Guest guest Posted March 14, 2012 Report Share Posted March 14, 2012 DUTY The duty of the HIGH COURT judge was clear. - is a good and efficient medical researcher. Wakefield and the Royal Free Hospital team in 1998 were among the first groups to realise the link of autism to other pathologies. Namely that of gut illness. They even gave a name to the peculiar gut illness they found. - with 40 years experience had never seen the same type of condition before. Other people clearly saw their DUTY too. The paper was much attacked by a journalist and world expert surely on gut problems and he has triumphed in a battle to get this illness demoted to being no illness in 90 per cent of those suffering in the home situation from diarrhoea and constipation. Further he has temporarily managed to get these self styled career doctors slung out of their profession. The High Court has however seen through the non existent expertise of Mr Deer and proclaimed FOUL himself for the throwing out of the profession of a person who is in fact a serious and professional person. - should NEVER have been expelled from his profession. The GMC was in ERROR. The dozen children may well have been exposed to vaccines no longer used in England and the link of autism and gut issues after vaccines is an issue that must be openly discussed even in research papers. The long and continued attack has its basis solely in the link to vaccines. A link which is ALWAYS condemned to the point of research money drying up, demotion and in this case removal from a lifetime of work. People who secretly have meetings talking of vaccine deaths and vaccine injuries and the public knowledge years later implies that much known harm probably never gets to the light of common knowledge. One person both sitting in on private meetings on vaccine deaths and then going to court on oath denying vaccines caused anything other than prolonging life. The risk benefit equation being calculated in private. In public the adverse events are ZERO. Disputed even by mnaufacturers who claim one death per thousand is the NORM. But in line with no knowledge over many causes and many increases in illness and death how accurate are these risk-benefit calculations. Not in agreement among the players involved it seems. Small print talking of all kinds of illness while in courts 99.9 per cent of cases are thrown out or dont get to court. Nuclear power so safe that no serious accident is possible. Not born out by experience. Vaccine safety is schizophrenic at best with as we see different parties with different stories. One million SIDS with absolutely no explanation. Vaccine cause in the form of a powerful neurotoxin at 200 fold times that of safety is evidently outside the scope of the risk – benefit calculation. Until a chemistry professor innocently asked why we put mercury in vaccines. Safety tests done on fit and healthy adults for a short period and one vaccine only. Then in use given to babies clearly not in perfect health, often several at a time and of course by persons not always on top of their jobs. Conditions of storage and use often blatantly not followed. But with the Deer exposee that autism sufferers do not have gut issues and supported by eminent researchers such as Dr Hyman we seem that here the lifelong expertise of - is wrong. Demotion from his profession at a kangaroo court. Only righted on appeal to a court of JUSTICE. But trickling in are various researchers who approach this problem in a less contentious way. http://mbio.asm.org/content/3/1/e00019-12.abstract Last month a team from a New York University broached the forbidden issue of silence and denial of links with autism and gut issues. Gastrointestinal pathology is a common feature of autism. So the research paper starts. Despite all the denials by Deer, the BMJ, and its sponsor the vaccine makers Merck it does seem as if gut issues are common in autism. How can we do the best for these children by arguing over and denying FACT? Not so long ago autism was an illness with no recovery. Today 10 to 20 per cent move back to HEALTH. But we have moved a long way from generations ago that looked at nutrition and safe water for avoiding illness. Today its mercury vaccines, drugs to control everything that might befall a little baby and nutrition. That is a thing of the past. If todays child cannot survive on Cows Milk in place of Human Milk or if todays child cannot survive on oodles of tylenol tablets (watch out for the cyanide in the faulty production) instead of old fashioned vitamin C and cod liver oil, then the gut issue is, that there will be gut issues and does this mean damage to the brain as well? Retracted the paper is but other research is coming forward in a tsunami impossible to stop if the retraction rate of twelve years investigation is necessary to find enough holes to get the work withdrawn. Vaccine issues are minute but for a totally healthy child; is sudden unexpected death or one per cent with life time health issues the price we are prepared to pay for everyone else to be HEALTHY. Tonights documentary in France describes the DUTY of every good French person in the war to DENOUNCE those who are not of pure blood. Today we see one million SIDS and ten million autism children likewise DENOUNCED for not being FIT, HEALTHY or SUFFICIENT citizens to withstand their life saving vaccines. It looks as if while one wrong has been righted, other wrongs are just continuing as everyone does their DUTY. DUTY Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.