Re: Re: Transcript - Offit & $$ made - Vaccine Exemptions'? Call Them What They Rea

[Guest guest]

Offit is such a moron and an asswipe!

While doing some continuing education for my RN license I read that in the US one in two males and one in three females will be diagnosed with cancer at some point in their lifetimes. Considering the fact that most vaccines given to our children contain formaldehyde, I’m surprised those numbers aren’t higher (though I’m sure they will be in a few years). For that reason alone, EVERYONE should flat out refuse ANY vaccine that contains this ingredient!

If you go to the CDC’s website (www.cdc.gov) and then do a search for “vaccine excipient and media summary) you can download a list of vaccines and the ingredients each contains in addition to the antigen. Mindboggling to see how many contain thimerosal (mercury), aluminum, MSG, and other crap. But a very simple argument is that about a year ago the US government declared that formaldehyde is a known carcinogen. How in the world can anyone justify taking a chance injecting such an ingredient into our babies, children, elderly, and ourselves? There aren’t enough Komen walks and pink ribbons in the world for that! It is just plain stupid to get out and donate, raise money, participate in all these pink things, and celebrate “cancer survivors” while turning around and injecting everyone with known carcinogens and yakking about how we need more research, etc to find the “cure”! Here is one “cure”-Don’t give yourself and your family cancer to start with!!!!!!

Janet-One pissed off, fed up RN mom of a vaccine injured son!

Sheri .. thanks for posting Offit's " remarks "

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Reading Offit's infantile descriptions of three vaccine exemptions .. medical .. philosophical .. religious .. explains why this man refuses to engage in a nationally televised public debate regarding the " safety and efficiency " of public health vaccines and the policies by which they are administered.

#1 .. Medical exemptions .. Offit states: " a person may have a contraindication to getting a vaccine. Some people are allergic to gelatin. Gelatin is used as a stabilizer in the chickenpox vaccine and in the nasal spray influenza vaccine. That would be a reasonable reason not to get a vaccine "

ANS: How does any pediatrician or parent know if their child may be allergic to the " numerous " chemicals .. besides Gelatin .. that are among the dozens routinely used in childhood vaccines? What tests for " allergies " do pediatricians give children prior to receiving HEP B within hours of birth .. or .. even more reckless .. the numerous vaccines given in the first year of life in the USA?

Indeed .. not knowing a child's allergies prior to vaccinations is more than enough reason for every child to automatically receive a medical exemption from vaccines .. until the pediatrician can guarantee parents he has tested the child for allergies to every ingredient in the vaccines he administers.

#2 .. Philosophical exemptions .. Offit states: " First of all, the notion that vaccines are a " philosophy " is inaccurate. Philo means love, sophos means wisdom. Exactly where is the wisdom in saying that it is better not to get vaccines than to get them? "

ANS: It is Offit .. not parents .. who has a philosophical love of vaccines .. that overrides his wisdom. Exactly where is the wisdom in saying that it is better to get vaccines than not get them ... when everyone .. including a majority of the Supreme Court .. labels them ... " unavoidably unsafe " .

#3 .. Religious exemptions .. Offit states: " Religion is a belief system. Religion is a faith-based system. Science and medicine are evidence-based systems. They are data-based systems, not beliefs. If you want to feel better about vaccine use, I think one needs only to look at the roughly 20,000 studies that have evaluated the safety or efficacy of vaccines, or the hundreds of studies that have looked at what happens when you combine vaccines and give them at the same time to feel confident that, in fact, there are data to support that choice " .

ANS: This is .. albeit unintentionally .. a stunning admission by Offit .. that over 200 years of diligent pursuit of evidenced-based systems .. regarding the safety and efficiency of vaccines .. has produced what Offit himself describes as .. inclusive data.

I honestly think we have been blessed to have this man as the " spokesman " for the entire vaccine industry.

--

Janet Presson, R.N., M.Ed.

President

A Small Miracle, Inc.

office

cell

www.asmallmiracleinc.com

-- This electronic message (e-mail) and any documents accompanying this

message may contain confidential information that is privileged. This

information is intended only for the use of the recipient named above. If

you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by

telephone at 1- to arrange for return of the documents to us and

you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copy, distribution, or taking

of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly

prohibited.

[Guest guest]

wonderful - you are right, in the long run we have been blessed - but the

people don't see it, alas.

thanks for sharing this

Sheri

At 01:48 PM 8/16/2012, you wrote:

Sheri .. thanks for posting

Offit's " remarks "

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Reading Offit's infantile descriptions of three vaccine exemptions ..

medical .. philosophical .. religious .. explains why this man refuses to

engage in a nationally televised public debate regarding the " safety

and efficiency " of public health vaccines and the policies by which

they are administered.

#1 .. Medical exemptions .. Offit states: " a person

may have a contraindication to getting a vaccine. Some people are

allergic to gelatin. Gelatin is used as a stabilizer in the

chickenpox vaccine and in the nasal spray influenza vaccine. That

would be a reasonable reason not to get a vaccine "

ANS: How does any pediatrician or parent know if their child

may be allergic to the " numerous " chemicals .. besides Gelatin

... that are among the dozens routinely used in childhood vaccines?

What tests for " allergies " do pediatricians give children prior

to receiving HEP B within hours of birth .. or .. even more reckless ..

the numerous vaccines given in the first year of life in the USA?

Indeed .. not knowing a child's allergies prior to

vaccinations is more than enough reason for every child to

automatically receive a medical exemption from vaccines .. until

the pediatrician can guarantee parents he has tested the child for

allergies to every ingredient in the vaccines he administers.

#2 .. Philosophical exemptions .. Offit states:

" First of all, the notion that vaccines are a

" philosophy " is inaccurate. Philo means love, sophos

means wisdom. Exactly where is the wisdom in saying that it is

better not to get vaccines than to get them? "

ANS: It is Offit .. not parents .. who has a

philosophical love of vaccines .. that overrides his

wisdom. Exactly where is the wisdom in saying that it is

better to get vaccines than not get them ... when everyone .. including a

majority of the Supreme Court .. labels them ... " unavoidably

unsafe " .

#3 .. Religious exemptions .. Offit states:

" Religion is a belief system. Religion is a faith-based

system. Science and medicine are evidence-based systems. They

are data-based systems, not beliefs. If you want to feel better

about vaccine use, I think one needs only to look at the roughly 20,000

studies that have evaluated the safety or efficacy of vaccines, or the

hundreds of studies that have looked at what happens when you combine

vaccines and give them at the same time to feel confident that, in fact,

there are data to support that choice " .

ANS: This is .. albeit unintentionally .. a stunning

admission by Offit .. that over 200 years of diligent pursuit of

evidenced-based systems .. regarding the safety and efficiency of

vaccines .. has produced what Offit himself describes as ..

inclusive data.

I honestly think we have been blessed to have this man as the

" spokesman " for the entire vaccine industry.

[Guest guest]

amen sister RN.

Sheri

At 04:06 PM 8/16/2012, you wrote:

Offit is

such a moron and an asswipe!

While doing some continuing education for my RN license I read that in

the US one in two males and one in three females will be diagnosed with

cancer at some point in their lifetimes. Considering the fact that

most vaccines given to our children contain formaldehyde, I’m surprised

those numbers aren’t higher (though I’m sure they will be in a few

years). For that reason alone, EVERYONE should flat out refuse ANY

vaccine that contains this ingredient!

If you go to the CDC’s website

(www.cdc.gov) and then

do a search for “vaccine excipient and media summary) you can download a

list of vaccines and the ingredients each contains in addition to the

antigen. Mindboggling to see how many contain thimerosal (mercury),

aluminum, MSG, and other crap. But a very simple argument is that

about a year ago the US government declared that formaldehyde is a known

carcinogen. How in the world can anyone justify taking a chance

injecting such an ingredient into our babies, children, elderly, and

ourselves? There aren’t enough Komen walks and pink ribbons in the

world for that! It is just plain stupid to get out and donate,

raise money, participate in all these pink things, and celebrate “cancer

survivors” while turning around and injecting everyone with known

carcinogens and yakking about how we need more research, etc to find the

“cure”! Here is one “cure”-Don’t give yourself and your family

cancer to start with!!!!!!

Janet-One pissed off, fed up RN mom of a vaccine injured son!

On 8/16/12 4:48 PM,

" Rmoffi@... "

wrote:

Sheri .. thanks for posting Offit's " remarks "

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Reading Offit's infantile descriptions of three vaccine exemptions ..

medical .. philosophical .. religious .. explains why this man refuses to

engage in a nationally televised public debate regarding the " safety

and efficiency " of public health vaccines and the policies by which

they are administered.

#1 .. Medical exemptions .. Offit states: " a person may

have a contraindication to getting a vaccine. Some people are

allergic to gelatin. Gelatin is used as a stabilizer in the

chickenpox vaccine and in the nasal spray influenza vaccine. That

would be a reasonable reason not to get a vaccine "

ANS: How does any pediatrician or parent know if their child

may be allergic to the " numerous " chemicals .. besides Gelatin

... that are among the dozens routinely used in childhood vaccines?

What tests for " allergies " do pediatricians give children prior

to receiving HEP B within hours of birth .. or .. even more reckless ..

the numerous vaccines given in the first year of life in the USA?

Indeed .. not knowing a child's allergies prior to

vaccinations is more than enough reason for every child to

automatically receive a medical exemption from vaccines .. until the

pediatrician can guarantee parents he has tested the child for allergies

to every ingredient in the vaccines he administers.

#2 .. Philosophical exemptions .. Offit states: " First of

all, the notion that vaccines are a " philosophy " is

inaccurate. Philo means love, sophos means wisdom. Exactly

where is the wisdom in saying that it is better not to get vaccines than

to get them? "

ANS: It is Offit .. not parents .. who has a philosophical

love of vaccines .. that overrides his wisdom. Exactly

where is the wisdom in saying that it is better to get vaccines than not

get them ... when everyone .. including a majority of the Supreme Court

... labels them ... " unavoidably unsafe " .

#3 .. Religious exemptions .. Offit states: " Religion

is a belief system. Religion is a faith-based system. Science

and medicine are evidence-based systems. They are data-based

systems, not beliefs. If you want to feel better about vaccine use,

I think one needs only to look at the roughly 20,000 studies that have

evaluated the safety or efficacy of vaccines, or the hundreds of studies

that have looked at what happens when you combine vaccines and give them

at the same time to feel confident that, in fact, there are data to

support that choice " .

ANS: This is .. albeit unintentionally .. a stunning admission

by Offit .. that over 200 years of diligent pursuit of evidenced-based

systems .. regarding the safety and efficiency of vaccines .. has

produced what Offit himself describes as .. inclusive data.

I honestly think we have been blessed to have this man as the

" spokesman " for the entire vaccine industry.

--

Janet Presson, R.N., M.Ed.

President

A Small Miracle, Inc.

office

cell

www.asmallmiracleinc.com

-- This electronic message (e-mail) and any documents accompanying

this

message may contain confidential information that is privileged.

This

information is intended only for the use of the recipient named

above. If

you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately

by

telephone at 1- to arrange for return of the documents to us

and

you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copy, distribution, or

taking

of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is

strictly

prohibited.