Guest guest Posted March 3, 2010 Report Share Posted March 3, 2010 This is great but no one was sick and they got this kind of award?  From: Cheryl Wisecup <wisec4812@...> Subject: [moldtheseverereactor] Jury Awards Family $58 Million in Mold/Homebuilder Lawsuit , moldtheseverereactor , snk1955@..., josephsalowitz@... Date: Tuesday, March 2, 2010, 8:37 PM  Jury awards $58 million to Mansfield couple in home builder lawsuitPosted Tuesday, Mar. 02, 2010 By Baker http://www.star- telegram. com/2010/ 03/02/2009758/ jury-awards- 58-million- to-mansfield. html A Mansfield couple's nearly decadelong legal battle with their home builder, Homes, and a home warranty company took another step toward closure Monday when a Tarrant County jury awarded them $58 million in damages. But on Tuesday, Bob and Jane Cull say, they woke up like it was any other day. Jane Cull went to her job at a hospital company, and Bob Cull, who is retired, said he started tending to some personal business that had been put off for several months as their case came to trial. They also realize that their lawsuit, which has been arbitrated, been appealed and twice gone to the Texas Supreme Court, still has some hurdles to clear before they see any money. " Who knows? " Bob Cull said. " You certainly can't plan on it. We're hopeful. " Holm, a Homes spokesman, in a statement called the verdict " jackpot justice " and an abuse of the legal system. Homes offered to buy the home back at full price, he said. The verdict, Holm said, " is equivalent to every single resident in Texas depositing $2 into the lawyer's bank account. " Homes may appeal the decision, he said. Van Shaw, the couple's attorney, said justice was served. " I thought it was a fair verdict, " he said. Bob Cull describes the couple's legal fight as an " odyssey. " The Culls filed suit in December 2000 in an attempt to get Homes to fix structural and foundation problems that started shortly after they moved into their 2,900-square- foot, four-bedroom house near Walnut Creek Country Club in 1996. The case became politically charged as it moved through the judicial process. Homes is owned by Bob , who has contributed heavily to judicial candidates and political action committees in Texas. Warranty Underwriters Insurance Co. in Houston is also a defendant. " It became more of a mission and less about the home, " Cull said. " We're still in that battle. " Problems, then arbitration The house, which the Culls bought for nearly $234,000, is the only new home they have ever lived in. They bought it for their retirement, moving after 25 years from an 1,800-square- foot home in Arlington where they raised their three children. The couple moved into the house in October 1996, and the problems became apparent by the next January. Cull said Tuesday that at the time, their Homes representative said the house was just settling. " We trusted him, " Cull said. The cracks, though, kept appearing in their walls, and doors and windows jammed shut. They also discovered that a drainpipe that was punctured during construction had soaked a kitchen wall, requiring them to move out for several months while mold was removed. After initially filing their lawsuit in court, the couple in late 2001 asked a judge to instead submit their case to arbitration, which was done. Homes appealed the switch, but lost. In 2002, an arbitrator awarded the couple $800,255. Homes appealed the award to the Texas Supreme Court. In 2008, the court vacated that award in a 5-4 decision, citing legal issues with the way the case was switched from the courts to arbitration, and sent it back to the trial court. That trial began Feb. 3 in state district court in Tarrant County. Several dozen witnesses testified, and the jury deliberated Friday and Monday before reaching its verdict. The judge still needs to approve the jury verdict. The Culls were awarded $7.1 million in actual damages and $40 million in punitive damages against Homes. The jury also awarded $7.1 million in actual damages and $4 million in punitive damages against Warranty Underwriters. Consumer groups applaud The jury's decision was praised by Texas consumer groups. " thought he could simply wear out the Culls by dragging them through appeal after appeal, " wrote Winslow, executive director of Texas Watch. " He underestimated the resolve of individuals who know their cause is right and just, " Winslow said. " The jury's decision sends a clear message that the influence of [political action committee] contributions and high-dollar lobbyists have not yet crept into the jury box. " Janet Ahmad, president of HomeOwners for Better Building, based in San , said the Culls have been vindicated. " Until Texas lawmakers pass legislation to regulate and license the building industry, powerful tycoons like Bob have no incentive to build homes right the first time or treat their customer with respect or stand behind the homes they build, " she said in a prepared statement. Repairs still needed The Culls have never moved from the house, even though the structural problems have never been addressed and the foundation still moves, Bob Cull said. He said he and his wife have the resources only to patch and paint over the cracks. But he said they don't want others to go through what they have, and they have no plans to back down now. " We're not going away, " he said. " You just have to have that gritty resolve. " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 3, 2010 Report Share Posted March 3, 2010 Looks like they had a good attorney. > > This is great but no one was sick and they got this kind of award?  > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.