Guest guest Posted February 10, 2012 Report Share Posted February 10, 2012 ANAPHYLAXIS EXISTED IN 1903 SO HOW CAN IT NOT EXIST IN ANTISEPTIC 2012? Vaccine history is over a hundred years old and if you accept ancient medical methods for health, it goes back to times ancient. Epilepsy for example might be explainable as a side effect of this advanced medical techniques of ancient times. Vaccines today do serve valuable purposes but their usage is vastly to the extent at which DENIAL of harm is more strident than making SAFE vaccines. Quackery of today is the ART of VACCINIDES. Protected by government and regulatory laws. More than a hundred years ago, several hundred medical researchers found and developed the idea of ANAPHYLAXIS as the NORMAL but UNWANTED effect of repeat vaccines. Professor Richet was one such researcher who got the Nobel Prize for this work. His co-workers could not believe this finding and the demonstration in front of them was to inoculate a dog with less antigen than the previous month and with the prediction that the animal would die. In disbelief the assistants watched this very shocking event followed by death. In the years that followed until today much more work has been done both to understand this UNWANTED effect and to control it. There are a plethora of biochemical tests today to see if people are liable to suffer from anaphylaxis, to measure if it is occurring and most important to halt and stop the deadly effect if it is happening. Nothing has changed with the ideas, fact and happening of anaphylactic events. It is a very real effect and it is not altogether certain how or why modern vaccines do not induce large and larger numbers of anaphylactic events today. The probability is they do occur but we choose NOT to look, not to accept and certainly not investigate. Harm is unexplainables, coincidental but never caused by vaccines. We live in a world where most research proves nothing, not sufficient evidence, meanings are unclear. But when vaccines are involved we can add with total certainty: neurotoxic mercury has only protective effects, neurotoxic aluminium? Are you mad it's not like arsenic; if it was we would dio something. And anaphylaxis, that's been erased by top government decrees as an effect of vaccines. Injections in the time of Richet were of course often direct into the blood stream. Today, this is normally absolutely not the thing to do. But how is it possible to be 100 per cent certain that some of the vaccine might inadvertantly enter the blood stream during a muscle injection. They stick the needle in, possibly striking bone and dislodging the needle tip and never look to see if it rests in a blood vessel. DO NOT ASPIRATE. Signs of blood after a vaccine should elicit ALARM BELLS and warrant ACTION. This ACTION is to my knowledge complete INACTION. Wipe of a tissue and hope you get out of the surgery before dying. How many cot deaths were preceded by BLOODY injections? A very recent 2012 UK report claims and probably correctly so, that there were NO anaphylactic responses to any pediatric UK vaccine during the 2008 – 2009 vaccine years or the greater part of these years. Five to six million vaccines with NO anaphylactic event. Surely a credible, necessary and essential standard of safety. One to hold the vaccine doctors to, for sure. We cannot have vaccines with even very low levels of adverse effects for the consequences to the individuals life is not remote and the very number of vaccines now given would present a nation with one per cent of its people or may be more with permanently ill or disordered children living lives where their health needs and demands on the nation would be exorbitant except by a policy of sidelining them from society possibly by eliciting that they are FAKERS, that the illness is PYSCHSOMATIC and that they need to pull themselves together. In any event in nearly every case the carers pay in EVERY sense. The attitude of KANNER that the parents are to blame has shifted somewhat to the present where the children are now to blame. Anything from: It's a fault in your genes to the simplistic enjoy what God has done to you. In France, old tradition still lives on in 2012. Anaphylaxis was the real event to EVERY animal injected according to certain conditions explored by these early scientists. They could repeat vaccinate without problems as they worked out when and how this anaphylaxis would or would not occur. It took time for this time bomb to arrive. Such techniques are probably those in use today to reduce or eliminate anaphylactic events. We follow a regime where anaphylaxis is at this ZERO level but how many doctors or nurses are aware of the path which is safe and the path to CERTAIN anaphylactic events? Not many. All events are discarded by the doctors, vaccine harm does not exist and when your tiny baby needs an operation to repair anaphylactic harm to one organ or another, your confidence and trust in your doctor reaches new peaks. His kidney operation saved his life. He was born with this fault. Not damage from his vaccines. NO WAY. Government dictates and doctors use rules to determine whether anaphylaxis occurs. Like Canute they decide whether these things are allowed to happen, just as the ancient King would command the sea to halt and go back. Power is ALL powerful. They basically consist of looking at time intervals, organs affected and whether anti-anaphylactic drugs have been given. Also there is the determination that NO CLINICAL TESTS are done to prove or disprove that anaphylaxis has, is or was occurring. The excuse is that it SERVES NO PURPOSE. They in fact succeed where Canute failed. We are in MODERN TIMES. The result of all this skullduggery is that your doctor has the say so whether your child had or did not have an anaphylactic event. The answer is ALWAYS the same. There was NO anaphylactic event. Anaphylaxis like tides are now a thing that used to happen but not in MODERN TIMES. This cynicism continues. Harry was innoculated at 4.30pm. Any slightly delayed anaphylactic events occurring at or during his sleep. Very convenient that dirty deeds are done at night. Death at 10.30pm at night means you get EMERGENCY service treatment or basically NO proper medical treatment. A driver doubles as your or rather the babies life saver. Further the timing of this amateur intervention means such niceties as anaphylactic events are long past their sell by date. We are now clearly entering the time of murder by any or both in the household. In the event only Mrs Sally took the double life for this anaphylactic event. A plethora of tests would indicate even after death that anaphylaxis had occurred but of course NONE was done. The clinical testing cupboard was bare. Proof of murder? EASY; just get a few practised well paid MEDICO-LEGAL EXPERTS to say: Yes! This is how it is done and then turn to the mother and hey presto it works every time. And then there is the POLICE investigation. Everything is investigated, everything except the actions of nurses and doctors in the hours before death. A SIDS investigation is basically: Can we pin this on a carer? The actual murderers or those that gave an anaphylactic injection are actually KEY to the police to bring a prosecution against the mom or dad or both. Would you as a doctor say to the police: Well its like this the vaccine was out of date, it was the last dregs in the bottle coloured red with mercury as we never bother to mix or shake but are LICENSED KILLERS like Bond and the injection was to be frank one BLOODY mess. Or would you say, I think mom did it, she looks like a murderer, she drinks like a fish and I need 50 000 pounds for my yacht I want to buy. I will TESTIFY for you in court. One more vaccine anaphylactic event turned into murder and a million such deaths later we are still CERTAIN: There are NO anaphyklactic events after pediatric vaccines. We have ZERO tests to prove it. And AUTISM, well isn't that more money for our MEDICO-LEGAL experts? We need to justify the non-stop expansion of hospitals, well centres and pharmacies. And we have those experts to assure us with their knighthoods, lifelong professorships and 50 000 pounds a time for their say in court, that all is WELL with WELL clinics and VACCINES but all is not WELL with moms who have just spent months preparing for baby, breaking the bank account and then turning round and murdering the little darling straight after his first lots of health giving vaccines as an underweight, premature baby and a patient coming to the flu coughing nurses who didn't get their jabs but are happy to turn your child into a pin cushion. ANAPHYLAXIS IS NON-EXISTENT IN ANTISEPTIC 2012 BUT ANAPHYLAXIS DID EXIST IN 1903 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.