Minamata and Pink Disease

[Guest guest]

Mercury, Minamata, Pink Disease

But not thimerosal et al causing AUTISM

today.

All have the common denominator

MERCURY.

AUTISM and MERCURY VACCINES

(thimerosal) did have the same common denominator in 1999 with

important original work from the CDC and Tom Verstraeten. Sufficient

in 1999 to order it out of vaccines but in 2012 to allow it still to

be in them. (exceptions of course for scientific and honest nations

in this sense: Russia, Norway, Sweden, Iceland, Denmark etc)

History can be rewritten. Science data

reworked. All it takes is DISHONESTY, CORRUPTION or PROTECTION of an

interest.

We can LEARN from history if the

science is HONEST and SUPPORTED.

After the Minamata epidemic there was

an Institute set up to monitor mercury and its effects on humans.

This proved very useful ten years or so later when another mercury

poisoning incident occurred in Japan.

So after Pink Disease and its

resolution in 1953 or so what did we get:

An Institute to study mercury poisoning

and provide expertise in this area.

Admission that chemicals and drugs for

babies could be lethal and a system set up to recognise such harm.

Removal of mercury from exposure to one

day babies and ensure they get a decent non toxic start to life.

These were just THREE things that were

not LEARNED; not IMPLEMENTED, alongside the ZERO recompense for

victims which is typical for Big p'HARMA who pay out only when told

to by forces bigger than them. (The USA legal process for example but

unlikely to be that of most other nations judiciary. Typical reasons

given: ABUSE OF PROCESS etc.).

The almost certain Pink Disease

causation by MERCURY and specifically CALOMEL, a supposedly

UNREACTIVE and HARMLESS compound of mercury present in teething

powders is not doubted today except by those who seek to OBFUSCATE.

But imagine if this event was unrolling

in a 21st century protective culture and thinking of a

more sophisticated and more powerful Big p'HARMA. Remember back in

1999 - 2003 how they turned an undeniable link of AUTISM to MERCURY

VACCINES to one of an undeniable link to the protection of MERCURY

VACCINES for AUTISM.

Todays legacy is more mercury given to

more children at even earlier ages than ever before in our history.

Epstein in 1953 supported the mercury

theory of Pinks Disease and to him the evidence was overwhelming. But

imagine if he wanted to cast doubt over the REAL cause:

http://archive.samj.org.za/1953%20VOL%20XXVII%20Jul-Dec/Articles/03%20September/3.10%20PINK%20DISEASE%20AND%20TEETHING%20POWDERS.Dr.B.Epstein.pdf

Or GOOGLE chrome search: pink disease

epstein

He had the data in his paper which he

used to prove the link but suppose he quoted the results this way:

Patients with Pinks disease: 45 per

cent had 50 micrograms per litre or LESS

Controls Without Pinks: 53 per cent had

50 micrograms per litre or PLUS

The presence of mercury appears to have

a PROTECTIVE effect for Pink's disease. The reason is not known.

This kind of MISUSE of data by

EPIDEMIOLOGISTS is a possibility by anyone with the intention to

MISLEAD, using actual and CORRECT DATA which in the EPSTEIN paper

clearly shows that mercury far from protecting is the root CAUSE of

Pinks Disease.

IF you have epidemiologists who SELECT

data or REWORK data then this amounts to fraud but there is clear

evidence it happens and authority will back up this data if called to

account to show that that data is fraudulent.

Tom Verstraeten and the CDC actually

found a huge link in 1999 from mercury vaccines and harm for tics and

AUTISM. After a meeting where people called for the data to be

handled (it was) and where the participants were sworn to secrecy, as

the minutes would be published in a fortnight ( It was not. The

reworked data took not two weeks but more than two years and when

published not only was the data completely changed but the lead

researcher had a top job with the vaccine company who were making

mercury vaccines originally linked to autism but now shown to protect

from autism).

The little exercise above for Epstein

research took 2 minutes to change the whole appearance of the role of

mercury in a disease process. Rather less than the years of reworking

and reworking and reworking or data at CDC.

MANY of the epidemiology papers which

show no connection between vaccines and autism are in fact using data

typical of that from EPSTEIN but slanted as above to show DISHONESTLY

the result wanted. In the last resort we will NEVER say vaccines are

harmful.

We are locked in to the 100 plus years

of safe vaccine use.

Pinks disease too was locked in for

over 90 years when no one took notice of the cases in their surgery

EVERY month of the year.

Then for 20 years, recognition of this

fact gradually penetrated the medical practices.

Then followed 30 years before ONE

person suggested MERCURY and then back 60 years ago people LISTENED.

Today the list of eminent scientist who

tell of the HARM of mercury reads like a WHOS WHO.

The list of people who can point to

dangerous vaccine practices is even longer.

But in 2012 nobody is LISTENING. Or

more correctly, they are DEAF to the protests, They SEE no harm or

more correctly they aren't in the final analysis going to SPEAK about

it.

Not thimerosal et al causing AUTISM

today, just

Mercury, Minamata, Pink Disease