Guest guest Posted February 13, 2008 Report Share Posted February 13, 2008 I am recently getting back into shape after letting myself go for about 3 years. Aside from the appearance of the body fat, the main motivator that got me back at it was injuries. I tried to go back to Aikido, and kept having nagging injuries, mostly on one side. I am noticing now that the easily injured side is much weaker. I did squats in front of a mirror last week and I thought my pelvis was crooked at the bottom... it turned out that it's just the upper quads and hip flexors are so much bigger on one side that they seem to push my t-shirt up almost 2 inches higher on that side when I'm down near thighs-parallel to the ground. Anyway, I'm wondering if anyone thinks unilateral training for the weak side is a good idea. I have always heard that it is not a good idea, along with talk about some kind of " rebound effect " . The idea seems to be that it is better to train bilaterally hard, and the weak side will catch up. I am a little skeptical. Back when I was at my strongest, doing pullups and dips with heavy weight strapped on, I still had some pain problems on the weak side. I finally videotaped myself and found that I was twisting during the heavy pullups and levering the weak side up first. Perhaps the answer to this is to make sure to have more symmetric form, but I still think it shows that despite significant bilateral improvement, the weak side was still weaker and more injury prone. I guess I am wondering if it wouldn't be better in the long run to do something in the way of undertraining the strong side for a while now, until the weak one catches up, then proceed with fully bilateral training. Any ideas? Wilbanks Wisconsin, USA Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.