Scientists Sue Merck: allege fraud, mislabeling, and false certification of MMR vaccine. Suzanne Humphries, MD

[Guest guest]

http://www.vaccinationcouncil.org/2012/06/25/scientists-sue-merck-allege-fraud-mislabeling-and-false-certificaion-of-mmr-vaccine-suzanne-humphries-md/

Scientists Sue Merck: allege fraud, mislabeling, and false certification

of MMR vaccine. Suzanne Humphries, MD– June 25,

2012Posted in:

Articles

Print

PDF

Vaccinationists tell us we don’t understand science. Well maybe they are

right. “Science” in the world of vaccines could mean, throwing out

results that don’t fit the desired outcome, throwing out the evidence

before the FDA comes to inspect, offering bonuses to scientists to

deliver the necessary results …I was the head technician in a

biochemistry lab for two years prior to medical school, yet I never saw

science carried out like that. Maybe Temple University was just a bit

behind the times in its evolution of “science.”

This is the story of the MMR vaccine and two Merck scientists who

filed a lawsuit in 2010 over Merck’s efforts to allegedly “defraud the

United States through Merck’s ongoing scheme to sell the government a

mumps vaccine that is mislabeled, misbranded, adulterated and falsely

certified as having an efficacy rate that is significantly higher than it

actually is.” Merck allegedly did this from 2000 onwards in order to

maintain its exclusive license to sell the MMR vaccine and keep its

monopoly of the US market.

Folks, if you haven’t already heard this elsewhere, this is HUGE news.

HERE is ’s excellent account of the ordeal as well as

both the 2010 and 2012 official legal complaints.

In the complaint, the scientists outline in great detail exactly how

Merck manipulated the efficacy results in order to be able to say they

had a 95% effective vaccine so that they could meet the fairytale goal of

vaccine-induced “herd immunity by 2010.” Well, it turns out that the

vaccine could not meet the goal that CDC projected to eradicate mumps by

2010, BECAUSE the vaccine, in its current state cannot reliably confer

immunity, and is in fact a dilute version of what it once was when

Maurice Hilleman invented it using the virus of his five year old

daughter. The same viral mumps strain has been in use in every mumps or

MMR vaccine Merck has made since 1967.

In order to mass-produce live but non-infective vaccine virus, the “wild”

virus from 1967 has had to be “passaged” through different cells or

animals over and over and over. In that passaging, mutations take place

that render the virus non-infective or “attenuated” but also, those many

years of passaging the same original viral strain has lowered the

antigenicity, or the antibody-stimulating capacity of the virus.

When testing was performed to show the efficacy (neutralizing antibody

provoking potential) of the forty-year-old virus strain, for use in the

newer combination mumps vaccines, Merck’s scientists could not produce a

95% efficacy rate.

Merck got the old virus to pass its new tests by doing three things.

First they tested efficacy on the vaccine strain virus and not the wild

virus as had previously been done. The testing is done by vaccinating

children and testing the ability of their blood to neutralize the virus

before and after the vaccine. There should be a marked difference between

the two tests. For the new testing method, the children’s blood was

tested for its ability to neutralize the virus, using the vaccine strain

virus, instead of the wild type strain that is much more infective, and

the one that your children would most likely catch. By using a weaker

virus, the old vaccine strain virus allowed the neutralization to occur

much more easily. But still it was not 95% effective.

In order to make the blood pass the test, antibodies from rabbits was

added. The addition of rabbit antibody increased the efficacy to 100%.

But that was not the end, because the test has to be done on pre-vaccine

blood and post-vaccine blood. Just the addition of rabbit antibody made

the pre-vaccine blood go from 10% positive to 80% positive and that was

such an obvious sign of foul play that yet another manipulation had to be

made. The desired end result is to have very low pre-vaccine antibody and

95% or more post-vaccine efficacy as measured by antibody neutralization.

So…yet one more change in procedure was made: The pre-vaccine tests were

all redone. None of the post vaccine tests and none of the pre-vaccine

negatives were redone, just the pre-vaccine positives. According to the

Merck scientists, they did this by fabricating the “plaque” counts on the

pre-vaccine blood samples, counting plaques that were not there. What

this allowed was a mathematical dilution of the pre-vaccine positive

blood counts.

While this alleged fraudulent activity was occurring in Merck’s labs, two

courageous scientists voiced their objection. They claim to have been

told that if they called the FDA they would be jailed. They were also

reminded of the very large bonuses that were on the way after the

vaccines were certified.

If what these scientists claim is true, the net result of Merck’s

questionable activity was epidemics and outbreaks. It is known that the

mumps component of all MMR vaccines from the mid 1990’s has had a very

low efficacy, estimated at 69% (Harling 05). The outbreaks started in UK

and Europe in 1998. USA’s outbreaks began in 2006.

These mumps outbreaks have already been proven NOT to be the result of

failure to vaccinate, but vaccination failure … and now it looks to all

be a result of Merck’s cooked books, used in order to maintain a

commercial monopoly to generate increased revenue from increasing numbers

of boosters.

Sheri Nakken, former R.N., MA, Hahnemannian

Homeopath

Vaccination Information & Choice Network, Washington State, USA

Vaccines -

http://vaccinationdangers.wordpress.com/ Homeopathy

http://homeopathycures.wordpress.com

Vaccine Dangers, Childhood Disease Classes & Homeopathy

Online/email courses - next classes start July 12