Guest guest Posted February 13, 2006 Report Share Posted February 13, 2006 Wow, such fun on the horizon. <Matsumura_Clan@...> wrote: Radiology, Vol 193, 375-382, Copyright © 1994 by Radiological Society of North America Lung changes in rheumatoid arthritis: CT findings M Remy-Jardin, J Remy, B Cortet, F Mauri and B Delcambre Department of Radiology, Hopital Calmette, Lille, France. PURPOSE: To evaluate lung changes in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors reviewed the computed tomographic (CT) scans from 84 patients with RA with a mean articular disease duration (+/- standard deviation) of 12 years +/- 8 (range, 0.3-45 years). Fifteen patients underwent sequential CT evaluation during 5-65- month follow-up (mean, 18 months). RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients (49%) had abnormal CT scans showing the following abnormalities: (a) bronchiectasis and/or bronchiolectasis (n = 23, 30%), ( pulmonary nodules (n = 17, 22%), © subpleural micronodules and/or pseudoplaques (n = 13, 17%), (d) nonseptal linear attenuation (n = 14, 18%), (e) areas of ground-glass attenuation (n = 11, 14%), and (f) honeycombing (n = 8, 10%). Abnormal CT examinations were recorded in 11 of 38 asymptomatic patients (29%) and 27 of 39 symptomatic patients (69%). The following CT abnormalities were found with a significantly higher frequency among patients with respiratory symptoms: (a) bronchiectasis and/or bronchiolectasis, ( rounded areas of attenuation, © areas of ground-glass attenuation, and (d) honeycombing. CONCLUSION: CT may be a useful noninvasive tool for recognition of RA-associated lung disease with special emphasis on bronchial and bronchiolar changes. http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/2/375 Not an MD I'll tell you where to go! Mayo Clinic in Rochester http://www.mayoclinic.org/rochester s Hopkins Medicine http://www.hopkinsmedicine.org Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 13, 2006 Report Share Posted February 13, 2006 My Ra has been seronegative for four years now, my lung disease is what finally confirmed mt diagnoses. WI " C. Y. " <cjmy3454@...> wrote: Wow, such fun on the horizon. <Matsumura_Clan@...> wrote: Radiology, Vol 193, 375-382, Copyright © 1994 by Radiological Society of North America Lung changes in rheumatoid arthritis: CT findings M Remy-Jardin, J Remy, B Cortet, F Mauri and B Delcambre Department of Radiology, Hopital Calmette, Lille, France. PURPOSE: To evaluate lung changes in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors reviewed the computed tomographic (CT) scans from 84 patients with RA with a mean articular disease duration (+/- standard deviation) of 12 years +/- 8 (range, 0.3-45 years). Fifteen patients underwent sequential CT evaluation during 5-65- month follow-up (mean, 18 months). RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients (49%) had abnormal CT scans showing the following abnormalities: (a) bronchiectasis and/or bronchiolectasis (n = 23, 30%), ( pulmonary nodules (n = 17, 22%), © subpleural micronodules and/or pseudoplaques (n = 13, 17%), (d) nonseptal linear attenuation (n = 14, 18%), (e) areas of ground-glass attenuation (n = 11, 14%), and (f) honeycombing (n = 8, 10%). Abnormal CT examinations were recorded in 11 of 38 asymptomatic patients (29%) and 27 of 39 symptomatic patients (69%). The following CT abnormalities were found with a significantly higher frequency among patients with respiratory symptoms: (a) bronchiectasis and/or bronchiolectasis, ( rounded areas of attenuation, © areas of ground-glass attenuation, and (d) honeycombing. CONCLUSION: CT may be a useful noninvasive tool for recognition of RA-associated lung disease with special emphasis on bronchial and bronchiolar changes. http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/2/375 Not an MD I'll tell you where to go! Mayo Clinic in Rochester http://www.mayoclinic.org/rochester s Hopkins Medicine http://www.hopkinsmedicine.org Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 13, 2006 Report Share Posted February 13, 2006 I am stil seronegative too but the symptoms are there, no mistake. I am holding my own for now.... while it lasts. To All: How have you been diagnosed with RA? SOme of you really are having a rough deal. susan smith <bizzare48@...> wrote: My Ra has been seronegative for four years now, my lung disease is what finally confirmed mt diagnoses. WI " C. Y. " <cjmy3454@...> wrote: Wow, such fun on the horizon. <Matsumura_Clan@...> wrote: Radiology, Vol 193, 375-382, Copyright © 1994 by Radiological Society of North America Lung changes in rheumatoid arthritis: CT findings M Remy-Jardin, J Remy, B Cortet, F Mauri and B Delcambre Department of Radiology, Hopital Calmette, Lille, France. PURPOSE: To evaluate lung changes in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors reviewed the computed tomographic (CT) scans from 84 patients with RA with a mean articular disease duration (+/- standard deviation) of 12 years +/- 8 (range, 0.3-45 years). Fifteen patients underwent sequential CT evaluation during 5-65- month follow-up (mean, 18 months). RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients (49%) had abnormal CT scans showing the following abnormalities: (a) bronchiectasis and/or bronchiolectasis (n = 23, 30%), ( pulmonary nodules (n = 17, 22%), © subpleural micronodules and/or pseudoplaques (n = 13, 17%), (d) nonseptal linear attenuation (n = 14, 18%), (e) areas of ground-glass attenuation (n = 11, 14%), and (f) honeycombing (n = 8, 10%). Abnormal CT examinations were recorded in 11 of 38 asymptomatic patients (29%) and 27 of 39 symptomatic patients (69%). The following CT abnormalities were found with a significantly higher frequency among patients with respiratory symptoms: (a) bronchiectasis and/or bronchiolectasis, ( rounded areas of attenuation, © areas of ground-glass attenuation, and (d) honeycombing. CONCLUSION: CT may be a useful noninvasive tool for recognition of RA-associated lung disease with special emphasis on bronchial and bronchiolar changes. http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/2/375 Not an MD I'll tell you where to go! Mayo Clinic in Rochester http://www.mayoclinic.org/rochester s Hopkins Medicine http://www.hopkinsmedicine.org Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 13, 2006 Report Share Posted February 13, 2006 I too have had all the systems for over five years and have been seeing a rheumy for most of the time, i also have Osteo quite bad in knees ankles and spine. But because I was seronegative it was so hard to get a diagnosis. I was taking Ra meds but still no definite diagnosis, until I got pneumonia again , 5Th time in last few years, and ended up in hospital and it was then discovered I had RA lung,Next time I saw my rheumy she said " Oh Shit " I started on humiria the next week! in WI " C. Y. " <cjmy3454@...> wrote: I am stil seronegative too but the symptoms are there, no mistake. I am holding my own for now.... while it lasts. To All: How have you been diagnosed with RA? SOme of you really are having a rough deal. susan smith <bizzare48@...> wrote: My Ra has been seronegative for four years now, my lung disease is what finally confirmed mt diagnoses. WI " C. Y. " <cjmy3454@...> wrote: Wow, such fun on the horizon. <Matsumura_Clan@...> wrote: Radiology, Vol 193, 375-382, Copyright © 1994 by Radiological Society of North America Lung changes in rheumatoid arthritis: CT findings M Remy-Jardin, J Remy, B Cortet, F Mauri and B Delcambre Department of Radiology, Hopital Calmette, Lille, France. PURPOSE: To evaluate lung changes in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors reviewed the computed tomographic (CT) scans from 84 patients with RA with a mean articular disease duration (+/- standard deviation) of 12 years +/- 8 (range, 0.3-45 years). Fifteen patients underwent sequential CT evaluation during 5-65- month follow-up (mean, 18 months). RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients (49%) had abnormal CT scans showing the following abnormalities: (a) bronchiectasis and/or bronchiolectasis (n = 23, 30%), ( pulmonary nodules (n = 17, 22%), © subpleural micronodules and/or pseudoplaques (n = 13, 17%), (d) nonseptal linear attenuation (n = 14, 18%), (e) areas of ground-glass attenuation (n = 11, 14%), and (f) honeycombing (n = 8, 10%). Abnormal CT examinations were recorded in 11 of 38 asymptomatic patients (29%) and 27 of 39 symptomatic patients (69%). The following CT abnormalities were found with a significantly higher frequency among patients with respiratory symptoms: (a) bronchiectasis and/or bronchiolectasis, ( rounded areas of attenuation, © areas of ground-glass attenuation, and (d) honeycombing. CONCLUSION: CT may be a useful noninvasive tool for recognition of RA-associated lung disease with special emphasis on bronchial and bronchiolar changes. http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/2/375 Not an MD I'll tell you where to go! Mayo Clinic in Rochester http://www.mayoclinic.org/rochester s Hopkins Medicine http://www.hopkinsmedicine.org Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 13, 2006 Report Share Posted February 13, 2006 Your Rheumy should learn some bedside manners. I was lucky, Dr. M. Elleman [university of Chicago, well-known in his field] diagnosed me on my first visit. Even though I was sero-negative and started me on methotrexate immediately. So far, nothing is getting worse and I am in pretty good shape.... at least for now. The man is brilliant, unfortunately, he retired. susan smith <bizzare48@...> wrote: I too have had all the systems for over five years and have been seeing a rheumy for most of the time, i also have Osteo quite bad in knees ankles and spine. But because I was seronegative it was so hard to get a diagnosis. I was taking Ra meds but still no definite diagnosis, until I got pneumonia again , 5Th time in last few years, and ended up in hospital and it was then discovered I had RA lung,Next time I saw my rheumy she said " Oh Shit " I started on humiria the next week! in WI " C. Y. " <cjmy3454@...> wrote: I am stil seronegative too but the symptoms are there, no mistake. I am holding my own for now.... while it lasts. To All: How have you been diagnosed with RA? SOme of you really are having a rough deal. susan smith <bizzare48@...> wrote: My Ra has been seronegative for four years now, my lung disease is what finally confirmed mt diagnoses. WI " C. Y. " <cjmy3454@...> wrote: Wow, such fun on the horizon. <Matsumura_Clan@...> wrote: Radiology, Vol 193, 375-382, Copyright © 1994 by Radiological Society of North America Lung changes in rheumatoid arthritis: CT findings M Remy-Jardin, J Remy, B Cortet, F Mauri and B Delcambre Department of Radiology, Hopital Calmette, Lille, France. PURPOSE: To evaluate lung changes in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors reviewed the computed tomographic (CT) scans from 84 patients with RA with a mean articular disease duration (+/- standard deviation) of 12 years +/- 8 (range, 0.3-45 years). Fifteen patients underwent sequential CT evaluation during 5-65- month follow-up (mean, 18 months). RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients (49%) had abnormal CT scans showing the following abnormalities: (a) bronchiectasis and/or bronchiolectasis (n = 23, 30%), ( pulmonary nodules (n = 17, 22%), © subpleural micronodules and/or pseudoplaques (n = 13, 17%), (d) nonseptal linear attenuation (n = 14, 18%), (e) areas of ground-glass attenuation (n = 11, 14%), and (f) honeycombing (n = 8, 10%). Abnormal CT examinations were recorded in 11 of 38 asymptomatic patients (29%) and 27 of 39 symptomatic patients (69%). The following CT abnormalities were found with a significantly higher frequency among patients with respiratory symptoms: (a) bronchiectasis and/or bronchiolectasis, ( rounded areas of attenuation, © areas of ground-glass attenuation, and (d) honeycombing. CONCLUSION: CT may be a useful noninvasive tool for recognition of RA-associated lung disease with special emphasis on bronchial and bronchiolar changes. http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/2/375 Not an MD I'll tell you where to go! Mayo Clinic in Rochester http://www.mayoclinic.org/rochester s Hopkins Medicine http://www.hopkinsmedicine.org Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.