of the US Chamber's environmental science

being mass marketed to the courts and health policy, as far as I know, there

is only ONE case specifically centered on this........so far.

In a message dated 8/1/2010 12:45:10 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,

jeaninem660@... writes:

has anyone went back and sued their insurance co. on the bases a

fraud,because they were denied coverage on damages do to WDB exposure?

>

> You are welcome, Dr. Thrasher. The CIRS-WDB paper is great for showing

what

> IS science, and while it accurately goes into the agnotology instilled in

> the psyche of physicians and other decision makers by proponents of

> industry, now it is time for the practical application of this

information.

>

[Guest guest]

Yes. Entities don't get sued for mold. They get sued for bad faith, or

failure to disclose, or construction defect or etc. In other words, they

get sued for their actions or lack of actions that caused the mold or caused

the continued growth of mold, or caused people to stay in the mold, etc.

In a message dated 8/1/2010 5:19:01 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,

kmtown2003@... writes:

OK so has anyone won or settled even when there is a mold clause???

[Guest guest]

OK so has anyone won or settled even when there is a mold clause???   Or is

the argument that its not mold but mycotoxins exposure?

From: snk1955@... <snk1955@...>

Subject: Re: [] Re: Research Shows Illness Is Real & Treatable ~

Chronic ...

Date: Sunday, August 1, 2010, 11:53 AM

Jeanine,

Not sure what you mean by " went back " . Lots of litigation is based on

insurance bad faith for denial of coverage. Lots of litigation is based on

knocking the defense BS of " not plausible " out of the case.

As far as the systemic fraud of the US Chamber's environmental science

being mass marketed to the courts and health policy, as far as I know, there

is only ONE case specifically centered on this........so far.

In a message dated 8/1/2010 12:45:10 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,

jeaninem660@... writes:

has anyone went back and sued their insurance co. on the bases a

fraud,because they were denied coverage on damages do to WDB exposure?