Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Az Appellate Court Defines OUTRAGEOUS! BEHAVIOR, Then Proceeds To Practice It!

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

_ARIZONA APPELLATE COURT DEFINES “OUTRAGEOUS! BEHAVIOR†AND THEN PROCEEDS

TO PRACTICE IT, JUST LIKE THE SAN DIEGO COURTS HAVE ._

(http://katysexposure.wordpress.com/2010/08/03/arizona-appellate-court-defines-o\

utrageous-behavior-and-then-proceeds-to-practice-it-just-like-the-san-diego-cour\

ts-have-for-five-years-over-the-same-issues-fraud-in-health-marketing-by-the-us/\

)

The Appellate Court ruled in the Az Case involving infant deaths and a

moldy apartment on July 27th. Within the ruling they spelled out what

constitutes “Outrageous!†behavior (pg 33) while Outrageously! stating none

of

this type of behavior has occurred by the defense side in this case.

According to the AZ Appellate Panel of three judges , “An action is ‘

extreme and outrageous’ if it ‘falls at the very extreme edge of the

spectrum

of possible conduct’ and goes ‘beyond all possible bounds of decency, [so

as] to be regarded as atrocious[] and utterly intolerable in a civilized

community.’ Watts v. Golden Age Nursing Home, 127 Ariz. 255, 257, 619 P.2d

1032, 1035 (1980) (citations omitted); see also Restatement (Second) of Torts

§ 46(1) cmt. d (1965)’

The Az Appellate Panel then proceeded to exhibit Outrageous! behavior by

apparently pretending the irrefutable evidence of the fraud within the

National Apartment Association political action committee (“NAA Pacâ€)

Amicus

submitted in the case does not exist. The submitted NAA Pac Amicus cited to

the US Chamber’s “Scientific View†of environmental science as paid for

to be penned by two of the defense experts in the same case the Az Appellate

Panel is overseeing, _Kelman _ (http://freepdfhosting.com/1567c569fb.pdf)

and (purportedly) _Robbins_ (http://freepdfhosting.com/64ff4f99a9.pdf) of

VeriTox, Inc.

When helping their NAA members, such as Wasatch Property Management in

this case, avoid liability for tenant injury and even death, the NAA told

this Az Appellate court via via their amicus that, “a panel of

scientists..stated that years of intense study have failed to produce any

causal

connection between exposure to indoor mold and adverse health effectsâ€. They

do

this, with the assistance of the US Chamber of Commerce and the University of

California names on their legal documents used to lend credibility to the

false words.

Yet, while misleading the courts that mold does not harm their tenants,

the NAA blogs to its members of the true science, “..mold can cause major

health problems and even death.†...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...