Guest guest Posted January 5, 2011 Report Share Posted January 5, 2011 It is not the spore count that is so important. It is the fine particulate load from both bacteria and fungi. [] Re: Mold Testing for Safety [was: Re: air purifier and cleaning house] Carl, I understand what you are saying about air sampling and now I wish I hadn't mentioned it. But here is why I had it done in the home I was in and what I found out for myself personally. I moved snip. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 5, 2011 Report Share Posted January 5, 2011 You practice avoidance....... and a few other things. Only way to go. sorry    God Bless !! dragonflymcs Mayleen ________________________________ From: Jodie <dheelite@...> Sent: Wed, January 5, 2011 5:18:18 PM Subject: Re: [] Mold Testing for Safety [was: Re: air purifier and cleaning house]  .. Until you > are extremely sensitive and perhaps disabled those ambient > spores won't be a problem. And you can't get rid of them anyway. > > Mold *growth* is the problem, not just the ambient spores always > present in the air. Mold growth occurs only at the location of > dampness. Carl, What can you do when you get extremely sensitive and disabled? Jodie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 5, 2011 Report Share Posted January 5, 2011 Anita, Wow! And thank you for the details. You are a case study demonstrating an appropriate use for sampling. It was done by plan, with a specific objective, illustrating several important points. 1. You used a professional with knowledge beyond just how to collect mold samples and get paid. He also took time to closely question you to get specific information to guide his investigation of the house and how to respond to you with clarifying questions. But most importantly he listened to what you said. 2. The levels of detected Stachybotrys correlated with where you did and did not react. 3. When moisture increased your reactions increased, even in places previously non-reactive. If a dehumidifier had been able to keep the humidity lower then perhaps that would have prevented the additional areas of reaction. If it didn't then I would suspect either prior water damage or condensation inside walls and other structures. 4. Cross-contamination discussion. Many on this group have been be-deviled by cross-contamination. Legitimately so. But cross-contamination does not always cause a problem. In fact, detectable levels of airborne Stachybotrys, whether from a growth area or from cross-contamination, did not always cause you to react. You reacted in the bedroom but not in the living room. If the bedroom was the source and there wasn't another source in the living room, then the Stachy in the living room was cross- contamination from the bedroom. And you didn't react. Moral 1 to this story: Presence of detectable mold does not automatically mean someone will get sick. Yes, some do but not everybody all the time. Moral 2: Cross-contamination does not automatically mean someone will get sick. Yes, some do and some need extra- ordinary measures. But not everybody. Moral 3: Sampling can be helpful, sometimes invaluable. But not by itself without the context of the history and the details you provided. Moral 4: Now that you have information you can understand and trust about mold, its affects on you, and mold testing you probably won't need to test again for mold. You will know by your experience. And you continue until your knowledge and experience fails to solve your situation. At which time you need to try something different to find a different cause. Moral 5: Moderate cleaning of contents should be sufficient, which means you don't have to necessarily abandon the house and leave all your posessions behind. Again, some of us do. But it is not automatic. You didn't and you even noticed that you recovered after about 36 hours. You are one of the lucky majority. More importantly, the reasons you gave at the end to support your conclusions and decisions are valid. Good job, Anita! Your story has almost all the elements needed for a successful detective story. And your taking the risk to " mention " your testing experience here was invaluable. Carl Grimes Healthy Habitats LLC ----- Carl, I understand what you are saying about air sampling and now I wish I hadn't mentioned it. But here is why I had it done in the home I was in and what I found out for myself personally. I moved in with a roommate who lives in an old mobile home. This is a rural area and very few have built their own homes. I've come to learn just how problematic mobiles are when it comes to mold. There was no visible mold growing anywhere in her mobile but I could smell it in one of the bathrooms. I really didn't think there was an issue in any of the other rooms but after being there a while I stopped being able to take my protocols which up until now has always meant mold exposure. (I found out later the problem with that wasn't mold related. I hadn't changed to a different antifungal and learned I have to rotate them frequently) Because I was worried about mold I had a mold inspector come and he was surprised when he looked around because there was no visible mold anywhere. He thought I might be quite off in my beliefs about mold and grilled me thoroughly to find out why I was concerned for my health, what my beliefs were about mold, etc. It was very loving of him to take that kind of time out of his day, but as he was not a stranger to me and he took the time. We finally decided to take air samples to see if there was indeed a problem somewhere that couldn't be seen. Maybe at least I could know what areas to avoid. I don't have to smell mold to be affected by it, which is why I unknowingly was exposed to it for so long. The results showed a level of stachybotrys in the room I had been sleeping in of 120/m3. He told me not to go in that room, but the other two rooms were fine. For a week I had been very heavy and weak, had very increased neurological symptoms, anxiety, and could barely get my food prepared. 36 hours after leaving that room my strength returned and I felt much better. I had not smelled mold in that room, only in the adjoining bathroom, and thought maybe the source of the mold was from there every time the door was opened. The mold inspector told us to run the exhaust fan in the bathroom, which we did for hours (mold smell disappeared), and then we did it again later with the door open to draw out the air from the bedroom. He also told us to wipe the walls in the room with water and hepa vacuum. I thought maybe I'd be able to be in there after that but stayed out just the same. In the living room where I was staying the stachybotrys level was 27/m3 and didn't seem to bother me or cause any problems. Then heavy rains came and the house became humid and I could smell mold in the other room I'd been avoiding just on walking in. I eventually had to leave the house altogether because the mold levels rose in the other rooms as well and I reacted too hard to stay. I have since learned that a dehumidifier would have done the trick and brought the mold count back down again. I realize I am reactive to amounts of mold that are too low to bother other people or for them to smell. I don't know if the problem with mold is the mold itself or the VOC's from them. Possibly I am also reacting to bacteria and other toxins from WDB when I am reacting to mold. I know there are tens of thousands of kinds of molds and I seem to have a problem with any kind. I can't eat foods that contain molds like blue cheese, peanuts, or even bread (yeast). So I have quite a way to go to recover and get healthy again. I don't know whether I will have air sampling done again in future. It is very expensive and it may just be better to go by how I feel physically when there is no signs or smell of mold. After all, just because it is good or bad the day of the test doesn't mean it will stay that way. anita Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 7, 2011 Report Share Posted January 7, 2011 Carl, Wow, you really made my day! That was so good to hear, thanks! I was also stoked (ha, now you know how old I am) to find out I'd given accurate info to when she had the mold inspection done with the dog. I wasn't 100% sure. What you mentioned about cross-contamination was interesting. And I never thought of the stachybotrys in the living room as coming from the bedroom. But it would make sense. Also because when I started smelling mold in the living room it smelled different from the stachy in the bedroom. The stachy " smelled black " but the mold in the living room " smelled blue/green/brown. " I once had a problem in my parents house from an antimicrobial that had been applied to a small amount of black mold that couldn't be removed when a windowsill was being replaced. Even though the area was covered with thick plastic so it wouldn't fume out into the room until I could tolerate the new windowsill that was going to be put in, the antimicrobial must have vented out to the outside (there was a small opening to the outside) and come back in through the open window. I couldn't be in that room for over a month afterward. The fumes went up into the duct work in the ceiling and started coming down into the living room where I was sleeping. I started reacting during the night and had to go into the bedroom and seal up the vent and then open all the doors and windows in the living room. Thankfully that worked. So sometimes even though I can't tolerate lots of things, if the concentration is low enough I don't notice it. I also appreciated what you said about using knowledge and experience to solve a situation. I think all of us do that over and over again and we learn more each time. Interesting about the process of elimination. Many times I've thought a reaction was due to a certain thing only to find out it wasn't that, and then guess another thing until finally it gets figured out. It's good when I can keep that process to myself because if I vocalize it I am viewed as an absolute fruit cake! To be part of a lucky majority (that doesn't have to abandon everything due to cross-contamination) is something I would have never thought I was. I have been very disabled and isolated for years and for all that time I thought I was the only one like me, that there weren't other people that were so hypersensitive, so intolerant, so reactive. So when I read of others that are even more sensitive than I am it is very humbling and moving. It is good that we can all continue to help one other with the knowledge and experience we have gained. Thanks again. anita Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 7, 2011 Report Share Posted January 7, 2011 Glad to help a. There are several " categories " of individuals who are on mold support groups. Most are not affected at all unless in large amounts for a long time. Some of those can eventually become suddenly very ill but recover when the exposure stops. But some don't. Those are the ones who are most active on groups like this one because they aren't getting well. Those who get well usually leave. So the group, over time, develops a particular culture of shared experience. If a newcomer joins the perception is that this culture is true - unless they don't get better. Then they either leave quietly or accuse us of something and then leave. One former member who if I mentioned their name would be recognized opened my eyes to this off-group. She had been participating in about 5 other groups and told me each had strong beliefs that only they had the truth. Most, but not all, had something of value but in their case none really fit. If the group culture fits their experience they feel at home so the various groups are all important but each to different people. Carl Grimes Healthy Habitats LLC (fm my Blackberry) [] Mold Testing for Safety [was: Re: air purifier and cleaning house] Carl, thank you so much for taking time to answer in such detail. I work with " molds " a lot in my kitchen (soaking grains, kefiring raw milk etc.), fermenting veggies, drinks, etc. so what you are describing makes a lot of sense in many ways. I am aware that molds are anywhere - it's about the balance. This is a rental home we live in and will be for another year or two. So I guess what I have been doing is probably the correct approach in the current situation. Removed the little mold off of surfaces in the specific corner of the house during winter/rain time and kept those areas very dry ever since (even if it means that our utility bill goes ballistic during this season). We are healthy as far as I can tell. I do make sure that we eat lots of healthy unheated fats (raw butter, coconut oil, olive oil, avocado, eggs) though to neutralize any possible toxicity in the body caused by our surrounding and other factors you simply can't escape today anyway. Some of the posts I read scared me and I started wondering if I could be a bit too naive... All the best, a > > a, > > Good question and I hope my answer doesn't overwhelm or > discourage you. There is a simpler and more accurate method > than sampling which I offer at the end. But first it will help to > understand why sampling won't answer your question about > safety. > > There is no air sampling - do-it-yourself or professional - which by > itself is reliable for much of anything beyond determining that > Yes, this is mold or No, this is not mold. Plus what kind of mold > was collected and identified in the sample with a semi- > quantitative measure of amount (meaning there are numbers but > they are usually not accurate). It will not tell you what mold is > present but which wasn't collected and identified. Which is often > much of the mold. > > ..snip Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 8, 2011 Report Share Posted January 8, 2011 martina, sounds like the NT or weston a price diet, that is basically how we eat for the most part, although i know a lot of people on this list can't tolerate fermented foods... sue v >Carl, > >thank you so much for taking time to answer in such detail. I work with > " molds " a lot in my kitchen (soaking grains, kefiring raw milk etc.), >fermenting veggies, drinks, etc. so what you are describing makes a lot >of sense in many ways. > >I am aware that molds are anywhere - it's about the balance. This is a >rental home we live in and will be for another year or two. So I guess >what I have been doing is probably the correct approach in the current >situation. Removed the little mold off of surfaces in the specific >corner of the house during winter/rain time and kept those areas very >dry ever since (even if it means that our utility bill goes ballistic >during this season). > >We are healthy as far as I can tell. I do make sure that we eat lots of >healthy unheated fats (raw butter, coconut oil, olive oil, avocado, >eggs) though to neutralize any possible toxicity in the body caused by >our surrounding and other factors you simply can't escape today anyway. > >Some of the posts I read scared me and I started wondering if I could be >a bit too naive... > >All the best, >a > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 8, 2011 Report Share Posted January 8, 2011 i'm curious Carl ( or anyone) as to what other groups are out there. I've searched and this is the only one I could find. thank you, jodie ________________________ On 2011-01-08 19:29:57 +1100 Carl Grimes <grimes@...> wrote: > > Glad to help a. There are several " categories " of individuals who are > on mold support groups. Most are not affected at all unless in large amounts > for a long time. Some of those can eventually become suddenly very ill but > recover when the exposure stops. But some don't. Those are the ones who are > most active on groups like this one because they aren't getting well. Those > who get well usually leave. > > So the group, over time, develops a particular culture of shared experience. > If a newcomer joins the perception is that this culture is true - unless they > don't get better. Then they either leave quietly or accuse us of something > and then leave. > > One former member who if I mentioned their name would be recognized opened my > eyes to this off-group. She had been participating in about 5 other groups > and told me each had strong beliefs that only they had the truth. Most, but > not all, had something of value but in their case none really fit. > > If the group culture fits their experience they feel at home so the various > groups are all important but each to different people. > > Carl Grimes > Healthy Habitats LLC > (fm my Blackberry) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 8, 2011 Report Share Posted January 8, 2011 Dr Thrasher I am so new to learning about bacteria and other toxins associated with mold. I never knew about all of that before joining these groups. But I wonder, does it really matter as far as treatment goes? Aren't the things that treat the mold also going to treat the rest? anita Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 8, 2011 Report Share Posted January 8, 2011 The answer to your question is no. Bacterial infections require a different diagnosis and treatment than do fungal infections. Antibiotics do not kill fungi, only bacteria. Antifungals do not kill bacteria, only fungi. You can have a dual infection from exposure to both fungi and bacteria. You can go to my web site and find much information on both fungi and bacteria. If you have any questions either email me directly or post your questions on this forum. Re: [] Re: Mold Testing for Safety [was: Re: air purifier and cleaning house] Dr Thrasher I am so new to learning about bacteria and other toxins associated with mold. I never knew about all of that before joining these groups. But I wonder, does it really matter as far as treatment goes? Aren't the things that treat the mold also going to treat the rest? anita Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 8, 2011 Report Share Posted January 8, 2011 To expand slightly on Dr Thrashers comments about antifungal and antibacterial as his distinctions are absolutely critical to understand in several other contexts. The limitations of each and confusion of the two is similar to the common belief that mold exposure causes all (or most) WDB illnesses and reactions so therefore mold is all we need to talk about and to address. Following on the confusion of the two: Because it is important to kill bacteria shouldn't we need to kill mold also? The key here is " infectious. " We only need to kill bacteria that is infectious. Most of the billion species and varieties are not infectious and many are beneficial. Think " probiotic " and food processing. Likewise, not all molds are infectious and many are beneficial (food processing and composting come to mind). One key difference between bacteria and mold however is the predominant health effect from mold is not infection. Yes, fungal infections are horrible, gruesome, and often fatal. But they are rare and that should not determine our response to all mold anymore than the deadly anthrax bacterium should determine our response to all bacteria. The predominant non-infectious health effects from fungi (mold and yeast) are not stopped by killing. But by removing and keeping dry. Finally, there is a critical difference between the external environment outside our body and the internal environment inside our body. The behavior, effects and treatment of mold in one is not necessarily the same as for the other. Carl Grimes Healthy Habitats LLC (fm my Blackberry) Re: [] Re: Mold Testing for Safety [was: Re: air purifier and cleaning house] The answer to your question is no. Bacterial infections require a different diagnosis and treatment than do fungal infections. Antibiotics do not kill fungi, only bacteria. Antifungals do not kill bacteria, only fungi. You can have a dual infection from exposure to both fungi and bacteria. You can go to my web site and find much information on both fungi and bacteria. If you have any questions either email me directly or post your questions on this forum. Re: [] Re: Mold Testing for Safety [was: Re: air purifier and cleaning house] Dr Thrasher I am so new to learning about bacteria and other toxins associated with mold. I never knew about all of that before joining these groups. But I wonder, does it really matter as far as treatment goes? Aren't the things that treat the mold also going to treat the rest? anita Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 8, 2011 Report Share Posted January 8, 2011 Carl: I disagree to some extent with you. We have isolated and identified Aspergillus species in individuals with sinusitis. Therefore, Aspergillus species can set up an infectious condition. If an individual has sinusitis and/or positive chest x-rays then one must also consider and possibly treat for Aspergillus. Re: [] Re: Mold Testing for Safety [was: Re: air purifier and cleaning house] To expand slightly on Dr Thrashers comments about antifungal and antibacterial as his distinctions are absolutely critical to understand in several other contexts. The limitations of each and confusion of the two is similar to the common belief that mold exposure causes all (or most) WDB illnesses and reactions so therefore mold is all we need to talk about and to address. Following on the confusion of the two: Because it is important to kill bacteria shouldn't we need to kill mold also? The key here is " infectious. " We only need to kill bacteria that is infectious. Most of the billion species and varieties are not infectious and many are beneficial. Think " probiotic " and food processing. Likewise, not all molds are infectious and many are beneficial (food processing and composting come to mind). One key difference between bacteria and mold however is the predominant health effect from mold is not infection. Yes, fungal infections are horrible, gruesome, and often fatal. But they are rare and that should not determine our response to all mold anymore than the deadly anthrax bacterium should determine our response to all bacteria. The predominant non-infectious health effects from fungi (mold and yeast) are not stopped by killing. But by removing and keeping dry. Finally, there is a critical difference between the external environment outside our body and the internal environment inside our body. The behavior, effects and treatment of mold in one is not necessarily the same as for the other. Carl Grimes Healthy Habitats LLC (fm my Blackberry) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 8, 2011 Report Share Posted January 8, 2011 Jack, What you say is true but my point is " can " infect and " will " infect do not have the same prevalence. The number of non-infectious events is still huge compared to infectious ones. Infectious illnesses require the mold to be alive. Non-infectious ones can be caused by dead ones. That distinction is why killing mold only stops the much less common infectious disease and not the frequent allergic, irritation, inflammatory in our paper on CIRS-WDB. Also, I should have been more technical despite that being one of the common complaints about my posts. There are three bodily reference points instead of just the two of inside and outside. The human body is like a donut. Big outside with a hole through the middle. But the human donut hole is the convoluted digestive tract beginning at the mouth and ending at the anus. The donut hole is separated from the donut by the mucous membrane. So is an infection by Candida albicans in the gut inside or outside? And is that infection caused by external exposure sources like from WDB (no) or by inside conditions (antibiotics, etc) which allow the yeast to overgrow? Carl Grimes Healthy Habitats LLC (fm my Blackberry) Re: [] Re: Mold Testing for Safety [was: Re: air purifier and cleaning house] Carl: I disagree to some extent with you. We have isolated and identified Aspergillus species in individuals with sinusitis. Therefore, Aspergillus species can set up an infectious condition. If an individual has sinusitis and/or positive chest x-rays then one must also consider and possibly treat for Aspergillus. Re: [] Re: Mold Testing for Safety [was: Re: air purifier and cleaning house] To expand slightly on Dr Thrashers comments about antifungal and antibacterial as his distinctions are absolutely critical to understand in several other contexts. The limitations of each and confusion of the two is similar to the common belief that mold exposure causes all (or most) WDB illnesses and reactions so therefore mold is all we need to talk about and to address. Following on the confusion of the two: Because it is important to kill bacteria shouldn't we need to kill mold also? The key here is " infectious. " We only need to kill bacteria that is infectious. Most of the billion species and varieties are not infectious and many are beneficial. Think " probiotic " and food processing. Likewise, not all molds are infectious and many are beneficial (food processing and composting come to mind). One key difference between bacteria and mold however is the predominant health effect from mold is not infection. Yes, fungal infections are horrible, gruesome, and often fatal. But they are rare and that should not determine our response to all mold anymore than the deadly anthrax bacterium should determine our response to all bacteria. The predominant non-infectious health effects from fungi (mold and yeast) are not stopped by killing. But by removing and keeping dry. Finally, there is a critical difference between the external environment outside our body and the internal environment inside our body. The behavior, effects and treatment of mold in one is not necessarily the same as for the other. Carl Grimes Healthy Habitats LLC (fm my Blackberry) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 8, 2011 Report Share Posted January 8, 2011 Candia infections are usually consider to arise from being in the digestive tract, however they can become systemic, e.g. infection of intravenous catheters. Usually, the over use of antibiotics allows the Candida to proliferate. However, immune suppression by chemicals can also allow this to occur. Yes, dead spores do not infect. However, live spores do two things: colonize (which may be considered and infection) and actually cause an infection. e.g. aspergillomas of the lungs, brain and other tissues. I have worked with Drs. Gray and Hooper for a number of years. We have actually identified Aspergillus in biopsy and autopsy materials as well as detecting mycotoxins. In the worse case scenario systemic infection with Aspergillus can and does occur. The subjects have been neonates, young adults, adults and the elderly. Aspergillomas of the sinuses can be said to either be a colonization or an infection. The Aspergillus can and does in immune compromised and non compromised individuals enter the brain via the olfactory tract. If the mold invades the tissues of the body, by definition, it is an infection. Re: [] Re: Mold Testing for Safety [was: Re: air purifier and cleaning house] Jack, What you say is true but my point is " can " infect and " will " infect do not have the same prevalence. The number of non-infectious events is still huge compared to infectious ones. ....snip Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 8, 2011 Report Share Posted January 8, 2011 If the spores are still viable, yes. If not viable, no. Same with bacterial spores. [] Mold Testing for Safety [was: Re: air purifier and cleaning house] Carl, can dried mold fragments sometimes become " alive " once inside you? moisture and warmth? > > Jack, > > What you say is true but my point is " can " infect and " will " infect do not have the same prevalence. The number of non-infectious events is still huge compared to infectious ones. > > ...snip Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 9, 2011 Report Share Posted January 9, 2011 I'm talking about bacterial vaginosis--it's not a fungal yeast infection, it's a bacterial infection. But yes, I get the fungal yeast infections, too; actually, I often have the rare treat of getting both at once. Sometimes the fungal is from antibiotics but not always. My doctor finally referred me to a specialist because of this--but I did notice that these increased by at least 50% since I moved into my WDB. You said trichathecenes were found on your ovarian tissues? How did that happen--did your doctor remove tissue and test it? My doctor is more than willing to push CSM on me, but that's been the limit so far of her assistance. I'm trying to figure out what I can get her to do. From: osisposis <jeaninem660@...> Subject: [] Mold Testing for Safety [was: Re: air purifier and cleaning house] Date: Sunday, January 9, 2011, 4:32 PM I costantly fought with viginal yeast infection during both of my WDB exposures, but they were a little different than a yeast infection that a woman might get while takeing antibiotics, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 9, 2011 Report Share Posted January 9, 2011 Not to my knowledge. I doubt that any physician would make a connection. They only think in terms of intercourse as the causation. Re: [] Re: Mold Testing for Safety [was: Re: air purifier and cleaning house] Has bacterial vaginosis ever been correlated with WDB exposure? On Jan 8, 2011, at 10:41 PM, " Jack Thrasher, Ph.D. " <toxicologist1@...> wrote: Candia infections are usually consider to arise from being in the digestive tract, however they can become systemic, e.g. infection of intravenous catheters. Usually, the over use of antibiotics allows the Candida to proliferate. However, immune suppression by chemicals can also allow this to occur. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 9, 2011 Report Share Posted January 9, 2011 I think I see a more enlightened doctor than most. She sees it as an imbalance of bacteria with the ultimate causation being rather complex--antibiotic use is one factor, plus hormonal changes. But looking at the list of bacteria that can cause it, I thought, hmm, some of these could be in WDBs--like Streptococcus pyogenes. I don't think the fluids are normally cultured for specific types of bacteria, since there are only two treatments. But gee--I mean, this seems like as good a route as nose, eyes, and ears, no? From: Jack Thrasher, Ph.D. <toxicologist1@...> Subject: Re: [] Re: Mold Testing for Safety [was: Re: air purifier and cleaning house] Date: Monday, January 10, 2011, 3:32 AM Not to my knowledge. I doubt that any physician would make a connection. They only think in terms of intercourse as the causation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 9, 2011 Report Share Posted January 9, 2011 Good point. It must be the imbalances from all the antibiotics, then--I've been told it can take a long time to recover that balance--since these continued issues have led me to be about as sterile as a human can be (I'll spare everyone the details). I do not wash with bleach, though. Perhaps that is what is finally needed. From: barb b w <barb1283@...> Subject: [] Mold Testing for Safety [was: Re: air purifier and cleaning house] Date: Monday, January 10, 2011, 4:15 AM I think clothing would protect you there. > I think I see a more enlightened doctor than most. She sees it as an imbalance of bacteria with the ultimate causation being rather complex--antibiotic use is one factor, plus hormonal changes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 10, 2011 Report Share Posted January 10, 2011 Dr. Rea told me that your vaginal membranes can become inflammed from toxins and allergins, just like the membranes in your eyes and nose. It does not necessarily have to be from yeast or mold, just another location of inflammation. > > From: Jack Thrasher, Ph.D. <toxicologist1@...> > Subject: Re: [] Re: Mold Testing for Safety [was: Re: air purifier and cleaning house] > > Date: Monday, January 10, 2011, 3:32 AM > > Not to my knowledge. I doubt that any physician would make a connection. They only think in terms of intercourse as the causation. > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.