Guest guest Posted March 2, 2012 Report Share Posted March 2, 2012 DIY 2 There are other places to go for information on autism, vaccines and neurotoxic metals. What you find here is a whole new world apart from that of modern authoritarian medicine. Doctors who insist that neurotoxic mercury once administered to the one day baby must now be given to the child in the womb as Government in its folly has prohibited mercury vaccines for the new born infant. Doctors who insist you must be protected from illnesses impossible to get before you are 16 years old if you respect the laws of your country. Doctors who insist you get vaccinated many times just in case the vaccine didn't work the first time, second time, third time or fourth time. Doctors who insist that when there are theoretical risks from neurotoxic mercury you just need to up the neurotoxic aluminium and other components of vaccines tenfold to compensate for Government folly once more. Doctors who insist the work of Nobel Prize Winners on medicine is WRONG. Richet was wrong when he found anaphylaxis, allergies and death following repeat vaccines. Doctors who insist that stopping one vaccine preventabe death every few years is necessary even if we don't know why babies die by the million before they are one year old but after receiving the benefits of protection from a dozen out of 3 million illnesses they might encounter. Doctors who don't know why there is a growing epidemic of autoimmune diseases of neurotoxic origin but do know if they are injecting neurotoxins into you they are therefore harmless by some magic application of their oaths. Researchers who insist on multimillion dollar studies and papers to assemble just four letters of the alphabet into strings a hundred or so long that are meaningless even to the researchers themselves assembling this new language no one understands. One day though this information may be more useful than at present. Perhaps for wallpapering some new restaurant perhaps. Doctors who still hold to the philosophy of some Swiss astrologer of 5 hundred years ago and his ideas that poisons can be the doctors and patients BEST FRIEND. That is the world of Pub Med. Try the world of Linus ing a two time Nobel Prize Winner and possibly the only person to achieve this honour. He has very firm ideas on health, which are so DIAMETRICALLY opposed to that of Pub Med and government and authoritarian medicine that you will seek in vain in Pub Med for one whisper of this BLASPHEMY. What is the BLASPEMY? It is that VITAMINS might be VITAL. It is that FOOD should be NOURISHING. A far cry from TODAY, from Government support for tinkered about with food so anything that eats it may bleed to death. A far cry from modern doctors who as said inist if they can't inject neurotoxic mercury they be allowed to inject neurotoxic aluminium into children. A far cry from the same who even relish to inject the TWO neurotoxins together into expectant mum. Linus ing takes us away from a world of today where abortion blamed on vaccines suddenly went from one a year to hundreds a year in USA and many thousands just FORGOTTEN about in line with the ethos of: NO PROOF. NO HARM! KEEP TAKING your NEUROTOXINS. Orthomolecular MEDICINE brings us back to: COMMON SENSE. Vitamins are VITAL. NOURISHING FOOD is NOURISHING. The proof can be seen in Linus ing who died at a good age unlike today millions of children dying before their first BIRTHDAY but after receiving ALL that neurotoxic vaccine protection from 12 of at least 3 million illnesses that lurk behind every pesticide, insecticide, neurotoxin that modern science insist is so BENEFICIAL for us. ORTHOMOLECULAR.ORG See the work of Mike Marlowe from 1995. THE VIOLATION OF CHILDHOOD. http://www.orthomolecular.org/library/jom/1995/pdf/1995-v10n02-p079.pdf No mincing of words here! Straight to the point. And what a point. The lower limit for harm from MERCURY in our vaccines is CLEAR. Crystal CLEAR. The lower limit is ZERO. Not as in current flu vaccines, not as in current vaccines for the one day infant. The amount SAFE is ZERO. http://orthomolecular.org/library/jom/2000/pdf/2000-v15n01-p021.pdf A reference about aluminium and its role in neurodegeneration. Hardly good stuff to give to government by vaccine makers when they recently and after this work decided to up the aluminium for a babies vaccine tenfold. Dr Harold How aluminium causes Alzheimers disease. Again no beating about the bush. If aluminium can according to some authorities cause brain degeneration what 4 Al plus is it doing in a babies vaccine? It is there to save 8 per cent of the antigen of the precious vaccine companies. Babies are exposed to this NEUROTOXIN so that BIG PHARMA can squeeze an extra 8 per cent profit from little children. I find the articles on orthomolecular.org are informative, sensible and generally more understandable than that of pub med. Both should be used, but be prepared for clearness from orthomolecular papers and obfuscation and fog from pub med. Looking at vaccines we see there is need but why not use SCIENCE and NUTRITION to make them safe and why do doctors not advise their patients of such need. http://orthomolecular.org/library/jom/1999/pdf/1999-v14n03-p137.pdf Dr Clemetsen and the protective effects of VITAMINS. Vaccine harm may be tiny, tiny, tiny but bit by bit it builds up until with autism we see people living poorer lives and to blame it on genetics and to thank God for the blessing does not hold water for orthomoelcular medicine that sees GREAT HARM and GREAT OMISSION in authoritarian treatments. It is not accpetable not to know. And not acceptable to demand UNREALISTIC proof that HARMFUL chemicals and HARMFUL practices are HARMFUL. Enough is enough. And why does Pub Med not integrate orthomolecular work? MIGHT is RIGHT But only in the sense that: Two Wrongs do not make a right. Pub Med is not right in hiding the work of sensible, practical researchers and denying them full publicity in finding where, how and when harm comes to modern children. But we can be KNOWLEDGEABLE and use the work of IGNORED, BANNED, DISCREDITED but CORRECT research. DIY 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.