Guest guest Posted July 15, 2010 Report Share Posted July 15, 2010 " Conversely, the federal government appealed to force tobacco companies to return up to $280 billion in profits from advertising campaigns which were judged to be untruthful about the health risks associated with smoking. " _http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/29/business/29tobacco.html?_r=1 & scp=1 & sq=supreme\ %20court%20tobacco%20 & st=cse_ (http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/29/business/29tobacco.html?_r=1 & scp=1 & sq=supreme\ %20court%20tobacco%20 & st=cse) _Supreme Court Rejects Appeals of Tobacco Ruling-NYTimes.com_ (http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/29/business/29tobacco.html?_r=1 & scp=1 & sq=supreme\ %20court%20tobacco%20 & st=cse) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 15, 2010 Report Share Posted July 15, 2010 Sharon: Have you located the information on the origin of junk science by the Manhattan Institute? [] OT: Supreme Court Reject Big Tobacco RICO Appeal~Fraud In Advertising " Conversely, the federal government appealed to force tobacco companies to return up to $280 billion in profits from advertising campaigns which were judged to be untruthful about the health risks associated with smoking. " _http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/29/business/29tobacco.html?_r=1 & scp=1 & sq=supreme\ %20court%20tobacco%20 & st=cse_ (http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/29/business/29tobacco.html?_r=1 & scp=1 & sq=supreme\ %20court%20tobacco%20 & st=cse) _Supreme Court Rejects Appeals of Tobacco Ruling-NYTimes.com_ (http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/29/business/29tobacco.html?_r=1 & scp=1 & sq=supreme\ %20court%20tobacco%20 & st=cse) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.