Guest guest Posted May 30, 2010 Report Share Posted May 30, 2010 Hey Barb, Everything you said is right on the mark. Someone sent me this video which was done around the Galveston area but I am not sure when? I am going to send it to someone I know there and see if they have heard of it but I thought I would post here also. Since they are talking about microbes I wonder if anyone here on the board might know something about whether or not this would be a realistic solution. I am just curious. Beyond that I completely agree that no matter what BP will do exactly as you are saying. It reminds me of a situation years ago, I think in France, where one of our nuclear bombs was in a plane that crashed or something but we ended up taking mountains of dirt from there and stored it here somewhere. I have often thought of the Kaiser Papers (I think it was Downy studios or something) that has been talked about here so often.. Many people died from that. There is no telling where all that dirt is? Anyway tell me what you think and maybe some of the professionals here might chime in as well. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8VfypUzx1tI & feature=email Chris... ________________________________ From: barb b w <barb1283@...> Sent: Sun, May 30, 2010 11:34:08 AM Subject: [] OT: Gulf Spill: Citizen offered reasonable solution near beginning of leak well  Private citizens seems to have reasonable solution to cleaning up the spill offered to BP, days after spill started, on a form BP gave him for such purpose, and BP responded but were not interested. To me this shows, per usual, corporation is only interested in stopping the financial loss of oil, but once oil is out in the water, they don't care about it (since THEY can't use it anymore), and probably don't plan to pay for clean up either. See how peat moss naturally sops up oil * http://cnn.com/video/?/video/us/2010/05/30/nr.holmes.corpora.cnn Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 30, 2010 Report Share Posted May 30, 2010 This would probably be a better approach than the dispersants now employed. However, the dispersants may now be antagonistic to the action of these bacteria. Jack-Dwayne: Thrasher, Ph.D. Toxicologist/Immunotoxicologist/Fetaltoxicologist www.drthrasher.org toxicologist1@... Off: 916-745-4703 Cell: 575-937-1150 L. Crawley, M.ED., LADC Trauma Specialist sandracrawley@... 916-745-4703 - Off 775-309-3994 - Cell This message and any attachments forwarded with it is to be considered privileged and confidential. The forwarding or redistribution of this message (and any attachments) without my prior written consent is strictly prohibited and may violate privacy laws. Once the intended purpose of this message has been served, please destroy the original message contents. If you have received this message in error, please reply immediately to advise the sender of the miscommunication and then delete the message and any copies you have printed. Thank you in advance for your compliance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 31, 2010 Report Share Posted May 31, 2010 Thank you Dr. Thrasher. I had not thought of that at all. It is typical but very sad that of all the time they have taken to " think things through " no one could come up with a better idea than these nasty harmfull chemicals. Now they are saying with the next option, the funnel thingy, it will be August before they get to it. I am just stunned. Once again, thank you. Chris...         Freedom is the emancipation from the arbitrary rule of other men :Mortimer Adler ________________________________ From: " Jack Thrasher, Ph.D. " <toxicologist1@...> Sent: Mon, May 31, 2010 12:29:20 AM Subject: [] Re: OT: Gulf Spill: Citizen offered reasonable (Dr. Thrasher also)  This would probably be a better approach than the dispersants now employed. However, the dispersants may now be antagonistic to the action of these bacteria. Jack-Dwayne: Thrasher, Ph.D. Toxicologist/Immunotoxicologist/Fetaltoxicologist www.drthrasher.org toxicologist1@... Off: 916-745-4703 Cell: 575-937-1150 L. Crawley, M.ED., LADC Trauma Specialist sandracrawley@... 916-745-4703 - Off 775-309-3994 - Cell This message and any attachments forwarded with it is to be considered privileged and confidential. The forwarding or redistribution of this message (and any attachments) without my prior written consent is strictly prohibited and may violate privacy laws. Once the intended purpose of this message has been served, please destroy the original message contents. If you have received this message in error, please reply immediately to advise the sender of the miscommunication and then delete the message and any copies you have printed. Thank you in advance for your compliance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 31, 2010 Report Share Posted May 31, 2010 check out naturalnews.com today, he has a theory that BP may not even really be trying to stop the flow of oil from this well, that it may be in BP's best interests financially to let it keep flowing, just a theory....but an interesting one. sue v >Thank you Dr. Thrasher. I had not thought of that at all. It is typical >but very sad that of all the time they have taken to " think things >through " no one could come up with a better idea than these nasty >harmfull chemicals. Now they are saying with the next option, the funnel >thingy, it will be August before they get to it. I am just stunned. Once >again, thank you. > >Chris... > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.