[FAME Systems] Corrected Email - Draft Review of Lyons' Vaccines are effective, save many lives

[Guest guest]

Dear

Lyons and the Letter Reader at MTExpress.com,

Correction: Link in

original was found to be corrupted by site QA reviewer; link

revised; e-mail resent.

   On

'balance', Lyons' 5 February

2012 piece on the MTExpress.com website titled, "Vaccines are

effective,

save many lives", appears to be an example of unsubstantiated

and

unsubstantiable pro-vaccine propaganda typical of the average

media vaccine

acolyte.

   As such, this article did not meet this reviewer's

expectations for a medical doctor who is board-certified in

family practice and

claims to use a scientific approach to the issues that she

discusses.

   Moreover, the statements made in this article diverge from

the

facts as this researcher, who has spent more than a decade in

studying the

science as well as working with others to publish peer-reviewed

articles

addressing key vaccine/vaccination issues, understands them.

   An in-depth, passage by passage, review that provides the

evidence

that supports the preceding assertions can be found at DrftRevu_VaccinesAreEffective_SaveManyLives_b.pdf.

     As with all

of my in-depth reviews, the "Introductory

Remarks" include the following passage,

      "Finally,

should anyone find any significant factual error in this review

for which they

have

       independent [a], scientifically sound,

peer-reviewed published substantiating documents,

       please   submit that information to this reviewer

so that he can improve his understanding

       of factual reality and, where appropriate, revise his

views and this review.

          [a]  To qualify, the study should be

published by researchers who have no conflicts of interest from

                 their ties to either those

commercial entities who profit from the sale of vaccines or

those entities,

                

academic, commercial or governmental, who actively promote

inoculation programs

using

                

vaccines."

   Hopefully,

you

will provide an in-depth fact- and science- based rebuttal to

those

statements for which you or your colleagues and supporters have

and can provide

qualified  documents (see footnote "[a]"),

which support

the assertions in your cited article and/or correct any

significant factual

error in my review so that you may improve my understanding of

factual reality

and help me to revise my views and my review of your article as

published on

MTExpress.com

  

Respectfully,

G. King, PhD

http://www.dr-king.com

The Reviewer and Founder, FAME Systems

PS: If you want a "doc" copy to more easily copy out elements in

a

manner that preserves their fidelity,

       then you need only send an e-mail with:

"REVULyons_PGK" in the subject line.