Re: 2005 Acute effects of a fungal volatile compound. plus th...

[Guest guest]

Yep. That is not a peer reviewed, published writing. And in 2011, he is

STILL making a ton of money off of denial of illness. Only now, none of it

has to be shared with the Regents of the UC...which means under California

law, Saxon should no longer be using that UC letter head on the taxpayer

bought stationary to add credibility to his work, intrastate or interstate.

Also, when asked under oath in 2006, he said the only two papers he has

authored on mold are the AAAAI mold statement and the ACOEM mold statement.

Yet, he is listed as authoring the US Chamber's mold statement. He says

under oath that he didn't know his name was on it and that he had not even

read it three years after its publication.

BUT, his ACOEM mold statement co-author, Kelman, says they got Saxon's

permission to list him as an author for the US Chamber paper. Which means,

one of the three authors of the ACOEM mold statement (that the revisions rely

upon heavily), is not tell the truth about who authored the US Chamber's

mold statement. AND this paper is being used in litigation in purported

scientific validation Kelman's expert opinion...in a litigation involving

infant death.

In this pdf are:

1 .the billing records for the Chamber paper of only Hardin and Kelman

billing time

2. Saxon stating under oath he didn't author it, and didn't know his name

was on it.

3. Kelman saying they got Saxon's permission to list him as an author

_http://freepdfhosting.com/1e539c7db7.pdf_

(http://freepdfhosting.com/1e539c7db7.pdf)

In a message dated 3/13/2011 3:24:16 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,

jeaninem660@... writes:

now theres alot of info. out there conserning VOC's and damage they can

cause by inhalation.