GSK and their ADMISSION of EVIDENCE OF HARM

[Guest guest]

GSK and vaccines

Our (GSK) MISSION ….

Argentina just disagreed with GSK that

their vaccines are SAFE.

In England for sure, the police spend a

lot of time and money analysing bedding, clothing and how the parents

always seem to murder their newly born infants in exactly the same

manner immediately after spending time and trouble getting their

vaccines literally hours before their deadly DEEDS.

But more than three years ago GSK

actually published a 21 month study of their new HPV vaccine to prove

how SAFE this new vaccine was.

THOMAS VERSRAETEN may be known to a few

people. Do you remember when this person proved that MERCURY vaccines

caused AUTISM.

The relationships were coming out at

fantastic levels of COINCIDENCE. Sometimes for some similar diseases

the correlation topped 200-fold.

He tried on his own to shake off this

coinicidence. He could not. So the CDC called a conference of EXPERTS

to look at the data. Some comments from this meeting have gone down

into the annals of folklore but my favourite was the one about: Don't

TELL. In a fortnight a properly printed summary would be publicised.

Well they LIED. It was more than THREE YEARS on, when the FINAL

REPORT was published.

In breathtaking detail it showed how

MERCURY had this effect on babies. It protected them from DYING and

from getting AUTISM. Not to me the MUDDLE of epidemiology in research

into MIND and BODY, so much as MEDDLE.

Anyway, as they say, that's HISTORY.

So I was interested to see what kind of

JOB, V had made with his epidemiology on HPV vaccines

See:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18845199

Analysis of adverse events of potential

autoimmune aetiology in a large integrated safety database of ASO4

adjuvanted vaccines

Verstraeten plus seven others.

All accessible by emails given. All

workers for GSK. Their results demonstrated

A low rate of

autoimmune disorders without evidence of an increase

in relative risk

associated with ASO4 adjuvanted vaccines.

All perfectly clear?

Anyone who doesn't have time to read

the article would have clear reason to believe this adjuvant is the

safest thing put into vaccines since MERCURY? Right! WRONG!

There seems a DISCONNECT between this

statement and what the paper shows. Best described by that little

word: LIAR.

Perhaps, I am unable to decipher what

the report says. Can anyone help me run through it?

The team mention the ABSENCE of DISEASE

today in our world. GREAT!

They AGREE a VACCINE must be SAFE.

GREAT!

We can all agree, we dont want rises in

infectious or non-infectious diseases.

We DO want SAFE vaccines. How we Want.

And WANT and WANT and WANT.

We don't want to be FORCED into

vaccines that may perhaps be DANGEROUS.

I remember distinctly fifty years ago

getting my vaccines. Yes, just the one (at a time). And at age 6

years when I worked out the risk of 1 in 50 000 000 was JUST

acceptable to me with my WHOLE life before me. I was fighting fit,

well fed and nourished and I was going to sit STILL for days maybe a

week after before wheeling my arms about or kicking footballs around.

And do you know what? I wasn't that 1

person in the haystack that got the SHORT STRAW. I was safe, unharmed

and: PROTECTED.

Today with TECHNOLOGY those odds have

of course changed dramatically. No longer need you worry of 1 adverse

event in 50 000 000.

Today your chance of HARM have

radically CHANGED. This GSK investigation puts it clearly at the mere

risk of 1 adverse event in less than 200. Well there you go again.

BACKWARD TECHNOLOGY with a vengeance.

The events come in three main

categories

1 Thyroid

2 Muscle Pains

OR

3 Nerve

They come with handles like:

Multiple Sclerosis

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Basedow's Disease

Idiopathic Thrombocytopenic Purpura

Not only can you impress your friends

from the hospital bed, the modern equivalent of the Iron Lung, comes

in a portable sized box today or if you are lucky from your

wheelchair.

You can impress yourself at how much

money you have. I never realised I had 3 million dollars (needed to

maintain some sort of life).

Arthritis comes out TOP FAVOURITE. So

now you can't open bottles, get dressed and that pain! PAIN, PAIN,

PAIN.

From a study on HEALTHY and FIT young

people about the size of a small town there were hundreds of

casualties in well under TWO years when the trails stopped and

patients were abandoned to their fate (for the UNLUCKY 300 to 400 or

so). Now if you know the theory of how aluminium harms, you realise

that these EVENTS could be FOUR years after your vaccine. Is this a

case of stopping tests before the ROOF falls in? And those background

rates? Are they background rates or like AUTISM have they gone

through the ROOF since aluminium vaccines spliced with OILY vaccines

came in? Either way vaccines USE and ABUSE has in the last 20 years

progressed in a way NEVER seen before.

No one has ever shown either:

Aluminium adjuvants

OR

Oily adjuvants to be safe.

EVER.

But here the makers GSK have put the

TWO dangerous adjuvants together and come up with a completely SAFE

one. INCREDIBLE! UNBELIVABLE! SIMPLY UNTRUE!

LIARS. LIARS. LIARS. Every one of them.

STEVENS-JOHNSON SYNDROME nearly forgot

this one. There is such a long list of DISEASES to get from your GSK

vaccine. With two separate GSK products the conclusion was the same

for both. An INFINITELY increased risk of getting this from a GSK

product. WOW! WOW! WOW! Has anyone thought of putting in for a grant

on MODELLING SJS?

I mean the results are so much DYNAMITE

that you might wonder how V could put his name to this paper.

He made a much better DEMOLITION job for MERCURY in 2003 Pediatrics.

Hold on! Don't forget when all these

SICK girls complain, GSK will show this paper, explain the small

print and say:

Why didn't you READ the SMALL PRINT.

We explain VERY GRAPHICALLY your RISK

(1 in 200) and

take our share guide and you can see

the BENFIT.

Yes all these companies SPELL out VERY

CLEARLY the RISKS.

Why are there so many LEMMINGS around?

Perhaps 1 in 200 is WORTH IT?

It's YOUR CHOICE.

But how much is ONE share for GSK. I

dont think they are what you might call PENNY shares?

ALL the following are CLEARLY at higher

levels than the BACKGROUND and I hypothesise the background is the

FALL OUT from how many VACCINES before of HOW LONG ago? A proper

background for a disease unheard of in olden times must by necessity

be ZERO?

MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS

SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS

ERYTHEMA

BASEDOW DISEASE

THYROID

IDIOPATHIC THROMBOCYTOPENIC PURPURA

STEVENS JOHNSONS SYNDROME

ENCEPHILITIS

MYASTENIA GRAVIS

PROCTITIS ULCERATIVE

ARTHRITIS

SCLERODOMA

ANAEMIA

SARCOIDOSIS

UVEITIS

All of these, I repeat, are at a HIGHER

RISK than the background if you SKIP the vaccine.

But TOMORROWS barrier thanks to this

VACCINE will provide a higher SAFETY barrier for GSK to hide behind.

From a SMALL town sized sample,

HANDPICKED to be in the peak of health.

As compared to those VICTIMS facing

this vaccine:

Age NINE. NO PROBLEM. Roll up your

sleeves.

Feeling unwell. NO PROBLEM. Roll up

your sleeves.

Already got one of the above? NO

PROBLEM. Roll up your sleeves.

Seizures with vaccines. NO PROBLEM.

Roll up your sleeves.

And of course the CLASSIC.

You missed the repeat vaccine.

You are NOT VACCINATED.

Go BACK TO START! Roll up your both

sleeves and put your best leg forward..

There is one BRIGHT spot for GSK.

They managed to get:

GULLAIN-BARRE SYNDROME

as VACCINE UNRELATED!

Imagine an ADVERSE reaction and

serious lifelong disease of which the ONLY known cause is VACCINES!

But V has proved his vaccine will PROTECT you.

A novel VACCINE with NEUROTOXIC

ALUMINIUM and an oil that hopefully isn't PEANUT OIL or FREUNDS

ADJUVANT (an oil LETHAL for humans) or SQUALENE (regarded by

independent observers as culpable for GWS and illegal in USA vaccines

but strangely fit for say the French nation in 2009) is SAFE.

Anyway in good Verstraeten tradition:

Not today: Vaccines with mercury

prevent autism!

But GSK vaccines prevent Guillain-Barre

Syndrome! (And it does this by GIVING you the disease at greatly

reduced levels. GREAT!).

So to conclude: My idea of this

research DOES NOT CONCUR with that of GSK nor of Versraeten.

And I don't intend to subject myself to

a vaccine which gives an INFINITE increase in NINE serious and life

lasting diseases just to be one more LEMMING for GSK.

If you multiple the risks inherent from

21 months of harm to a lifetime your risk of these dreadful diseases

is not 1 in 200 but MUCH, MUCH, MUCH higher than this already

UNACCEPTABLE level.

I can't remember teaching classes full

of autistic, neurological, muscular-skelatal, and thyroid deregulated

children but as they say:

TIMES THEY ARE A CHANGIN'

Go and get your SAFE vaccine as

GUARANTEED by GSK if you DARE.

Don't take my word for it that you are

looking GENOCIDE in the mouth, arm or legs.

Our (GSK) MISSION ….

GSK and vaccines

Full unexpuragted version here:

http://qbit.cc/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/oil-adjuvant-safety-GSK.pdf