Guest guest Posted December 10, 2008 Report Share Posted December 10, 2008 > On many occasions Wayne Gretzky explained his unbelievable success > in hockey by his ability to be not where a pack is at the moment, > but to always be where it will be in the next moment. Why don’t we > have hundreds of Wayne Gretzkys? Many practice deliberately and > extremely hard, in accordance with the expert performance > approach.As Wayne Gretzky’s and one of his manager’s quotes > indicate, he has a unique type of mental representations and, as a > result, metacognitive abilities. We do not know for sure whether > deliberate practice alone shaped these abilities or it only > crystallized them Telle--- There was a " TOP GUN " fighter aircraft training program on one of the discovery channels recently. The instructor was saying how " some just have it and most don't. Some guys can see the whole field instantly and, get this, have a 6th mind sense that predicts the future maybe 500 ms. forward??, an eternity at 600 mph. I'm willing to bet that none of these guys were flying jets at the critical learning stages. I'm sure that todays video games have an effect on these characteristics. What is not commonly realized is that all of us can not only see and attend to, in conscious awareness, straight ahead but 180° peripherally, or slightly more, to both sides at the same time. One series of fascinating " precognition " experiments had subjects predicting the future up to 3 seconds, albeit at NAA non aware awareness levels and at very simple tasks, This facet of intuition is now termed implicit awareness? The implication. I came away from some of these articles with the impression that todays the researchers believed to be below any recognizable awareness. Not so. I have these somewhere. Jerry Telle lakewood CO USA Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 10, 2008 Report Share Posted December 10, 2008 In a message dated 12/10/2008 10:33:38 A.M. Central America Standard, JRTELLE@... writes: I'm sure that todays video games have an effect on these characteristics. Hi Jerry! Excellent point! I'm a big NASCAR fan (kind of like track...go first, turn left). Note the following which seems to corroborate your observation: In his book Driver #8, Dale Earnhardt Jr. talks about playing video simulation games to familiarize himself with various tracks. “People in the media wanted to know the secret to my success at Watkins Glen,†noted Earnhardt. “ That’s easy, I tell them. It’s video games. The games help me with simple stuff, like the way the track goes left and right, but more importantly, where the shift points and breaking points are. When I get back out on the track, it ’s amazing how similar the real thing is to the game.†When I shared this with my students, one of them pointed out that Ichiro did the same thing to familiarize himself with American pitchers. Ken Jakalski Lisle HS Lisle, IL USA Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 11, 2008 Report Share Posted December 11, 2008 In a message dated 12/11/2008 11:35:49 A.M. Central America Standard, JRTELLE@... writes: Are there any devices to train the peripheral aspects of perception? ********* Hi Jerry! Excellent question! I believe there is at least one company that believes vision training is the 'last frontier' in the world of sports performance. HRA Sportsvision offers a line of products intended to improve things like binocularity, tracking, focus, depth perception, and peripheral vision. I haven't tried any of these. Some of the devices would seem to have a market appeal just because they are so unique, and tap into an area of sports training that still new to many. One such device--called the Lightning Rod--is series of lights designed to fire at different speeds to test and train eye movements and hand speed. I think The Lightning Rod sells for a thousand dollars. Ken Jakalski Lisle HS Lisle, IL USA Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 11, 2008 Report Share Posted December 11, 2008 > When I get back out on the track, it > ’s amazing how similar the real thing is to the game.” > When I shared this with my students, one of them pointed out that > Ichiro did > the same thing to familiarize himself with American pitchers. Hi Ken, Are there any devices to train the peripheral aspects of perception? and is there a name for vertical top-bottom aspects-- These horizontal and vertical peripherals?? are typically outside of " normal " ' awareness -- but easily learned. I'm sure all great foot and basketballers use this -- again maybe w/out direct awareness. The mind only processes about a cogillion things at the the same time. One term I have used is " diffused focus " to describe this 360° perception. This basically is discontinuing stereoscopic articulation which brings the rest of the visual field into easier recognition. Obviously the more intent the stereoscopic focus, as in life threatening circumstances, the more the visual field collapses/narrows and the less the other aspects are recognizable -- probably even the " outside of conscious awareness perceptions " ??. All of this awareness stuff is beyond fascinating with much really good research identifying more and more of how much we are aware of with out consciously attending to it -- even the psychic predicting the future " precognition " stuff. Jerry Telle Lakewood CO USA Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 11, 2008 Report Share Posted December 11, 2008 Dr. Klawans also mentions video games as an example of nurturing visual-motor skills during critical periods: " ...give an adult computer pro a Nintendo, match her against an eight-year-old kid who can barely read the instructions, and see how well the adult does. Reading the instructions is scarcely a necessity for kids raised with computers. The games are visual and the rules are all pretty much the same and easily learned by visual-motor experience. So what happens? The kids wins--every time, day in, day out, year after year. The adult who first played such games as an adult can never catch up, and each year another crop of kids can and do beat him. Why? The adult computer pro was too old when he got started. In our terms [neurologists] there is a critical period for acquiring this nonverbal visual-motor skill, and if you first start to learn it after that period you can never really master it. " At one point in his book Klawans even wonders if we are doing a service to kids by having them hit baseballs off a T-stand during this critical window of opportunity. Ken Jakalski Lisle HS Lisle, IL USA Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 11, 2008 Report Share Posted December 11, 2008 The below seems relevant to recent discussions: Taken from Training in Sport (1996) - Abernethy et al., state: TRAINING PERCEPTUAL-MOTOR SKILLS FOR SPORT Methods and implications for training It is apparent from the preceding section that (a) increased automation of movement execution and control is indeed an important, distinguishing characteristic of highly skilled sports performance and that (, extrapolating from the cognitive skills literature (especially Spelke et aL, 1976), performance and long-term improvements in primary skill automatization are possible through extended periods of dual-task practice. These observations clearly suggest that there may be considerable value in employing progressively more demanding dual-task conditions in practice as a means of providing an ongoing stimulus for the automation of primary task movement control (Schneider, 1985). As skill development appears to be an ongoing process even for expert performers (Crossman, 1959; sson, et aL, 1993) continued attentional overload in practice may be a valuable rneans of facilitating continuous improvements in the movement execution and control skills of athletes. Such progressive overload could be achieved through either the addition of a more demanding secondary task or, if necessary, the addition of a third concurrent task. Examples of the applicaion of such training methods (or empirical examinations of the effectiveless of such methods) are currently lacking from the motor skills iterature. SOME CONCLUDING REMARKS Skilled perceptual-motor performances of elite athletes provide wonderful examples of the incredible movement capabilities of humans and of the extent to which intensive training can result in skill mastery. Underlying the elegant simplicity and apparent ease of expert sports performance is a level of complexity that sports scientists are only beginning appreciate. Skilled sports performance results not simply from muscular art but from a bewildering array of perceptual, decision-making and movevement execution and control processes, each refined and coupled to ers as a consequence of task- specific practice. " " ==================== Carruthers Wakefield, UK > > Dr. Klawans also mentions video games as an example of nurturing > visual-motor skills during critical periods: > > " ...give an adult computer pro a Nintendo, match her against an > eight-year-old kid who can barely read the instructions, and see how well the adult does. > Reading the instructions is scarcely a necessity for kids raised with > computers. The games are visual and the rules are all pretty much the same and > easily learned by visual-motor experience. > > So what happens? > > The kids wins--every time, day in, day out, year after year. The adult who > first played such games as an adult can never catch up, and each year another > crop of kids can and do beat him. Why? The adult computer pro was too old > when he got started. In our terms [neurologists] there is a critical period > for acquiring this nonverbal visual-motor skill, and if you first start to > learn it after that period you can never really master it. " > > At one point in his book Klawans even wonders if we are doing a service to > kids by having them hit baseballs off a T-stand during this critical window of > opportunity. > > Ken Jakalski > Lisle HS > Lisle, IL USA > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 11, 2008 Report Share Posted December 11, 2008 " " The past decade has seen a proliferation of generalised visual training programmes arising from sports optometry in North America which claim to be able to improve sports performance through enhancing visual performance. These commercially available generalised visual training programmes (such as on and Reilly's 1975 Visiondynamics; Revien and Gabor's 1981 Sports Vision; Revien's 1987 Eyerobics; Seiderman and Schneider's 1983 The Athletic Eye; and more recently the Sports Vision Manuals of the American Optometrical Association) are direct adaptations of programmes used previously in clinical and behavioural optometry in an attempt to enhance the vision of children, particularly those experiencing reading difficulties. The programmes involve the use of simple, repetitive eye exercises (e.g., at tempting to read an eye chart while bouncing on a trampoline) and in some instances relatively simple training apparatus (such as the Wayne Saccadic Fixator and the Brock string-a length of string of some 3-6 m (10-20 ft) upon which are attached a number of beads which act as fixation points). In all cases the training stimuli are simple and non-sport-specific and the train ing approach is based on simple repetition and progression of a type reminiscent of physical training regimes. The authors and clinical users of these programmes typically make very strong claims about the overall effectiveness of generalised visual training and the relatively limited training time which is needed in order to reap benefits. For example, Revien (1987) claims Eyerobics, a video-based home training package '. . . improves physical and mental performance and reduces visual fatigue'. Similarly Revien and Gabor's (1981) Sports Vision text includes such claims as: visual training. . . may well make the difference between winning and losing, between revelling in keen competition or shrinking from it. .. . . fixated objects actually appear larger than they are, speeding objects seen to move more slowly, and things once unseen in the corner of the eye suddenly appear in sharp focus. It is obviously tempting, given the claims made by these programmes and the historical absence of any alternative perceptual training guidelines from sports science, for coaches and athletes to use such approaches. However, despite their increasing popularity, the evidence to support the effectiveness of these programmes is almost exclusively anecdotal and consequently subject to all kinds of biases and expectancy effects. There is virtually no empirical evidence to demonstrate the effectiveness of these generalised visual training programmes nor, on the grounds of the evidence reviewed in the previous section, any principled a priori grounds to expect such non- specific training to indeed be useful. A number of recent reviews of the sports vision literature both by optometrists (e.g., Stine et aL, 1982; Reichow and Stern, 1986) and sport scientists (e.g., Abernethy, 1986; Landers, 1988; Leibowitz, Yinger and Landers, 1989) have highlighted this dearth of controlled studies on the effectiveness of generalised visual training programmes for sport. If generalised visual training is to be effective three basic assumptions must be fulfilled, namely: (1) Generalised visual skills must playa major role in superior sports performance. (2) Such genera Ii sed visual skills must be able to be trained. (3) Improved generalised visual skills must translate directly to improved sports performance (Stine et aL, 1982). A significant body of knowledge exists with respect to the first assumption, but this evidence (as revealed in the earlier section) argues against a major role for generalised visual skills in expert performance. The evidence indicates that generalised visual skills do not constitute an important factor discriminating the performance of the expert from the novice. With respect to the second assumption, a substantial body of evidence exists within the clinical optometry literature to suggest that most commonly measured visual functions such as foveal acuity (Wittenberg, Brock and Folsom, 1969; McKee and Westheimer, 1978; Fendick and Westheimer, 1983), peripheral acuity (Low, 1946; Saugstad and Lie, 1964; Fendick and Westheimer, 1983), peripheral motion thresholds ( and Leibowitz, 1974) and visual field expanses (Sailor, 1973; Wood, Wild, Hussey and Crews, 1987) can indeed be improved with practice. " " ========================= Carruthers Wakefield, UK Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.