Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Bench Press?

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

There are certainly other reasons to use the bench press. We just hosted a

seminar with Charlie Francis and he made a point that goes counter to all the

proponents of sports specificity.

As an example, when tapering a sprinter for the 100 meter, as they got close to

the actual event, the bench press was used in place of more lower body dominant

exercises for the “stimulus” rather than for building strong pushing muscles.

Charlie reasoned that the bench press utilizes 35% of all the motor units in the

body versus say a deadlift, squat or power clean which may use 70 to 90% of all

the motor units in the body. This way the athlete can stimulate the body

without over taxing it so close to the actual event.

One would be wise to investigate this idea when training athletes! It can make

the difference between a PR and a pulled muscle or worse!

Mike Doyle, NSCA-CPT, CSCS

COR Performance

Layton, Utah

www.corperformancetraining.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Mike Doyle wrote:

>There are certainly other reasons to use the bench press. We just hosted a

seminar with Charlie Francis and he made a point that goes counter to all the

proponents of sports specificity.

>

>As an example, when tapering a sprinter for the 100 meter, as they got close to

the actual event, the bench press was used in place of more lower body dominant

exercises for the “stimulus” rather than for building strong pushing muscles.

Charlie reasoned that the bench press utilizes 35% of all the motor units in the

body versus say a deadlift, squat or power clean which may use 70 to 90% of all

the motor units in the body. This way the athlete can stimulate the body

without over taxing it so close to the actual event.

>

>One would be wise to investigate this idea when training athletes! It can make

the difference between a PR and a pulled muscle or worse!

>

****

I don't see that being a good idea at all. There are a lot better ways

to get a lower stimulus than simply choosing a crappy exercise because

it doesn't work as much! What next - triceps kickbacks because they only

use 2%?

During the taper you should be focused on technical aspects of the

event. I don't see why you would bench or deadlift or do any slow

movements at all. If I was using Charlie's reasoning I would be doing a

db snatch or something like that.

OTOH, I've never trained anyone to a 9.79....

:^)

--

Hobman

Saskatoon, CANADA

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

A small study I published a few years ago (N=15 as I recall) of elite discus

throwers (threw 60 meters or more; sample included several world record holders

and Olympic medalists; Fahey,

T.D Predictors of performance in elite discus throwers Biol.Sport 19:103-108,

2002) found that bench press was the best predictor of performance in those

athletes— better than vertical jump, standing long jump, 50 yard dash, snatch,

power clean, deadlift, incline press, or standing throw. Of course, this doesn't

mean that bench press is the best exercise to improve discus performance but it

was the best predictor. The sample included several of the best discus throwers

of all-time.

My old training partner Dave Weil and also Ludvik Danek had poor bench presses

(<135 kg) but were both Olympic medal winners in the event (they weren't in the

study). On the other hand, throwers like Ben Plunknet, Mac Wilkins, Al Oerter,

and Art Burns (Jarred Rome today) had monster bench presses close to 270 kg. I'm

not sure what these results of my study mean (if anything), but it might be a

mistake to ignore bench press strength in some power sports.

Tom Fahey

Dept Kinesiology

Cal State Univ, Chico

Chico, CA 95929-0330

Re: Bench Press?

Mike Doyle wrote:

>There are certainly other reasons to use the bench press. We just hosted a

seminar with Charlie Francis and he made a point that goes counter to all the

proponents of sports specificity.

>

>As an example, when tapering a sprinter for the 100 meter, as they got close to

the actual event, the bench press was used in place of more lower body dominant

exercises for the “stimulus†rather than for building strong pushing

muscles.

Charlie reasoned that the bench press utilizes 35% of all the motor units in the

body versus say a deadlift, squat or power clean which may use 70 to 90% of all

the motor units in the body. This way the athlete can stimulate the body

without over taxing it so close to the actual event.

>

>One would be wise to investigate this idea when training athletes! It can make

the difference between a PR and a pulled muscle or worse!

>

=======================

I don't see that being a good idea at all. There are a lot better ways

to get a lower stimulus than simply choosing a crappy exercise because

it doesn't work as much! What next - triceps kickbacks because they only

use 2%?

During the taper you should be focused on technical aspects of the

event. I don't see why you would bench or deadlift or do any slow

movements at all. If I was using Charlie's reasoning I would be doing a

db snatch or something like that.

OTOH, I've never trained anyone to a 9.79....

:^)

============================

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

I've helped train someone to a 10.1 and I have no idea what Francis is talking

about.

(Robt Zmelik, '96 Olympics decathlon 7th)

W.G.

Ubermensch Sports Consultancy

San Diego, CA

===============================

Jon Haddan wrote: " OTOH, I've

never trained anyone to a 9.79.... "

Neither has Charlie Francis (legally).

Jon Haddan

Irvine, CA

--- Hobman wrote:

> Mike Doyle wrote:

>

> >There are certainly other reasons to use the bench

> press. We just hosted a seminar with Charlie

> Francis and he made a point that goes counter to all

> the proponents of sports specificity.

> >

> >As an example, when tapering a sprinter for the 100

> meter, as they got close to the actual event, the

> bench press was used in place of more lower body

> dominant exercises for the “stimulus” rather than

> for building strong pushing muscles. Charlie

> reasoned that the bench press utilizes 35% of all

> the motor units in the body versus say a deadlift,

> squat or power clean which may use 70 to 90% of all

> the motor units in the body. This way the athlete

> can stimulate the body without over taxing it so

> close to the actual event.

> >

> >One would be wise to investigate this idea when

> training athletes! It can make the difference

> between a PR and a pulled muscle or worse!

> >

>

> ****

> I don't see that being a good idea at all. There are

> a lot better ways

> to get a lower stimulus than simply choosing a

> crappy exercise because

> it doesn't work as much! What next - triceps

> kickbacks because they only

> use 2%?

>

> During the taper you should be focused on technical

> aspects of the

> event. I don't see why you would bench or deadlift

> or do any slow

> movements at all. If I was using Charlie's reasoning

> I would be doing a

> db snatch or something like that.

>

> OTOH, I've never trained anyone to a 9.79....

>

> :^)

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...