Barry

[Guest guest]

HALF WRIGHT!

Barry .

His RESULTS are TOTALLY FINE (well

let's be generous, although they could have been better done)

INTERPRETATION TOTALLY FALSE (totally

denying exactly what the data tell us; that mercury is heavily

involved in autism children)

Barry and his blinded sight

research

http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0029547

The February 2012 research looks at

mercury content and autism using a double blinded study. The results

are therefore not theoretically or pyschologically altered to fit any

theory or so we hope. They present STARK condemnation of man's

pollution of the planet with MERCURY.

The team's interpretation of their own

results however clearly shows the motive that mercury vaccines are

BEYOND SUSPICION as being harmful to babies. Even to the extent of

having to lie about the interpretation of clear EVIDENCE OF MERCURY

HARM. The blame is clearly MERCURY, alone or with accomplices (LEAD,

ALUMINIUM et al). As vaccines still contain in February 2012 TOO MUCH

mercury, none of which is actually needed is beside the question

here.

The paper is therefore schizophrenic or

has a mental block on clear this EVIDENCE OF HARM.

Evidence of the harm of THIMEROSAL,

maybe also, one known source of neurotoxic mercury which is as said

UNECESSARILY added to our vaccines and has been known since its first

use back in the 1930's when it killed 100 per cent of the people it

was tested on to be LETHAL as well.

The first use of « safety »

testing to prove safety by stopping a trial while all the

participants are STILL in perfect health. A cynical action when

actually looking for harm, repeated many times since. There is no

harm after one day from THIMEROSAL. They are ALL in perfect HEALTH.

Note in fine tradition the product at the time was known as

MERTHIOLATE. Like all dangerous products, change the name half a

dozen times, tell the world you have finished with this killer a

dozen times: And all is well to continue its « merry »

path to HELL for the INNOCENTS.

Vaccines today are normally tested for

a maximum of 90 days, sufficient time for this first trial to obtain

the 100 per cent mortality of thimerosal's first expedition into

human health effects but not enough to track for cancer after

vaccines which can still commence in as little as 9 months or so. The

vaccine is perfectly safe for use on babies just forget the one in

500 dead bodies as its less than the control rate. A PERFECTLY SAFE

VACCINE and in RECORD time. Pity about AIDS vaccines? Pity about

MALARIA vaccine. And even more a pity for TB vaccine of which we did

have a good one when I was given it 50 years ago. Today you just get

TB and suffer quietly, with your bankrupting bills for medicaments

that cure NOTHING..

These adverse vaccine effects were rare

and for my vaccines back in the fifties there were subtle

differences. The known and accepted value for harm was one event in

50 million, the vaccine was given at age 5 YEARS first and injected

just under the skin so problems if any (there weren't any) would be

apparent at this site.

Today we normally give up to a dozen

vaccines at once, some with half a dozen active pathogens and at any

age from one DAY and often before 4 MONTHS the baby resembles a pin

cushion. The theory possibly being any harm cannot be communicated

except by SCREAMING.

There are a raft of clinical tests

proving HARM from many of todays vaccines at a level around 100 per

cent. Such is the level that the recent GARDASIL was passed as fit

for purpose with false claims of its action and an event rate of more

than 80 per cent. And of course 100 per cent protection from anyone

trying to claim they had been harmed. The result is that even with a

now 3 500 list of those harmed the official accepted number in one

country and from 5 years use is ZERO adverse effects. All those

people are LIARS some of which have actually died LYING about the bad

effects of GARDASIL. The problem is tests to prove the harm of

vaccines are considered below the belt tactics as the Big Pharma's

are doing their best. I think they too may have lost or disordered

brains?

Barry and his team have

continued the tradition by proving HARM and then in the discussion

claiming PROOF of no harm. Looking at his results and then the write

up or discussion you get the feeling that there is a total disconnect

from REALITY.

How is it done?

The first pass is to examine plain

mercury levels and show that in every case the amount of mercury

found in autism children is 3 to 4 times LESS than in NORMAL

children. We know that MERCURY in the BRAIN stays there. The team DID

NOT measure mercury in the brain (DIFFICULT!) but measure the ability

of people to get rid of this NEUROTOXIC metal. Normal people get rid

of this stuff at a rate 3 to 4 times faster than AUTISM children. How

does this equate to proving mercury is not harming autism children?

We are in some dark world where clear evidence of mercury harm is

being passed off as evidence of its protective effect. All this has

been proven years before but here we just see that there is no

mercury problem. TRUE if mercury resting in the BRAIN and being a

known NEUROTOXIN is good for the health of autism children.

It's a close call and this team of a

dozen or so say its JUST FINE for them.

Others including simple chemists like

me thing the ancients were right:

MERCURY takes AWAY your MIND.

So much for PROGRESS.

Barry and the simple mercury

tests show that MERCURY is heavily involved with AUTISM. He may have

be convinced along with many others in charge of our health that

mercury is good for us. But we did used to think it was BAD for our

health. So why are modern government officials and regulators happy

to inject a NEUROTOXIN into us when we knew the consequences 2 000

years ago?

Barry and his team show that for

autism children the mercury is STUCK in their bodies (brains) and

won't come out in normal circumstances.

Mercury is a RARE metal and until

modern times (1800 onwards) was not a health problem to man. Since

then it has found use in medications, dental fillings, additives to

vaccines, pressure and temperature measurement devices, electrical

switches, lights, industrial processes and even in childrens toys. In

addition an increasing practice of burning off the mercury in peoples

bodies when they die. Gradually being removed from all these it

resistantly stays in 2012 vaccines alongside other matter that

increases its effects (neurotoxic or brain destroying effects) 40

times to 100 times depending on which material and how much.

The effect of all this has been to make

mercury change from an element found in one mine in a deep hole in

Spain to an element pervasive and present throughout the world and

concentrated near the poles exposing those who don't use it to much

danger although never having the benefit of a mercury vaccine or

grams of the pure metal a cm or so from their brains.

Mercury ADVERSELY affects us today from

now being part of every fishes biochemical makeup and passing along

the food chain to the end user: MAN. In the 1960's we saw this effect

with DDT and the destruction especially of birds of prey. Today we

SEE or as Barry s team shows WE FAIL to see, the pernicious

effect of mercury on the modern birds or CANARIES called our children

or the aged amongst us especially the males among us.

Further and again still LARGELY

unconsidered is the effect of POLAR mercury on the destruction of

OZONE ( hundreds of thousands of OZONE molecules destroyed per

SECOND) and the knock on effect of global warming. How convenient to

use man's folly to RAISE more TAX from the victims of this pollution.

It's carbon dioxide really! My eye!

Barry s team then moved on to the

creatinine mercury test. A test which they themselves admitted was

not done correctly. Is it wonder? However even with an incorrect test

this again showed clear EVIDENCE of MERCURY HARM. Disparagely called

OUTLIERS by the team. Levels of mercury in the outliers found

in AUTISTIC children which could be nothing but harmful and which

were NOT found in ANY normal child. Anyone familiar with Epstein

research results on Pinks Disease and mercury will realise the

SIGNIFICANCE of a few lone findings. To be fair probably no one in

the world will still know of EPSTEIN and in the West any mention even

of PINKS is subject to ABUSE by critics. Why mention mercury and the

harm it no longer does. My eye!

http://archive.samj.org.za/1953%20VOL%20XXVII%20Jul-Dec/Articles/03%20September/3.10%20PINK%20DISEASE%20AND%20TEETHING%20POWDERS.Dr.B.Epstein.pdf

As Barry 's results show but his

analysis refuses to ACCEPT. Mercury is still here, still causing

injury but from 1 in 500 it now affects 1 in 100 and condemns TENS OF

MILLIONS to a RUINED life for which apologists claim:

WE NEED TO THANK GOD FOR.

We actually NEED to thank the culprit:

MERCURY

And THOSE who are happy to force us to

inject NEUROTOXINS into our infants.

MERCURY a KNOWN and POWERFUL NEUROTOXIN

with effects from ONE molecule arriving in the wrong place in our

bodies.

The effect of the continued and pig

headed use of this material often as in vaccines is completely

USELESS except no to make the perpetrator PIG HEADED but to make tens

of millions of the next generation with DISORDERED brains we call

AUTISM.

And in our BLINDED love for a

NEUROTOXIN We claim:

It is not harmful.

And our interpretation of test results

prove it is protective.

They prove no such protection:

EXCEPT:

for an industry better named:

BIG HARMA.

Tens of millions of damaged children

due to failure to test or failure to understand test results.

THANK YOU:

BIG HARMA.

But results dont lie:

ONLY:

False MISINTERPRETATION.

Barry ,

HALF WRIGHT