Guest guest Posted March 3, 2010 Report Share Posted March 3, 2010 I bet the inmates and guards would disagree with the title of this " investigative " report. _http://www.therandolphleader.com/articles/2010/03/03/news/396-jail%20mold.t xt_ (http://www.therandolphleader.com/articles/2010/03/03/news/396-jail%20mold.txt) Jail mold determined to not be a hazard by _ Sorrell Burnside_ (mailto:vanessa@...) Wednesday, March 3, 2010 8:49 AM CST WEDOWEE--In a press conference on Friday morning of last week, Randolph County Commission addressed the results of mold tested from Randolph County Jail. Commissioner Doyle said the press conference was held at the recommendation of the county's liability insurance carrier and limited questions to members of the press. He said samples were taken by DMR Technical Services of Birmingham at the jail on Feb. 19 and results received on Feb. 22. Air samples were taken throughout the building, and surface samples were taken in a women's cell, ceiling of the nurse's office and ceiling of the kitchen. The report calls the airborne mold samples " relatively normal " and states the molds were of common varieties. It explains that a powdery substance on the ceilings is efflorescence, a leaching of salts from the concrete and surfaces likely caused by the migration of water through the minerals. According to the report, " There are currently no federal or state regulations regarding the presence of mold and its effects on human health, nor are there any established guidelines for use in determining acceptable levels of mold in indoor environments. DMR accepts that some individuals may be more susceptible than others to health concerns associated with mold exposure. The information and recommendation herein apply to the average individual. " The report attributes the mold to leaks from the plumbing, the shower stalls, rainwater seeping through exterior walls from inadequate drainage or gutters and from issues with the heating and air (HVAC) system. said the mold can be cleaned with common cleaning agents; however, when Volkert & Associates begins evaluating the jail prior to proposed renovations, they should address the sources of this mold and ways to stop its growth, via working on drainage, plumbing, HVAC, etc. Jail administrator Craig son noted that the mold had been cleaned before and came back. Commissioner Lathonia noted that voters had twice voted down referendums for new taxes to build a new jail, so the funds to work on the jail will come from existing sources, court fines and capital improvement funds. explained that the findings of Volkert may change the direction of the plans for the jail project. He said, " If they say it's beyond repair, we told them to go back to square one. They indicated we'd need to build on site because of buying land and site preparation costs. The project budget is $2.5 million and the fee to Volkert is 8.5 percent or $212,000. During its last meeting, the commission voted 3-2 to hire the consulting firm of Volkert & Associates to act as a general contractor on the jail project. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.