[FAME Systems] Review of Lyons' Vaccines are effective, save many lives'

[Guest guest]

Dear Lyons and the Letter Reader at

MTExpress.com,

   On 'balance',

Lyons' 5 February 2012 piece on the MTExpress.com website

titled, "Vaccines are effective, save many lives", appears to be

an example of unsubstantiated and unsubstantiable pro-vaccine

propaganda typical of the average media vaccine acolyte.

   As such, this article did not meet this reviewer's

expectations for a medical doctor who is board-certified in

family practice and claims to use a scientific approach to the

issues that she discusses.

   Moreover, the statements made in this article diverge from

the facts as this researcher, who has spent more than a decade

in studying the science as well as working with others to

publish peer-reviewed articles addressing key

vaccine/vaccination issues, understands them.

   An in-depth, passage by passage, review that provides the

evidence that supports the preceding assertions can be found at

   http://dr-king.com/docs/120214_DrftRevu_VaccinesAreEffective_SaveManyLives_b.pdf.

  

As with all of my in-depth reviews, the "Introductory Remarks"

include the following passage,

     "Finally,

should anyone find any significant factual error in this

review for which they have

     independent [a], scientifically sound,

peer-reviewed published substantiating documents,

     please   submit that information to this reviewer so that

he can improve his understanding

     of factual reality and, where appropriate, revise his

views and this review.

        [a]  To qualify, the study should be published by

researchers who have no conflicts of interest from

              their ties to either those commercial entities who

profit from the sale of vaccines or those entities,

              academic, commercial or governmental, who actively

promote inoculation programs using

              vaccines."

   Hopefully, you will provide an in-depth fact- and

science- based rebuttal to those statements for which you or

your colleagues and supporters have and can provide qualified 

documents (see footnote "[a]"),

which support the assertions in your cited article and/or

correct any significant factual error in my review so that you

may improve my understanding of factual reality and help me to

revise my views and my review of your article as published on

MTExpress.com

  

Respectfully,

G. King, PhD

http://www.dr-king.com

The Reviewer and Founder, FAME Systems

PS: If you want a ".doc" copy to more easily copy out elements

in a manner that preserves their fidelity,

       then you need only send an e-mail with:

"REVULyons_PGK" in the subject line.