The disappearance of ANAPHYLAXIS

[Guest guest]

ANAPHYLAXIS EXISTED IN 1903

SO HOW CAN IT NOT EXIST IN ANTISEPTIC

2012?

Vaccine history is over a hundred years

old and if you accept ancient medical methods for health, it goes

back to times ancient.

Epilepsy for example might be

explainable as a side effect of this advanced medical techniques of

ancient times.

Vaccines today do serve valuable

purposes but their usage is vastly to the extent at which DENIAL of

harm is more strident than making SAFE vaccines. Quackery of today is

the ART of VACCINIDES. Protected by government and regulatory laws.

More than a hundred years ago, several

hundred medical researchers found and developed the idea of

ANAPHYLAXIS as the NORMAL but UNWANTED effect of repeat vaccines.

Professor Richet was one such

researcher who got the Nobel Prize for this work. His co-workers

could not believe this finding and the demonstration in front of them

was to inoculate a dog with less antigen than the previous month and

with the prediction that the animal would die. In disbelief the

assistants watched this very shocking event followed by death.

In the years that followed until today

much more work has been done both to understand this UNWANTED effect

and to control it. There are a plethora of biochemical tests today to

see if people are liable to suffer from anaphylaxis, to measure if it

is occurring and most important to halt and stop the deadly effect if

it is happening.

Nothing has changed with the ideas,

fact and happening of anaphylactic events. It is a very real effect

and it is not altogether certain how or why modern vaccines do not

induce large and larger numbers of anaphylactic events today. The

probability is they do occur but we choose NOT to look, not to accept

and certainly not investigate. Harm is unexplainables, coincidental

but never caused by vaccines.

We live in a world where most research

proves nothing, not sufficient evidence, meanings are unclear. But

when vaccines are involved we can add with total certainty:

neurotoxic mercury has only protective effects, neurotoxic aluminium?

Are you mad it's not like arsenic; if it was we would dio something.

And anaphylaxis, that's been erased by top government decrees as an

effect of vaccines.

Injections in the time of Richet were

of course often direct into the blood stream. Today, this is normally

absolutely not the thing to do. But how is it possible to be 100 per

cent certain that some of the vaccine might inadvertantly enter the

blood stream during a muscle injection. They stick the needle in,

possibly striking bone and dislodging the needle tip and never look

to see if it rests in a blood vessel. DO NOT ASPIRATE. Signs of blood

after a vaccine should elicit ALARM BELLS and warrant ACTION. This

ACTION is to my knowledge complete INACTION. Wipe of a tissue and

hope you get out of the surgery before dying.

How many cot deaths were preceded by

BLOODY injections?

A very recent 2012 UK report claims and

probably correctly so, that there were NO anaphylactic responses to

any pediatric UK vaccine during the 2008 – 2009 vaccine years or

the greater part of these years. Five to six million vaccines with NO

anaphylactic event. Surely a credible, necessary and essential

standard of safety. One to hold the vaccine doctors to, for sure.

We cannot have vaccines with even very

low levels of adverse effects for the consequences to the individuals

life is not remote and the very number of vaccines now given would

present a nation with one per cent of its people or may be more with

permanently ill or disordered children living lives where their

health needs and demands on the nation would be exorbitant except by

a policy of sidelining them from society possibly by eliciting that

they are FAKERS, that the illness is PYSCHSOMATIC and that they need

to pull themselves together. In any event in nearly every case the

carers pay in EVERY sense. The attitude of KANNER that the parents

are to blame has shifted somewhat to the present where the children

are now to blame. Anything from: It's a fault in your genes to the

simplistic enjoy what God has done to you. In France, old tradition

still lives on in 2012.

Anaphylaxis was the real event to EVERY

animal injected according to certain conditions explored by these

early scientists. They could repeat vaccinate without problems as

they worked out when and how this anaphylaxis would or would not

occur. It took time for this time bomb to arrive. Such techniques are

probably those in use today to reduce or eliminate anaphylactic

events. We follow a regime where anaphylaxis is at this ZERO level

but how many doctors or nurses are aware of the path which is safe

and the path to CERTAIN anaphylactic events? Not many. All events are

discarded by the doctors, vaccine harm does not exist and when your

tiny baby needs an operation to repair anaphylactic harm to one organ

or another, your confidence and trust in your doctor reaches new

peaks. His kidney operation saved his life. He was born with this

fault. Not damage from his vaccines. NO WAY.

Government dictates and doctors use

rules to determine whether anaphylaxis occurs. Like Canute they

decide whether these things are allowed to happen, just as the

ancient King would command the sea to halt and go back. Power is ALL

powerful. They basically consist of looking at time intervals, organs

affected and whether anti-anaphylactic drugs have been given. Also

there is the determination that NO CLINICAL TESTS are done to prove

or disprove that anaphylaxis has, is or was occurring. The excuse is

that it SERVES NO PURPOSE. They in fact succeed where Canute failed.

We are in MODERN TIMES.

The result of all this skullduggery is

that your doctor has the say so whether your child had or did not

have an anaphylactic event. The answer is ALWAYS the same. There was

NO anaphylactic event. Anaphylaxis like tides are now a thing that

used to happen but not in MODERN TIMES.

This cynicism continues. Harry

was innoculated at 4.30pm. Any slightly delayed anaphylactic events

occurring at or during his sleep. Very convenient that dirty deeds

are done at night. Death at 10.30pm at night means you get EMERGENCY

service treatment or basically NO proper medical treatment. A driver

doubles as your or rather the babies life saver. Further the timing

of this amateur intervention means such niceties as anaphylactic

events are long past their sell by date. We are now clearly entering

the time of murder by any or both in the household. In the event only

Mrs Sally took the double life for this anaphylactic event. A

plethora of tests would indicate even after death that anaphylaxis

had occurred but of course NONE was done. The clinical testing

cupboard was bare. Proof of murder? EASY; just get a few practised

well paid MEDICO-LEGAL EXPERTS to say: Yes! This is how it is done

and then turn to the mother and hey presto it works every time. And

then there is the POLICE investigation. Everything is investigated,

everything except the actions of nurses and doctors in the hours

before death. A SIDS investigation is basically: Can we pin this on a

carer? The actual murderers or those that gave an anaphylactic

injection are actually KEY to the police to bring a prosecution

against the mom or dad or both. Would you as a doctor say to the

police: Well its like this the vaccine was out of date, it was the

last dregs in the bottle coloured red with mercury as we never bother

to mix or shake but are LICENSED KILLERS like Bond and the

injection was to be frank one BLOODY mess. Or would you say, I think

mom did it, she looks like a murderer, she drinks like a fish and I

need 50 000 pounds for my yacht I want to buy. I will TESTIFY for you

in court.

One more vaccine anaphylactic event

turned into murder and a million such deaths later we are still

CERTAIN: There are NO anaphyklactic events after pediatric vaccines.

We have ZERO tests to prove it.

And AUTISM, well isn't that more money

for our MEDICO-LEGAL experts? We need to justify the non-stop

expansion of hospitals, well centres and pharmacies.

And we have those experts to assure us

with their knighthoods, lifelong professorships and 50 000 pounds a

time for their say in court, that all is WELL with WELL clinics and

VACCINES but all is not WELL with moms who have just spent months

preparing for baby, breaking the bank account and then turning round

and murdering the little darling straight after his first lots of

health giving vaccines as an underweight, premature baby and a

patient coming to the flu coughing nurses who didn't get their jabs

but are happy to turn your child into a pin cushion.

ANAPHYLAXIS IS NON-EXISTENT IN

ANTISEPTIC 2012

BUT ANAPHYLAXIS DID EXIST IN 1903