Going on Leave - Re: Letter/Political Action Group

[Guest guest]

are you saying they are both gone for good?

>

>

>

>

> Dear Jack,

>

> Really sorry to see resign from the group. I wish you all the best as you

> move forward with your life and put this long experience behind you. You

> have been an important part of the process on this board, and you will be

> missed.

>

> I hate to bring this up when we are trying to put this matter to bed but

> feel I must. There is an error in your parting statement to Sickbuildings

> that needs to be set straight. Remember receiving this email from me just

> four days ago in response to one you sent to me?

>

>

>

> In a message dated 8/16/2010 9:56:27 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,

> SNK1955@... writes:

>

> Why are you emailing me? You said you blocked me since I refused to

> accept the lack of transparent answers within ACHEMMIC that stimie the type of

> work Dina just helped with greatly to expose the deceit in the politics.

>

> You tell me you have blocked my emails - just as you have assisted to

> block my message.

>

> Please do not email me anymore when you tell me my words to you are

> blocked.

>

>

>

> Sharon

>

>

> In a message dated 8/19/2010 9:48:39 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,

> toxicologist1@... writes:

>

> Sharon, I am leaving the group as I have said. As long as the ACHEMMIC

> issue is brought up on this forum and addressing me about the issue, I will

> stay out of forum. I told you some time ago that I was tired of receiving

> your emails on this issue. I even asked you not to email, but have continue

to

> do so. I did not block you, I wanted to know if you would honor my

> request. You did nt.

>

> Jack-Dwayne: Thrasher, Ph.D.

> Toxicologist/Immunotoxicologist/Fetaltoxicologist

> www.drthrasher.org

>

>

>

>

>

> In a message dated 8/19/2010 7:02:38 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,

> SNK1955@... writes:

>

> Jack,

>

> Don't leave. This is a tough issue. Sometimes situations call for tough

> stances when there are so many lives on the line and so much work to do.

> As I understand it, we are hopefully soon to come to a resolution over a

> matter that occurred about seven weeks ago that has had a rippling and

> dividing effect in the mold community.

>

> I know that you understood my concerns and even voiced a need to correct.

> But it wasn't done. The problem was left to fester and grow while a lot

> was going on with ACHEMMIC trying to get the POA paper out.

>

> The paper is out. It is a great addition to help the sick and injured.

> Now, its time to correct the error, so we can all move on and support each

> others' efforts as we work to solve this multifaceted problem from all

angles.

>

> You, me, Carl, KC, Melinda, Ritchie and many others have been comrades in

> this fight for a looooong time. I think we have found a viable solution to

> the problem. As such, there is certainly no reason to part ways forever if

> a solution can be reached. Just hang in for a couple days. Hopefully

> this matter will be over and put to bed.

>

> WR,

> Sharon

>

>

> In a message dated 8/19/2010 6:36:35 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,

> toxicologist1@... writes:

>

> : Everyone: I am also leaving the SickBuilding forum for the same reason

> as Carl. I was a member of the original Executive Committee of ACHEMMIC and

> voted with many other members of the committee to support the letters to

> UC. I also voted and still vote to support Sharon. However, the Executive

> Committee no longer exits since the incorporation of ACHEMMIC. I have

> attempted in the past to intercede in this matter. I was not successful.

Sharon

> can continue to make request of ACHEMMIC. I am not in a position any longer

> to breach this subject with ACHEMMIC. It will have to wait for the Board of

> Directors, whom ever they may be. I am not one of them.

>

> KC, I trust you will honor my right to speak out and post this.

>

> Jack-Dwayne: Thrasher, Ph.D.

>

>

>

>

>

>

>