Guest guest Posted February 22, 2010 Report Share Posted February 22, 2010 Obama unveils health plan Proposal lowers Cadillac tax, boosts regulation. President Obama has laid out his plan on health care ahead of Thursday's bipartisan summit. The proposal, posted to the White House _Web site_ (http://www.whitehouse.gov/health-care-meeting/proposal) Monday morning, closely follows the Senate version of the bill (_HR 3590_ (http://www.congress.org/congressorg/bill.xc?billnum=H.R.3590 & congress=111) ) with some changes to appease House Democrats. It is designed to serve as a compromise between the House and Senate versions of the bill. Here are some highlights: Cadillac tax change. Under the Obama plan, the tax on expensive health insurance plans won't kick in until 2018 and would affect fewer people. Payroll tax expansion. To make up for the lost revenue from the Cadillac tax, the President has proposed increasing the payroll tax employers pay for Medicare. Higher cost. The plan would cost $950 billion over 10 years, slightly more than the $900 billion limit President Obama had proposed. White House officials said it would reduce the federal budget deficit by $100 billion over that time. Expanded coverage. The officials added that 31 million more Americans will be insured under the plan, which expands federal subsidies for low-income Americans. State subsidies. The plan offers full federal support for four years to expand Medicaid in all 50 states, not just Nebraska as proposed in the Senate plan. Denials and mandate. Insurance companies would no longer be able to deny coverage based on pre-existing conditions. To balance the cost of this, the President's plan penalizes people without insurance to encourage them to buy a plan. Premium hike controls. Federal regulators would have more power to stop insurance companies from increasing health insurance premiums, traditionally the realm of state governments. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ I'm not too sure about this. There is no public option, so no competition for insurers. The industry still has a monopoly to control what the doctors must do when they treat illness and injury. And now...if one does not buy into the system, they are penalized. Can the government really force a US citizen to buy a product from a private company just because they are a US citizen? I can't think of any other institution that works this way, can you? Sharon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.