clomiphene

[Guest guest]

CLOMIPHENE

Autism Causation

Can a rogue chemical cause AUTISM?

Reviewing modern changes in health care

for infants, immediately throws up vaccines and injectables with

mercury as a PRIME SUSPECT, especially when they were first mooted as

being bad for the baby by the public. The vaccine industry and all

involved with it denied at first that they would expose infants to

mercury. What an admission of DON'T KNOW, DON'T CARE, DON'T ROCK OUR

MONEY BOAT.

In fact you don't need to be a rocket

scientist to see conditions bad for the normal child at nearly every

turn in modern science. Where did all that SUNSHINE, ORANGE JUICE and

COD LIVER OIL go to?

It would be fair to say that scientists

see absolutely no danger in feeding NOVEL chemicals to babies but are

so, so, so quick to see money from chemicals, treatments et al.

Harm? What harm? If there is harm it is

for regulators and government to sort out. For us its: BarrOw LOads

of CaSh to the bank and anyone who gets in our way will get the

« Wakefield » treatment.

You will wake up and find your home is

some damp, cold, field. DO KNOW (chemicals harm babies) , DO CARE

(about making barrow loads of money) and WILL use ROCKS to BREAK YOU.

Yesterday it was the Wakefield treatment. Today its the GEIER

treatment also. But in season all the time: Record breaking ADVERSE

health effects for BABY.

Lead has been linked to IQ and

development pretty convincingly but only after 50 or more years of

struggle for reason and APPLIANCE OF SCIENCE. ce denied the harm

of lead at every turn until someone came up with lead free petrol.

After that it was not a problem to the Big earners. The improvement

in IQ after reduction in lead is now accepted by all. They even claim

the credit for taking the LEAD in all this.

The same acceptance for thalidomide. It

is an AUTISM inducing chemical.

The same acceptance for live rubella

EXCEPT if its live and in baby vaccines around every child bearing

mum in the world. Then it plays no part in autism WHATSOVER. That's

21st century seance.

Mercury is like lead but more so but as

it is still in vaccines it has no part to play in causing neuroloical

harm to an infant even when present at levels making the vaccines

toxic when diluted a hundred fold. 21st centruy seance AT

WORK.

So harm is a function of the

neurotoxicity of the substance tempered by the risk-benefit

calculation. When lead petrol was needed, the lead was non-toxic.

When lead was a poisoner of cars as well as babies it suddenly had a

MEGA change in the risk-benefit calculation that caused its use to

cease and desist immediately.

Mercury is not at this critical level

yet except that it has been removed (well thats want seantists tell

us) from all vaccines in 2000 and is a theoretical neurotoxin but not

an actual neurotoxin (21st century seance) and all that

increased mercury being used for vaccines ( not a real, real

increase)? Well that's all part of 21st century seance.

Rhesus incompatibility used to cause a

massive excess of neuro-damged infants until a court case needed 21st

seance to find that this was all humbug. Just add a toxic dose of

mercury, inject it several times into pregnant rhesus incompatible

mums and all that excess of neuro-damage disappears back to ZERO.

2007 seance in action again.

Amazing all this seance!

One that just got my interest is a

neurotoxic chemical given to pregnant mothers to be.

Great that!

First they came up with the idea of

injecting mercury into the one day infant in 1991.

When that bluff was called they came up

with the seance of injecting pregant mums with mercury in 2009. Got

to protect baby to be and what better than 200 fold neurotoxic

mercury. The result of complaints of abortions rising in one year

from one per year to one hundred and seventy nine a year is

breathtaking seance as common sense tells us of many thousands of

abortions after vaccines not getting recorded properly (good seance

at work here?).

But all the while, they were quietly

giving mothers, not pregnant, that lovely neurotoxic chemical

CLOMIPHENE. Take one look at that nitrogen surrounded by alkyl groups

in its chemical STRUCTURE and it makes you drool over a possible

unexploited chemical warfare agent. How lovely to be able to use such

a product on women and women who desperately want to become pregnant.

Just think of the children they will have if they survive! tists

of the future?

Not having that odd ten million dollars

for research I just thought that this might do for a first appraisal

of this lovely STUFF:

http://humrep.oxfordjournals.org/content/12/4/706.long

A nice young victim, I mean pregnant

mum to be. Three days into the chemical warfare agent, or baby

developer and mum becomes a NEW WOMAN.

Read on yourself, I don't want you to

take my word for it that this stuff would make a chemical warfare

expert drool. Look for yourself.

But does it cause the infant to be

neurologically challenged or will he or she be the next Einstein?

Its a close call but to date a huge

number of women are taking this stuff.

So someone has made the decison. Let's

get that Barrel flow ROLLING!

So perhaps my chemical instructors in

the 1960's were old fashioned?

I mean today its 21st

century SEANCE all the way to the bank for these new age medical

experts.

Autism Causation

CLOMIPHENE

I really liked the bit about:

With neuroleptic medication (more

barrels rolling to the banks), the patient became AWARE!

She was aware she was ILL!

And the clincher: Blame it on the

patient. She was ODD before.

The clomiphene is JUST FINE.

No need to stop those barrels rolling

to the bank.

Autism Causation

Its not

CLOMIPHENE

Its not mercury

It must be we never noticed before!