Guest guest Posted July 21, 2012 Report Share Posted July 21, 2012 H1N1 vaccines good for you MERCK, GSK, WYETH, BAXTER et al When the flu vaccine was given to USA pregnant mothers the number of COMPLAINTS of spontaneous abortions went BALLISTIC. Of course it is not possible to check if this actually meant that the vaccine INDUCED spontaneous abortions or whether it was a COINCIDENCE. That famous Danish team went to our rescue and showed that H1N1 vaccine is SUPER SAFE for pregnant mothers and their babies. We have the POWER of 2012 research and UNBIASED approach to SOLVING the BALLISTICS problem; http://jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=1216475 2012 July Risk of Adverse Fetal Outcomes Following Administration of a Pandemic Influenza A(H1N1) Vaccine During Pregnancy Conclusions In this Danish cohort, exposure to an adjuvanted influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 vaccine during pregnancy was not associated with a significantly increased risk of major birth defects, preterm birth, or fetal growth restriction. Note the word SIGNIFICANT. Does this mean that there were less damage to the new born infant but we can't say for sure that the child in the womb was DEFINITELY PROTECTED as claimed if you remember beforehand by those HARMA companies, BIG ones that is. It was NECESSARY to vaccinate to SAVE the child from NASTIES. So they SAID. The research then would show this PROTECTION but not enough it seems to SIGNIFICANTLY save us from NASTIES for the child it appears. So avoiding all the masses of words and data in this fine document I went to the back to see how no deaths from vaccines to hundreds of deaths from vaccines for the unborn child was ACTUALLY protecting that dead child from NASTIES. Deep in the middle of comments comes this little gem Our study did not include abortions or stillbirths. Hang on: Deaths put down to the H1N1 went BALLASTIC but this careful study, getting rid of confounders etc etc did not give one HOOT for the dead babies after getting their PROTECTIVE vaccines which went from sometimes ZERO in a year to the deaths of more than a HUNDRED. Just for one country out of HUNDREDS. What kind of careful study is this? What is the effect if you get raw data and ignore the confounders? WE WILL NEVER KNOW? I was looking forward to a study which showed the PROTECTION from H1N1 vaccines for the dead child in the womb and explained the fallacy which even I can see but the Danish team SPECIFICALLY avoided this, while CONDEMNING all other research done. Bizarre that. I am sorry but HAVE I time to read ADULTERATED GARBAGE? Well yes I did and what did I see but this: with more than double the rate of major birth defects So for some pregnant mothers the effect of the H1N1 vaccine was to MORE THAN DOUBLE the MAJOR BIRTH DEFECTS. So here we have it: The protection effect of an H1N1 vaccine is to more than double the major birth defects and as for deaths give it a miss please. So there we have it: H1N1 protects by doubling the birth defects of a MAJOR nature. BIZARRE that! Now this report is peer reviewed etc etc and ACTUALLY shows that vaccines are good for us. Well thats the CLAIM! WELL if you believe in PROPAGANDA: We already KNOW: THERE IS ZERO RISK FROM ANY VACCINE. Sorry THERE IS ABSOLUTELY ZERO RISK FROM 1 000's OF VACCINES given at one time also. Nice to know isnt it. I have put in for my next 1 000 vaccines with an appointament date of 2222. By that time perhaps they will have got it RIGHT. WRONG! H1N1 vaccines good for you So the maekers tell us And so the RESEARCHERS prove for them. H1N1 vaccines REALLY good for you MERCK, GSK, Wyeth, Baxter et al Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.