Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Re: OT: Gulf Spill: Citizen offered reasonable (Dr. Thrasher also)

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Hey Barb, Everything you said is right on the mark. Someone sent me this video

which was done around the Galveston area but I am not sure when? I am going to

send it to someone I know there and see if they have heard of it but I thought I

would post here also. Since they are talking about microbes I wonder if anyone

here on the board might know something about whether or not this would be a

realistic solution. I am just curious. Beyond that I completely agree that no

matter what BP will do exactly as you are saying. It reminds me of a situation

years ago, I think in France, where one of our nuclear bombs was in a plane that

crashed or something but we ended up taking mountains of dirt from there and

stored it here somewhere. I have often thought of the Kaiser Papers (I think it

was Downy studios or something) that has been talked about here so often.. Many

people died from that. There is no telling where all that dirt is? Anyway tell

me what you think

and maybe some of the professionals here might chime in as well.

  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8VfypUzx1tI & feature=email

Chris...

________________________________

From: barb b w <barb1283@...>

Sent: Sun, May 30, 2010 11:34:08 AM

Subject: [] OT: Gulf Spill: Citizen offered reasonable solution

near beginning of leak well

 

Private citizens seems to have reasonable solution to cleaning up the spill

offered to BP, days after spill started, on a form BP gave him for such purpose,

and BP responded but were not interested. To me this shows, per usual,

corporation is only interested in stopping the financial loss of oil, but once

oil is out in the water, they don't care about it (since THEY can't use it

anymore), and probably don't plan to pay for clean up either.

See how peat moss naturally sops up oil *

http://cnn.com/video/?/video/us/2010/05/30/nr.holmes.corpora.cnn

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

This would probably be a better approach than the dispersants now employed.

However, the dispersants may now be antagonistic to the action of these

bacteria.

Jack-Dwayne: Thrasher, Ph.D.

Toxicologist/Immunotoxicologist/Fetaltoxicologist

www.drthrasher.org

toxicologist1@...

Off: 916-745-4703

Cell: 575-937-1150

L. Crawley, M.ED., LADC

Trauma Specialist

sandracrawley@...

916-745-4703 - Off

775-309-3994 - Cell

This message and any attachments forwarded with it is to be considered

privileged and confidential. The forwarding or redistribution of this message

(and any attachments) without my prior written consent is strictly prohibited

and may violate privacy laws. Once the intended purpose of this message has been

served, please destroy the original message contents. If you have received this

message in error, please reply immediately to advise the sender of the

miscommunication and then delete the message and any copies you have printed.

Thank you in advance for your compliance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Thank you Dr. Thrasher. I had not thought of that at all. It is typical but

very sad that of all the time they have taken to " think things through " no one

could come up with a better idea than these nasty harmfull chemicals. Now they

are saying with the next option, the funnel thingy, it will be August before

they get to it. I am just stunned. Once again, thank you.

Chris...

 

    

   

 Freedom is the emancipation from the arbitrary rule of other men :Mortimer

Adler

________________________________

From: " Jack Thrasher, Ph.D. " <toxicologist1@...>

Sent: Mon, May 31, 2010 12:29:20 AM

Subject: [] Re: OT: Gulf Spill: Citizen offered reasonable (Dr.

Thrasher also)

 

This would probably be a better approach than the dispersants now employed.

However, the dispersants may now be antagonistic to the action of these

bacteria.

Jack-Dwayne: Thrasher, Ph.D.

Toxicologist/Immunotoxicologist/Fetaltoxicologist

www.drthrasher.org

toxicologist1@...

Off: 916-745-4703

Cell: 575-937-1150

L. Crawley, M.ED., LADC

Trauma Specialist

sandracrawley@...

916-745-4703 - Off

775-309-3994 - Cell

This message and any attachments forwarded with it is to be considered

privileged and confidential. The forwarding or redistribution of this message

(and any attachments) without my prior written consent is strictly prohibited

and may violate privacy laws. Once the intended purpose of this message has been

served, please destroy the original message contents. If you have received this

message in error, please reply immediately to advise the sender of the

miscommunication and then delete the message and any copies you have printed.

Thank you in advance for your compliance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

check out naturalnews.com today, he has a theory that BP may not even

really be trying to stop the flow of oil from this well, that it may be

in BP's best interests financially to let it keep flowing, just a

theory....but an interesting one.

sue v

>Thank you Dr. Thrasher. I had not thought of that at all. It is typical

>but very sad that of all the time they have taken to " think things

>through " no one could come up with a better idea than these nasty

>harmfull chemicals. Now they are saying with the next option, the funnel

>thingy, it will be August before they get to it. I am just stunned. Once

>again, thank you.

>

>Chris...

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...