GENERAL ADJUVANT

[Guest guest]

NOBEL PRIZE WINNER PROFESSOR RICHET

Richet and ANAPHYLAXIS

The work of Professor Richet on

vaccines was good enough to deserve a well merited Nobel Prize.

His work on ANAPHYLAXIS holds good

today.

Pity no one much in the vaccine

industry uses his knowledge; must be down to extra profit and extra

deaths and injuries as side effects which are of little consequence

to a government protected industry.

VERY BAD NEWS for many people

repeatedly vaccinated with the same antigens.

These antigens need not be living

organisms but can be simple molecules. Hence EVERY adjuvant elicits

UNWANTED responses. Do we really need to react violently to normal

foods when used as adjuvants.

In the face of this Nobel Prize work on

vaccines Dr Ramon shortly after found that adding aluminium compounds

to the vaccine mix enabled a better reaction for less money. The

abscesses, swellings, edema et al were so much better or the savings

in antigen manufacture compared to dirt; cheap DIRT.

A decade later it was found that mixing

in a bit of NEUROTOXIC mercury (not dirt cheap but powerful in low

amounts) worked wonders on the vaccine response and cutting along

story short and a few million dead vaccinated children or tens of

millions of infants not quite dead from a range of muscular, nervous

and diabetic ills; we arrived in 1997 when people could not BELIEVE

that any SANE human would add MERCURY let alone an extremely

NEUROTOXIC form of mercury needlessly to a vaccine for the one day

old infant. Go back to your CHEMIST expert (Boyd Haley) and tell him

we would NEVER put mercury in any babies vaccine.

In the race to avoid payouts to the

whole world for the fact that mercury was ACTUALLY in babies vaccines

given at ONE DAY of age for the past ten years nearly, the first

PROPAGANDA exercise was to tell the world that MERCURY would be out

as soon as possible and certainly within a five year frame of time.

And it is NOT now given to the one day infant as of IMMEDIATE effect.

No admissions on peanut oil in vaccines and fatal allergies etc etc

though.

Many people in the vaccine, regulatory

and political arena actually accepted these lies (the mercury has

gone) as TRUTH by 2004. For today in 2012 the unborn child qualifies

for the top dose of this NEUROTOXIN, alongside any out of work or

past the age of work person too.

But while they (regulators, industry,

governments) LIED, they also in a reactive moment decided to UP the

amounts of aluminium in many vaccines. Never keep the same mix for a

killer medicament for more than 5 years. Stops a lot of inconvenient

ills becoming OBVIOUS. More Motor Neuron Disease. More ALS. More

AUTISM. But HEY you can't win every deadly shot you try.

To date no one has found ANY safe

adjuvant, but there are dangerous ones and lethal ones. Was this an

exercise in turning dangerous adjuvants into lethal adjuvants?

Certainly saves on the brewing mixes though. The CDC put it NICELY

though We have used ADJUVANTS safely for DECADES. True when you

control who can put in a vaccine claim and control the judiciary to a

large extent. Firstly anyone who DARED claim adjuvant harm would not

get the complaint past the first lowly officials.

The changes to vaccines and their

ingredients is a closely guarded secret over the past 90 years but

the history of modern illnesses that have come and gone or come and

developed into EPIDEMICS show a good correlation with these secretive

actions and WARRANT further research. But there is little money and

interest in proving how stupid clever and powerful people can be.

Taking one as an example to add to the

THIMEROSAL and many kinds of ALUMINIUM compounds (sulphates,

phosphates, oxides et al) and of course in various mixes and varying

amounts is one of particular interest.

ADJUVANT 65

A bit of handiwork from MERCK and no

doubt that EXPERT Maurice Hilleman who claimed also to be behind the

introduction of AIDS and other ills to the modern world.

Whether this is true or not is

uncertain. We cannot be sure whether his claims of infecting the

world is true or just another joke to him.

However ADJUVANT 65 is the work of

MERCK and Maurice Hilleman the EXPERT vaccinologist.

Introduced around 1964 or so. And ten

years later it was being evaluated for its SAFETY.

Today we can be clear on ADJUVANT 65.

It is SAFE when injected into

TERMINALLY ILL patients.

But highly UNLIKELY to be in any human

vaccines today. I hope.

Anyone else who had it may have found

it produced terminally ill patients or worse made your life dependent

on NOT eating PEANUTS ever again.

According to modern experts on vaccines

they have this to say about injecting PEANUT OIL into little infants:

In general PEANUT OIL is too toxic

for routine prophylactic vaccine use.

So is it still used in vaccines in

2012?

If not when was it finally abandoned?

We can be sure it was in some flu vaccines. Today the USA flu

vaccines tend not to have any ADJUVANTS. This would lead to more

complaints than come back anyway to vaccine companies. In Europe we

are not so lucky. Why the two tier system?

To understand the harm of ADJUVANTS you

need do no more than UNDERSTAND the research of Professor Richet but

in addition how can you ETHICALLY test ADJUVANTS? They do of course

by some slight of logic and today as noted the addition of peanut oil

was just one of many gaffs in the race to medicate the HEALTHY IMMUNE

infant.

So why don't vaccine experts take note

of the work on ANAPHYLAXIS of

NOBEL PRIZE WINNER PROFESSOR RICHET

http://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/concerns/adjuvants.html

CDC claim they have been used safely

for decades. Rather denying simple TRUTH a little. They also forget

the first years of their use and developmetn before the 1930's.

http://www.invivogen.com/review-vaccine-adjuvants

Nice multicoloured diagrams but is it

as simple as this.

http://www.invivogen.com/vaccine-adjuvants?gclid=CKaMkv_Yyq0CFQUOfAodYjFlgg

Vaccine. 2007

May 10;25(19):3752-62. Epub 2007 Feb 16.

Nice

to think that after nearly 100 years we are beginning to find we know

NOTHING about adjuvants.

Circa

2007.

Vaccine

adjuvants revisited.

Aguilar

JC, Rodríguez

EG.

Source

Division

of Vaccines, Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, P.O.

Box 6162, La Habana 10600, Cuba. julio.aguilar@...

The

development of new adjuvants for human vaccines has become an

expanding field of research in the last thirty years, for generating

stronger vaccines capable of inducing protective and long-lasting

immunity in humans. Instead of such efforts, with several adjuvant

strategies approaching to requirements for their clinical

application, limitations like adjuvant

toxicity remain to be fully surpassed. Here we summarize the

current status of adjuvant development, including regulatory

recommendations, adjuvant requirements, and adjuvant categories like

mineral salts, tensoactive compounds, microorganism-derived

adjuvants, emulsions, cytokines, polysaccharides, nucleic acid-based

adjuvants, and a section dedicated to particulate antigen delivery

systems. The mechanisms of adjuvanticity are also discussed in the

light of recent findings on Toll-like receptors' biology and their

involvement on immune activation.

By

Circa 2009, one adjuvant sometimes used causes Breast Cancer. Now is

this comforting or not?

Freund's

vaccine adjuvant promotes Her2/Neu breast cancer

S Cotroneo, Jill

D Haag,

R Stapel, Jordy

L Waller, Stephan

Woditschka and

N Gould*

But

one sure thing:

We

need to find an ADJUVANT to overcome deficiencies of the original and

practically only adjuvant SAFELY? used today, the ALUMINIUM ones.

Are

Motor Neuron Disease, Multiple Sclerosis and Alzheimer Disease

DEFICIENCY DISEASES?