KING CANUTE? Anaphylaxis: Lots in 1900 but today its all gone: Erased by government decrees

[Guest guest]

ANAPHYLAXIS DOES NOT EXIST IN 2012

BUT WAS A NORMAL EVENT 100 YEARS AGO

At the beginning of the 20th

century Richet showed for dogs but not humans that

ANAPHYLAXIS was the normal event of a repeat vaccine.

The reasons and methods for this

ADVERSE and LETHAL effect were found by many researchers around this

time.

Since then we have found many

biochemical and enzyme markers to test for persons suffering from

anaphylaxis but in the bizarre art of vaccines it is all but

forbidden to use science to check for this life threatening state.

Humans do not necessarily follow this

path to ANAPHYLAXIS in the same sudden way except in very rare

instances and the methods for innoculation are not exactly comparable

as yesterday skin and blood injections are different to muscle

injections most used now.

ANAPHYLAXIS is REAL and LIFE

THREATENING to all creatures but even this observed and repeatable

finding took doctors more than a hundred years to discover and prove

was real.

Today in USA and England the number of

anaphyactic events after paediatric vaccines is close to zero. That

is the observed immediate type. The recent English experience of

reviewing cases was of ZERO after vaccines for babies while the USA

experience admits to a range from a likely rate of 1 in 2 million to

an improbable 20 in a million cases.

Any of these rates would be a

reasonable chance for a fit and well child to take. But would it be

acceptable for underweight, undernourished, vitamin deficient babies

who have to get between 25 to 50 vaccines multiplying up the risks.

In any event this number comes out at

around one case per year in USA and no cases in England each year.

But are there hidden or unrecognised fatal and non-fatal cases.

But are we at the place of a decade

before Richet and others discovered this effect of vaccines? We are

unaware of delayed anaphylaxis and unaware we are unaware.

Both UK and USA research groups

effectively use a system which rejects almost any case as

ANAPHYLACTIC. We are not sure if all cases get reported and here we

are sorting out cases by denial even though we NEVER saw the case

which a doctor who did said WAS anaphylaxis. A sort of committed

effect of accepting harm as not harm.

The USA reject any events which come

after 4 hours unless they involve damage to multiple organs in the

body. It's a case of we don't understand the science and biochemistry

of the human body but can pontificate that more than half of the

observations were wrong and there were no missed cases.

Also if any person gets through the

shock of anaphylaxis without medical help they are denied the belief

that they in fact had any reaction to the vaccine. Baby FAKERS or

pyschogenic cases?

The best you get in USA is a PROBABLE

event. NO definite cases anywhere to be seen.

A world full of Supermen and

WonderWomen?

Ie in the UK, NO cases of anaphylaxis

occur in the baby vaccine schedule and in the USA there are no

CERTAIN anaphylactic events just maybe the odd case in every few

million.

I submit modern society does not

believe in a best case or worse case system for vaccine affects but a

TOTAL denial stance. THERE ARE NO ADVERSE EVENTS.

There is no way that we in our present

modern society that we will admit to anaphylaxis for babies.

SIDS moved from nearly 2 000 a year in

the UK to that of ALL cases were murder by carers. As to ANAPHYLAXIS,

none seen for a hundred years. The time of that MAN Richet. He and

his kind would be hung, drawn and quartered in the modern medical

climate.

As a person who has spoken to many who

had terrible reactions IMMEDIATELY after baby vaccines then it

appears either I am a liar or those charged with protecting millions

of babies from vaccine harm are lying?

My key case which at first I thought

was a callous murdering mom was that of Harry vaccinated at

4.30pm and dead by 10.30pm and again this goes down in UK vaccine

history as one that had NO ADVERSE effects for Harry. The record

clearly shows a brutal murder by the late Sally . The

« callousness » coming direct from the medical experts.

I have to say that for me this is or

was an ANAPHYLACTIC event but for authority to admit this would make

a mockery of the then and 2012 position that there are ABSOLUTELY no

anaphylactic events after baby vaccines. All SIDS are just

UNEXPLAINABLE.

Was Richet and around 250

research doctors mistaken in the first ten years or so of the 20th

century? Not a chance.

Or are todays vaccine doctors LYING?

Every chance.

There are very CLEAR biochemical

methods to detect if someone is enduring ANAPHYLACTIC shock. What do

the medical profession say of doing such testing? THEY SERVE

ABSOLUTELY no use and MUST NOT be done.

Why should this be?

IgE is one measure for anaphylaxis or

the risk thereof and for MANY vaccines the single clear event is

EXACTLY a rise in IgE levels.

Anaphylaxis is life threatening and as

expected there are HUGE biochemical changes occurring. Why don't we

look for these in babies after vaccines?

If we look, it is not that we would not

find but that we would find.

While authority tells us the rate of

ANAPHYLAXIS is ZERO in the UK and around 1 case in 2 million in USA

it is a fact that more than 1 in a 100 have ALLERGY and therefore

perhaps anaphylaxis does occur and like those REJECTED totally

because there was no medical treatment they go UNRECOGNISED.

The vaccine art can be equated to that

in the world ten years or more before the research of Richet

and 250 other medical researchers.

In 2012 ANAPHYLAXIS is NOT recognised

and has a virtually ZERO level of worry for doctors, government and

regulators.

1 million SIDS and ten million autism

childtren are the result of DENIAL of anaphylaxis by those charged

with the safety of modren vaccines.

Nowhere is this attiude more clearly

seen than at Le Roy at this time in 2012 where girls ONLY are missing

huge chunks of schooling because they are PHYSICALLY unwell, while

doctors, psychiatrists and authority are clear that they HAVE

absolutely NO REAL, REAL HEALTH ISSUES. We cannot be certain whether

vaccines or other factors are at work but this illness is shared by

possibly 20 per cent of the USA nation who are COMPLETELY HEALTHY.

More than one percent having ALLERGY to every bit of protein put in

modern vaccines.

Vaccines are safe and necessary but

denying harm for 999 out of 1 000 cases where people are worried for

their health AFTER vaccines like the Le Roy girls is ARROGANT, WRONG

and causing exactly the society we have today.

Lots of CANCERS

Lots of DIABETES

Lots of AUTISM

But just thank God for your health.

How true. Certainly don't thank your

DOCTOR whatever you do.

Science if it comes to multimillion

research into genes is fine. Not that anyone understands the juble of

thousands of four letter combinations.

But simple, cheap, effective

OBSERVATION, measurement of metals, enzymes and even head expansion

after vaccines is not done and frowned on.

Not coming out of the dark age so much

as going back at warp speed.

ANAPHYLAXIS WAS A NORMAL EVENT 100

YEARS AGO

BUT DOES NOT EXIST IN 2012

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16476188

Some worrying anaphylaxis type

reactions which are in fact NOTHING EVENTS. Were any biochemical

tests done to verify the statements here?

The

Australian rate of anaphylaxis in women following HPV vaccination is

2.6 per 100,000 doses. This 2008

report must be a lie? It doesn't fit with todays news that

anaphylaxis is now OFFICIALLY EXTINCT.

TORONTO

2009 — There have been 24 confirmed cases of a type of severe

allergic reaction called anaphylaxis in Canadians who have received

an H1N1 flu shot, including one person who died after getting

vaccinated, the head of the Public Health Agency of Canada said

Wednesday.

This in the year when there no baby

anaphylaxis events in the UK and here 24 confirmed in another country

for one vaccine only. You can be sure that this must be a lie? Well,

there are lies somewhere.

http://www.pediatricsdigest.mobi/content/112/4/815.full

American study that thinks no event is

DEFINITE but maybe 1 event in 2 million perhaps.

http://vran.org/health-risks/anaphylaxis-allergies-and-asthma/anaphylactic-children%E2%80%94canaries-in-the-public-health-mine-shaft/

Talks of regulators et al being unaware

of the work of Richet. For me the anaphylaxis is delayed by the

nature of how vaccines were and are now administered. Unaware of the

theoretical and actual consequences of inducing not immediate but

delayed anaphylaxis. Again simple measurements can tell us of this

simmering harm. Perhasp even epilepsy in ancient times is as the

result of stick injuries in war et al mimicking what is deliberately

done to every infant dozens of times over. Truly the canary very

visibly injured eg with autism to one per cent, diabetes, cancer, ME

etc etc.

Work of Dr M Coquet and the four years

for aluminium in muscle to present as injury.

For example see this in baby after

vaccine with aluminium

https://tspace.library.utoronto.ca/bitstream/1807/3663/1/pn04043.pdf

One of mountains of evidence of

aluminium harm in vaccines completely ignored to the point they

prefer these vaccines to known safe ones taken off the market. A rare

complication or rarely looked for? This technique is all but

forbidden in England and the USA. Unaware and again unaware of being

unaware. Or?

http://www.siaip.it/upload/Anaphylaxis%20to%20DTaP%20in%20CMA.pdf

One centre getting rather more

anaphylaxis than the country sees or is it they are not looking or

like the Le roy girls this doctor making a fuss where there is no

anaphylaxis. The best view, the worst view or just total denial of

harm?

http://www.petmd.com/dog/care/evr_dg_vaccination_reactions#.TzRHHU4U28A

Animals not exempted from anaphylactic

events that modern doctors claim virtually does not exist today. Or

is this faking too?

The IOM put out a 600 page report

claiming no adverse effects but getting to the fine detail perhaps

The

TT (Tetanus Toxoid) vaccine is also likely linked to causing

anaphylaxis and the Meningococcal vaccine is “convincinglyâ€

linked to causing anaphylaxis.

But not for public consumption unless

you take in a million words of everything is fine first.

And what set me off to check

anaphylaxis was the new 2012 UK study as mentioned which FAILS to

find ANY case of ANAPHYLAXIS in 5 million jabs over more than one

year in England.

http://medicalxpress.com/news/2012-01-anaphylactic-vaccination-extremely-rare.html

Going against established science we

now know:

ANAPHYLAXIS DOES NOT EXIST IN 2012