Guest guest Posted February 15, 2012 Report Share Posted February 15, 2012 What does CAPLAN stand for? HONESTY? ETHICS? SAFETY? Caplan says NOONE has ever had a bad reaction to GARDASIL! So I thought I had better check my 3 500 plus booklet on GARDASIL HARM Page 2 says: Confusion, Manic, Unable to recognise her own parents, Confusional state, PERMANENT DISABILITY, SERIOUS. Very close to his specific challenge that amongst the no bad reactiopns there isn't one that takes your mind away. And only 99.99 per cent of the booklet still to plough through! Of course all these thousands of BAD REACTIONS to GARDASIL could be LIES. But then so could CAPLAN with his idea that gardasil is the FIRST vaccine that doesn't elicit ONE SINGLE adverse reaction. Pretty clever with NEUROTOXIC aluminium in gardasil that we know takes probably at least four years before any harm kicks in from it's KNOWN danger. And gardasil is just around 5 to 6 years into use and has already been reformulated several times. Why reformulate vaccines that don't cause bad reactions and that prevent cancer? Are the later versions less safe, more safe or IDENTICAL to the first versions? I am confused not by a bad adverse VACCINE reaction but by statements from Caplan that don't match REALITY. NO BAD REACTIONS to this vaccine. That's CAPLANS boast. And he is a HIGHLY ETHICAL man. BIO ethical in fact. Does that mean he is GMO'd like the GARDASIL vaccine? The man made bits of DNA can't be harmful as they have been TAILOR made by man. I seem to remember experiments with TAILOR made bits of DNA in UK injections that left nearly everyone DEAD and those that survived wishing they were DEAD. I must look closer at the more than 3 500 pages of my ADVERSE EFFECTS to GARDASIL. Perhaps there are unsubstantiated claims of similar deaths? And thousands of unsubstantiated claims of HARM. Thousands and thousands of people dropping dead, becoming ill AFTER gardasil all to prove they are LIARS and one highly ETHICAL, GARDASIL EXPERT is right. There are no adverse effects to GARDASIL. EVERYONE is having one big joke at GARDASIL's expense and trying to prove an HONORABLE man is a LIAR. It's a close call. But someone has to be sensible and say who is the LIAR. ANOTHER thing: GARDASIL prevents CANCER. PROVE THIS CAPLAN! Dont use the: French Government: OR The French regulatory authorities: AS ADVERTS in France claiming prevention of CANCER by HPV vaccine is ILLEGAL. Simply because it isn't TRUE. The vaccine is over hyped and like all BAD VACCINE REACTIONS suffered by the MILLIONS who take vaccines. EVERY one or 100 per cent are TOTALLY DENIED. Because no honest person can ever say there is 100 per cent PROOF. But in the same way no one can ever PROVE they are NOT responsible for all the millions of cases of harm and millions unheard of effects. The aluminium in gardasil takes four years to affect people and most safety tests STOP after 90 days. HUMANS are the ultimate TEST which PROVE danger but by this time the ranks of vaccine companies, government and regulators close ranks and leave the VICTIMS to their MISERY, POVERTY and OFTEN SUDDEN DEATH from some unknown cause but NEVER will it be placed accurately at VACCINIDES door. CAPLAN knows his ETHICS and VACCINIDES morals are alway the WINNER. It's a CLOSE call but: THIS World is full off BAR STEWARDS. Caplan says NO ONE has ever had a bad reaction to GARDASIL! He merrily says: HPV stands for HELP PAY for VIOXX So what does CAPLAN stand for? Talking of which isn't VIOXX actually REALLY, REALLY REALLY SAFE. I thought it was just the poor VICTIMS who couldn't use it right and DROPPED dead giving it a BAD NAME. In England there have been thousands dead or ill from their SILLY usage of the stuff. I mean if you trust Big HARMA ENOUGH SAID! How many millions have the UK harmed got from MERCK? I can tell you ZILCH, ZERO, FOUR XXXX all. Not one cent has passed from MERCK to these people. ETHICS or BIOETHICS CAPLAN? MIGHT is RIGHT, EVERY TIME. What does CAPLAN stand for? Or more importantly. WHO does he stand for? Certainly NOT one of those in that more than 3 500 page booklet on harm to date from GARDASIL Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.