Sent this message to the Defense Guys..who surely must be smoking something!!!.

[Guest guest]

Read your 2010 Mold Report

shenning@..., pschoenburg@...

_http://www.wshblaw.com/pictures/2010%20Annual%20Mold%20Litigation%20Update.

pdf_

(http://www.wshblaw.com/pictures/2010%20Annual%20Mold%20Litigation%20Update.pdf)

Dear Mr. Henning and Mr. Schoenburg,

My name is Sharon Kramer. I don't know if you know who I am or not, but I

advocate for change in US health policy over the mold issue so we can get

these illnesses out of the courtroom and into the physicians office where

they belong.

This article was instigated by on my research into the conflicts of

interest of Big Tobacco scientists in the mold issue:

_http://drcraner.com/images/suits_over_mold_WSJ.pdf_

(http://drcraner.com/images/suits_over_mold_WSJ.pdf)

Your 2010 report seems a bit off to me about the current state of health

science over the matter. Instead of denying mold can harm through the

pseudoscience of VeriTox et al, why don't you instruct building owners to

maintain their buildings so that people do not become ill in the first place?

When you promote the false concept that people claiming illness are just

doing so because of trial lawyers, media and Junk Science, then you are

leaving your clients with the impression that the mold in their buildings is

not a serious concern and not a potential liability as a causation of illness

in their occupants and employees.

When you promote this false concept into the psyche of building

stakeholders, not only are you doing harm to the health and safety of the public

by

misinforming those who control the condition of the buildings; you are

leaving the building stakeholders in a position of possibly needing defense

attorneys and expert defense witnesses in the future because they did not

maintain their buildings properly and as a result, people became ill and the

building stakeholder got sued.

Hmmmmmm?

Sincerely,

Sharon Kramer

Sharon Noonan Kramer