Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Toxins

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

On Fri, 11 Feb 2000 21:10:37 EST Foggschool@... writes:

> From: Foggschool@...

>

> <A HREF= " http://www.cco.net/~trufax/menu/chem.html " >The Chemical

> Manipulation of Human Consciousness</A>

>

> http://www.cco.net/~trufax/menu/chem.html

>

> To all interested in the truth about toxins in our world and the

> effects it

> has on our health, this is a great link.

>

> (Biological Manipulation of Human Populations

>

A very interesting site. There probably is a lot of good stuff in it.

However, I wish the author of the introductory piece had taken a little

time to do some relaxation exercises before beginning to write. The venom

that came spewing from his pen made the content almost obscene. Why is it

that crusaders for truth think that they have to pulverize the opposition

with vitriol in order to make their point? After reading a few rather

tedious paragraphs of demagoguery, I decided that it wasn't worth soiling

my soul with the author's hatred in order to add a small amount of

information to my mind. It's a shame that it came out that way. I'm sure

he meant well in his efforts to warn us all.

________________________________________________________________

YOU'RE PAYING TOO MUCH FOR THE INTERNET!

Juno now offers FREE Internet Access!

Try it today - there's no risk! For your FREE software, visit:

http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The intentions of sending the site was this: to offer an opportunity for

those interested to expand their own knowledge. I would hope that one would

use his or her good judgment to decide what information to use and what

information to disregard.

" Why is it

that crusaders for truth think that they have to pulverize the opposition

with vitriol in order to make their point? "

I would like to say this: It is the opposition who sent Hulda to jail. It is

the opposition who would not listen to the countless parents and teachers

reporting that the Columbine boys were in trouble and that something needed

to be done. It is the opposition that is trying to sell my children food

products known to be toxic. It is the opposition who will knowingly market

birth control that has been proven lethal in third world and American test

subjects. It is the opposition who will aggressively market vaccinations made

from aborted fetuses and other unspeakable elements that have been proven

toxic. It is the opposition that has taken religion and prayer out of our

schools. It is the opposition that choses to give deadly chemotherapy to

cancer victims, knowing it will only kill them faster. It is the opposition

that will continue to market known hazardous products, in order to make a

buck. It is the opposition who is okaying the destruction of our planet. And,

it is the opposition who takes the authoritarian role, telling our country

what information they are entitled to.

When confronted, it does not surprise me that the opposition is sometimes met

with pulverization and vitriol. However, I myself do not like " spewing

venom, " I choose, instead, to IGNORE the opposition and try not to take

others remarks so personally, all the while leaving the door open for

information and knowledge offered me. The world is a great place to learn and

I feel very fortunate to be a member of this letter group. I expect oppsition

here, as with any other place, but expect also to learn and be given the

opportunity to do so.Foggs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In a message dated 2/12/2000 1:42:27 PM Eastern Standard Time,

rossviva@... writes:

<< Why do conventional physicians do this to their own children when they

have cancer? >>

It is my understanding that a physician choosing chemotherapy for his/her own

child is unaware of an alternative medicine, either by chance or by choice. <A

HREF= " http://home.sol.no/~dusan/chemo_therapy_facts.html " >Chemo therapy</A>

http://home.sol.no/~dusan/chemo_therapy_facts.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does anyone here personally know any cancer or AIDS victims believed to be cured

by Dr. 's methods?

I have tried to verify some of the cases in her 2 books on cancer, and it is

very hard to do.

Thank you,

Bill Ross

Foggschool@... wrote:

> <snip> It is the opposition that choses to give deadly chemotherapy to

> cancer victims, knowing it will only kill them faster. <snip>

Why do conventional physicians do this to their own children when they have

cancer? We had a D.O. in our

town who lost a daughter to a form of Leukemia last year. It's hard to imagine

that he did not look far

and wide for something that would offer better odds than chemo.

Thanks again,

Bill Ross

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi ,

I agree. I've been having discussions for several days about Tim Bolen's

opinion piece that you posted here. My friends generally think it is too

negative and confrontational, and I disagree.

I think the ecological crisis on our planet is such that measures must be

taken. Those who have chosen to worship money instead of God (truth) have us

in a deathgrip and we're not going to get them to ease up by being

oh-so-nice and oh-so-cooperative.

I salute those who are resisting the death by pollution that the cartel is

forcing upon us. I salute those who are being persecuted (like Dr. )

for telling the truth instead of meekly acquiescing to the AMA/FDA line.

It may be too late to change the course of the planet, but it is certain

that if we don't take a stand now...in a few decades we will all be too sick

to stand at all.

We would rather have the soothing glib anchormanlike gentleman's dialogue

where everyone is so polite and erudite, but sometimes the shrill, the

awkward, even hysterical voices must be heard. Just like sometimes you have

to take the epsom salts and cayenne instead of the sugar coated refined

carbohydrates. We have to listen sometimes to what we don't want to hear.

Regards

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I couldn't agree with you more.

One must not battle everything, but choose the battles wisely, and this is a

battle that needs a drawn sword. It is getting to the point were good

intentions are not enough, action is.

Eileen

Re: Toxins

>From: " Counts " <jcounts@...>

>

>Hi ,

>

>I agree. I've been having discussions for several days about Tim Bolen's

>opinion piece that you posted here. My friends generally think it is too

>negative and confrontational, and I disagree.

>

>I think the ecological crisis on our planet is such that measures must be

>taken. Those who have chosen to worship money instead of God (truth) have

us

>in a deathgrip and we're not going to get them to ease up by being

>oh-so-nice and oh-so-cooperative.

>

> I salute those who are resisting the death by pollution that the cartel is

>forcing upon us. I salute those who are being persecuted (like Dr. )

>for telling the truth instead of meekly acquiescing to the AMA/FDA line.

>

>It may be too late to change the course of the planet, but it is certain

>that if we don't take a stand now...in a few decades we will all be too

sick

>to stand at all.

>

>We would rather have the soothing glib anchormanlike gentleman's dialogue

>where everyone is so polite and erudite, but sometimes the shrill, the

>awkward, even hysterical voices must be heard. Just like sometimes you have

>to take the epsom salts and cayenne instead of the sugar coated refined

>carbohydrates. We have to listen sometimes to what we don't want to hear.

>

>Regards

>

>

>

>---------------------------

Link to comment
Share on other sites

><< Why do conventional physicians do this to their own children when they

>have cancer? >>

I know many allopathic (conventional) doctors, and quite honestly, it is

sometimes more ignorance than fear.

Many doctors are just as ignorant of the new ways of healing, and

alternatives, as many lay people are.

Be well,

Eileen

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> From: Foggschool@...

>

> It is my understanding that a physician choosing chemotherapy for his/her own

> child is unaware of an alternative medicine, either by chance or by choice. <A

> HREF= " http://home.sol.no/~dusan/chemo_therapy_facts.html " >Chemo therapy</A>

> http://home.sol.no/~dusan/chemo_therapy_facts.html

Foggschool:

I read through some of the links you posted. A lot of good info there, but I

don't know if it supports

your earlier statement of " It is the opposition that choses to give deadly

chemotherapy to cancer

victims, knowing it will only kill them faster. "

I grant you, chemotherapy is controversial, even among many M.D.s., and perhaps

in many, even the majority

of cases, it is not worth the cost -- I personally just don't know. But there

are also many cancer

patients out there today who would credit chemo with saving their lives. Even

Ralph Moss, who is quoted

often by those who condemn chemotherapy, in his book, " Questioning Chemotherapy "

page 152 states " There

are in fact several reasonable goals that palliative chemotherapy might

accomplish. " And on page 8 in

that book he states " Namely there are situations where chemotherapy can be a

rational and life-saving

course. These include most cases of Hodgkin's disease, acute lymphocytic

leukemia, and testicular cancer,

as well as certain rare cancers, such as Burkitt's lymphoma, rhabdomyosarcomas,

and retinoblastoma. It

also plays a part, with surgery, in the successful treatment of Wilm's tumor,

Ewing's sarcoma,

rhabdomyosarcoma, and retinoblastoma. Among the more common adenocarcinomas,

chemotherapy appears to

extend survival in many cases of ovarian cancer. In small-cell lung cancer

there seems to be a survival

gain of several months. Its possible value as an adjuvant treatment in breast

cancer patients after

potentially curative surgery is discussed at length below. Basically, some

chemotherapy has its uses;

this message will be repeated throughout the text. However, even for the above

cancers, chemotherapy

remains an often grueling option -- medieval, by many doctors' own admission.

Even for these kinds of

cancer, effective, less-toxic substitutes are therefore desperately needed. "

Do you discount the above opinions of Moss, when you say, " It is the opposition

that choses to give deadly

chemotherapy to cancer victims, knowing it will only kill them faster. " ? I

don't know exactly who the

" opposition " is, but according to Moss, they are probably saving or extending a

lot of lives.

Bill Ross

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I disagree with Moss if Moss is selling chemotherapy, yes. " Our " bodies have

broken down due to the chemical invasion on our organs, resulting in the

conditions in question. I must certainly question how a deadly chemical

added to an already diseased body could possibly eliminate disease.

The medical community will tell you that there are statistics that prove

chemo works...in some cases... What they will not tell you, is that the

percentage of remissioned cancer also includes those who chose alternative

medicine. In other words, they are using the entire group of individuals who

went into remission, to calculate their " success " .

Thanks for setting me straight on the Bill thing. He was starting to sound

like the opposition. Tee Hee.

Bill, Steve, I don't think that Hulda's letter group is a good place to

practice your medical jargon and rude etiquette. That is just my opinion. I

am here to learn more about Hulda. There is absolutely, in no way, anything

you can tell me that will make me change the way I feel about her. She DID

save my life, but I am not interested in discussing the details with you, as

you have shown me that you are blind to even the brightest signs of life. You

can hunt me down and put me on the list, but then you will still have my

children to deal with and their children......Long live Hulda. Foggs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am hearing you say (and I have read elsewhere) that chemotherapy

extends lives. All well and good if the patient's goal is to survive at

any cost. Personally, I'm not sure that I would want to endure the agony

which comes from chemo, just to extend my time on this earth by a few

months, especially if there were some treatment which would bring about a

CURE. I don't think I would call a six-month reprieve a " cure " , anymore

than I would say that I had " cured " a diseased appendix by cutting it

out.

Gordon

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 years later...
Guest guest

Hi Carol -it is freaky, and disturbing. Again -our member numbers

are higher in the more industrial states -and again -NJ is higher

than NYC where awareness is the same. Apraxia used to be thought of

as rare.... and in some states it still is, mainly nonindustrial

ones. Here is what parents in the past faced -and why we will have

to work harder to show that not just numbers for apraxia/autism/PDD -

but numbers for learning disabled, speech language impaired and MR

have gone up in the same states -and numbers overall stayed the same

in others over 10 years. We are no longer just talking about just

Tom's River -we are talking about everybody's river.

http://mdnetguide.net/oncology/v3n2/onc_april/CoverStory_onc.shtml

There has again been a four fold rise in autism and a 30 fold rise

in speech and language disorders in the past ten years according to

the stats from the US Department of Education. And although Dr.

Marilyn Agin was misquoted in this recent WebMD article (the 30 fold

rise is not due solely to ear infections!!!) So Cara -even though

hearing impairments -even temporary ones -are a big issue in regards

to speech development -you are correct in that should not be the

only aspect looked at for your child.

http://my.webmd.com/content/Article/65/72738.htm?pagenumber=1

No matter what -we do know that there are more of our children today

than ever before. We need to know why -and what can we do to

prevent and help. Does this have to do with subtle myelin delays

thus explaining why so many of our children have remarkable surges

on the EFAs? There are many industrial toxins which would impair

the myelin -and other neurological development. (phenol blocks are

used to strip the myelin in medicine -and it's also an industrial

toxin that was found rising as a black ooze through the water 10

minutes from where I used to live

http://www.thnt.com/thnt/story/0,21282,596491,00.html And in other

areas too)

Oh and BTW -Dr. Agin, who is aware of this discussion and is one of

those helping - is " on call " this week at CHILD magazine " Marilyn

Agin, M.D., author of The Late Talker, answers speech disorder

questions. " http://www.child.com/kids/index.jsp

Like I said before " I suspect that if your child is in the rare

percentage where the EFAs do not work -then your child is in the

rare percentage that would have had apraxia anyway before the

dramatic rise in these conditions ten years ago...I believe the EFAs

have either a moderate or dramatic effect depending upon the type of

insult neurologically -what the cause of the apraxia/PDD/ADHD etc.

is. You can check the zip codes for where you worked and lived at

the EPA site http://www.epa.gov They have incredible mapping

ability -or you can just do the easy route and put in your zip here

http://www.epa.gov/epahome/commsearch.htm "

Below is yet another recent article that shows this theory of the

toxin/communication impairment link. We know (or would hope) that

only a small amount, or more likely no members here, used

recreational drugs not approved by their MD while pregnant. This

would mean that most likely toxins in our babies must have come the

new fashioned way -through the soil, water, and air -or food.

Wonder why the heavy emphasis on drug users in the following, and

instead of wondering which drugs were used - just check where these

children are -or where the parents lived/worked when pregnant - what

could have been silent, lurking, and dangerous nearby? Like just

for example...did the researchers from Kalamazoo Michagan bother to

check their zip code at the EPA instead of wondering about drug use

of the parents? I did -and it's not a pretty report. (the zip for

Kalamazoo is 49001 and again -the website to do a quick search is

http://www.epa.gov/epahome/commsearch.htm )

Thu May 29 12:59:27 2003 Pacific Time

Dirty Diapers Help Researchers Pinpoint Fetal Health Risks

KALAMAZOO, Mich., May 29 (AScribe Newswire) -- A team of

researchers, up to their elbows in more than 800 sets of dirty

diapers, have turned the experience into what may be some of the

first conclusive evidence that environmental pollutants can impact

the health and future prospects of children, even before they're

born.

Western Michigan University researchers, working in

cooperation with Kalamazoo's two major hospitals and Michigan State

University's Kalamazoo Center for Medical Studies, have determined

that a startling 50 percent of children born in the area during a

10-month period in 2002 were exposed to lead while still in the womb,

and about 5 percent of babies born had already suffered lead exposure

at levels typically associated with neurological problems.

Exposure in the womb to lead and other toxic chemicals was

analyzed by collecting blood from umbilical cords as well as meconium

samples from the first sets of diapers soiled by newborns. Meconium

is the bowel discharge from infants during their first 24 to 48 hours

of life and reflects the accumulation of bile secreted during the

last five months of gestation.

" What we've done is develop a way to look at the earliest

potential impact of substances on fetal development, " says Dr. Jay

Means, WMU's Gwen Frostic Professor of Environmental Chemistry and

Toxicology and the lead researcher. " We know that many of these

substances have their most profound effects on the developing child,

but so little is known about the exposure of a significant percentage

of the population to these substances. This gives us a snapshot of

that exposure. "

Means says the selection of meconium as a sample to be

analyzed along with the cord blood helps rule out the possibility

that the babies' exposure came in any way other than through the

placental blood barrier.

" It's unambiguous, " he says of the resulting data. " As soon as

the child starts to nurse or eat from other sources, you raise the

possibility of another outside source of contamination. "

Beginning in March 2002, Means along with Dr. Liepman,

director of psychiatry research at MSU/KCMS, and their team worked

with staff members at Borgess Medical Center and Bronson Methodist

Hospital to collect nearly 3,000 cord blood and meconium samples from

newborns. Of those samples, about 800 were complete paired samples

that included both cord blood and meconium. Samples were collected

after receiving anonymous informed consent agreements from mothers

and were then analyzed to ascertain levels of heavy metals,

pesticides, PCBs and herbicides as well as recreational and

psychoactive drugs. About 200 randomly selected samples were screened

to determine whether and how much of a toxic substance was

transferred across the placental blood barrier.

Researchers screened the samples using two sophisticated mass

spectrometer systems to determine fetal exposure to heavy metals such

as lead, mercury, chromium and cadmium; toxic organic compounds like

PCBs and dioxins; and such drugs as cannabis, cocaine,

methamphetamine and cotinine, which comes from nicotine. In addition

to the high levels of lead exposure, researchers found a wide range

of exposure to the other measured substances. For instance, PCBs and

DDT, which can lead to reduced IQ and other developmental problems,

were found in a about 15 percent of the samples. Mercury and cadmium

also showed up in 15 percent of the samples, while the

tobacco-related compound cotinine was found in more than 30 percent

of the samples.

But it was the high incidence of lead that stunned the team,

Means says. He notes that lead exposure has been linked to mental

retardation, seizures, delays in motor development, kidney disease,

and problems with bone and tooth development. Means says that their

measurement tool--the inductively coupled plasma-mass

spectrometer--allows researchers to measure lead in infinitesimal

amounts that are far below the levels at which exposure is considered

dangerous, according to federal guidelines. But unlike other tools,

this one identifies lead with complete certainty. Its presence in so

many of the samples is troubling, he says.

The team completed an initial round of sample collections at

the end of 2002 and, with the results of the analysis in hand, a new

round of research is about to begin. The first round was completed on

a small budget put together with funds from the WMU Office of

Research, the Kalamazoo County Healthy Babies, Healthy Start program,

the National Science Foundation and MSU/KCMS. The project owes its

initial success to what Means calls " excellent cooperation from the

hospitals and the tireless efforts of a dedicated group of

undergraduate student researchers. "

An anonymous $110,000 grant to WMU's Environmental Institute

will help Means launch a new round of research. Goals for the new

round include expanding the number of infants from whom complete

samples are collected; relating the patterns of exposure to

geographical, demographic and dietary data; and adding gene

expression analysis to the tests run on the samples to determine

which genes show signs of being activated or repressed by exposure to

the various toxic chemicals. He also plans to add other substances of

concern to the list of those being studied--like polybrominated

diphenyl ether, commonly known as PBDE, a synthetic fire retardant

chemical used in textiles.

The collection of data about demographics and diet will help

pinpoint the source of exposure, says Means, and the zip code data

will allow his team to cross reference their data with known

pollution " hot spots " being documented by WMU's Great Lakes Center

for Environmental and Molecular Sciences.

One last change to the research protocol would ease the

scientists' concern, but to accomplish it, the team may have to avoid

analyzing samples for illegal substances. Because of the possibility

of finding traces of illegal substances, the blood cord and meconium

samples were collected anonymously.

" Without anonymity, state requirements to report children who

have been exposed to drugs of abuse during pregnancy would make it

impossible to get cooperation from mothers who abuse drugs, " notes

Mean's research colleague Liepman. But because the samples are

collected anonymously, researchers now have no way to provide

feedback to parents whose children may be at risk from high exposure

levels.

" That's disturbing, " Means says. " Ideally we'd like to inform

them of the problem so they can seek help. And, we'd like to follow

up with additional testing of the children down the road and the

involvement of other professionals who can help, like speech

pathologists and those with neurological expertise. " Liepman agrees

and sees a world of potential benefit from the project.

" It is possible we have stumbled upon the cause for a lot of

learning problems, such as dyslexia and attention deficit disorder

and other behavior problems of children in our schools, " Liepman

speculates.

http://www.ascribe.org/cgi-bin/spew4th.pl?ascribeid=20030529.113118 & time=12%2059\

%20PDT & year=2003 & public=1

=====

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

I'm curious.

My daughter is adopted and while not apraxic she has experienced

speech/language delay, has some fine motor delays, has mildly low tone and has

now (at

almost age six) been diagnosed PDD-NOS. Her pre-natal history included drug use

(cocaine) and smoking by birth mother. After reading extensively on the

website and in other locations I began her on a regimen of Pro-EFA. My husband

has

been using fish oil for years with good results and has now added borage oil.

I have noticed subtle things - like engaging in more interactive

conversations, more initiating conversations, more patience in figuring things

out, etc.

So, what I'm curious about is is this typical for chuildren with other

diagnoses?

I appreciate the dialog on this list.

mk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 years later...

Sue wrote:

>

> After doing a coffee enema is it possible to have diareah the get rid

> of the toxins? that is kinda what happened to me today after

> yesterdays coffee enema? Any connection?

==>Yes, it is possible.

Bee

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • 9 months later...
Guest guest

Sue exercising and sweating is vastly superior to soaking in detox

minerals for detoxing, but you may benefit from both. Exercise also

moves the lymph considerably; the lymph can only move with muscle

flex, acceleration and deceleration, and the muscle cells can't tell

the difference between acceleration and deceleration, which is why

even bouncing on a mini-tramp in a sit bounce tones up lots of

muscles that are not directly involved, and moves lymph, your vehicle

for cellular waste, oxygen and nutrition, many times better than

jogging.

Don't they say about 10 minutes of sweating out of a 20-min workout

three times a week? That would be for cardio/calorie expenditure; me,

I'm pretty active plus I walk my dog for 35 minutes four times a

day :) in more of a hunter-gatherer pace with some running and trail

hiking in bursts and some flat walking (and this month some swimming

too!).

Duncan

>

> does anyone know if exercising and sweating is the

> same in regards to removing toxins as soaking in detox

> materials?

>

> I am just beginning exercise and want to know how long

> youneed to build up a sweat to be benificial.

>

> sue

>

>

>

>

______________________________________________________________________

______________

> oneSearch: Finally, mobile search

> that gives answers, not web links.

> http://mobile./mobileweb/onesearch?refer=1ONXIC

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Hi Sue, I recently asked about that, to the biochemist that is helping me

with my health. She has recommended that I sauna 3-4x/week. When I asked

if my daily sweating out in the yard shoveling manure, etc. was just as

good, she said " no " because you are not getting the same amount of direct

heat that you would sitting in the sauna.

Best,

http://www.ChestnutHillDesigns.com

Blog ~ http://shellyct.blogspot.com/

~One can always be kind to people about whom one cares nothing.~

-- Wilde, The Picture of Dorian Gray, 1891

> does anyone know if exercising and sweating is the

> same in regards to removing toxins as soaking in detox

> materials?

>

> I am just beginning exercise and want to know how long

> youneed to build up a sweat to be benificial.

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Well, if I did them like I am supposed to do ;-) I am supposed to stay in

for 30 minutes if I can. Get out if you start to feel light-headed or

yucky. She told me to shower first, to open the pores and and get any

grime/toxins off my body. Get in the prewarmed sauna at 160 to 170F. Bring

a large glass of water (or more) and a towel. She said to wipe off the sweat

as you sweat (to allow you to sweat more and so you don't reabsorb the

toxins), but keep the towel outside the sauna (again, so you don't breath in

or absorb the toxins in the sweat), and drink lots of water. Then when you

are finished, get in the shower again, and wash all the toxins off your skin

(of course using a natural soap, no parabans and all that other toxic crap).

If anyone is nterested, her website is www.vitaroyal.com.

Best,

http://www.ChestnutHillDesigns.com

Blog ~ http://shellyct.blogspot.com/

~One can always be kind to people about whom one cares nothing.~

-- Wilde, The Picture of Dorian Gray, 1891

>

> ,

>

> when you do the sauna's how long do you stay in there?

> do y ou drink anything special while in there?

>

> sue

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Hi,

Do you know if you can get the same benefits in a

steam room as a sauna? I tend to prefer the wet heat

over the dry heat.

Luv,

Debby

San , CA

380/241/170

--- Ives <mmives@...> wrote:

> Well, if I did them like I am supposed to do ;-) I

> am supposed to stay in

> for 30 minutes if I can. Get out if you start to

> feel light-headed or

> yucky. She told me to shower first, to open the

> pores and and get any

> grime/toxins off my body. Get in the prewarmed sauna

> at 160 to 170F. Bring

> a large glass of water (or more) and a towel. She

> said to wipe off the sweat

> as you sweat (to allow you to sweat more and so you

> don't reabsorb the

> toxins), but keep the towel outside the sauna

> (again, so you don't breath in

> or absorb the toxins in the sweat), and drink lots

> of water. Then when you

> are finished, get in the shower again, and wash all

> the toxins off your skin

> (of course using a natural soap, no parabans and all

> that other toxic crap).

>

> If anyone is nterested, her website is

> www.vitaroyal.com.

-------------

Search others for their virtues, thyself for thy vices -- lin

My son Hunter Hudson (10/11/04) http://debbypadilla.0catch.com/hunter/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

The dry sauna is supposed to be better, I beleive because it promotes more

sweating, and the humidity/moisure can be an issue for people with adrenal

fatigue and other metabolic problems (those who need to detox the most).

Best,

http://www.ChestnutHillDesigns.com

Blog ~ http://shellyct.blogspot.com/

~One can always be kind to people about whom one cares nothing.~

-- Wilde, The Picture of Dorian Gray, 1891

>

> Do you know if you can get the same benefits in a

> steam room as a sauna? I tend to prefer the wet heat

> over the dry heat.

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Thanks , good to know!

Luv,

Debby

San , CA

380/240/180

--- Ives <mmives@...> wrote:

> The dry sauna is supposed to be better, I beleive

> because it promotes more

> sweating, and the humidity/moisure can be an issue

> for people with adrenal

> fatigue and other metabolic problems (those who need

> to detox the most).

-------------

Search others for their virtues, thyself for thy vices -- lin

New group! Curing Candida:

curingcandida/

My son Hunter Hudson (10/11/04) http://debbypadilla.0catch.com/hunter/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...
Guest guest

Hi Amy,

The same thing happens to me, too. I don't think it is that you are becoming

more sensitive in that your body can't handle these things anymore. I think it

is more of case that now that your body is getting stronger, it recognizes toxic

elements more acutely and is basically telling to stay away from those things.

Of course, this is not the scientific explanation; it's just my interpretation

of things!

>

> I notice now that when I smell strong product scents (i.e. husband's shaving

cream) it burns my throat when it used to smell good to me?! Is my body

figuring out what is toxic and becoming more sensitive to toxins?

> Amy

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

>

>

> >

> > I notice now that when I smell strong product scents (i.e. husband's shaving

cream) it burns my throat when it used to smell good to me?! Is my body

figuring out what is toxic and becoming more sensitive to toxins?

> > Amy

> >

>

Amy this happens to me too now that I am on Bee's diet. I get a burning feeling

in my throat and within some minutes I start having headache and feeling tired.

I can't even polish my nails anymore.. I wish the explanation of is

right! I like that theory.....

Marisa

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...