Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Which came first, and false positive

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

OK, I'm not a doctor but I do consider myself to be well read especially on

the subject of RA and I would say your primary doctor has neurological

problems!! I'm amazed that you can even move.

I so am glad you're going to a rhumatologist.

Take Care

Babs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Hi,

I have been feeling signifcant pain for the past few weeks, shortly

after I noticed a sharp decrease in my ability to walk. It was three

years ago this December that I was diagnosed with OA in the

right hip. My walking declined slowly and recently picked up

pace, but I am feeling significant pain for the first time. Does the

disability usually precede the pain?

Rather than a one-to-ten scale for measuring pain, I measure

with three levels. I can ignore it completely and concentrate as if

nothing was wrong, or I can work around it, keeping it far enough

back in my thoughts to keep going, or I can't concentrate at all. I

reached level three several times during the past three weeks.

My Primary stated that my 167 RA factor was a false positive,

indicating neurological problems. I haven't any, though, and the

neurologist saw nothing odd about that number. I have pain

everywhere and can barely walk, and so far, Tramadol can bring

level three down to level two. My arms are stiff, raising them

hurts, and I seem to have pain in every joint. So, would this be

consistent with a 167 RA factor?

I'll be seeing a rheumy in two weeks. I'm on level two pain as I

write this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

It's good that you're going to a rheumy. He/she will be better able to

diagnose your problem. I've not heard of a positive RA factor

indicating neurological problems, but then I haven't heard of a lot of

things.

Let us know what the rheumy says.

Sue

On Wednesday, March 1, 2006, at 06:19 PM, alblau999 wrote:

> My Primary stated that my 167 RA factor was a false positive,

> indicating neurological problems. I haven't any, though, and the

> neurologist saw nothing odd about that number. I have pain

> everywhere and can barely walk, and so far, Tramadol can bring

> level three down to level two. My arms are stiff, raising them

> hurts, and I seem to have pain in every joint. So, would this be

> consistent with a 167 RA factor?

>

> I'll be seeing a rheumy in two weeks. I'm on level two pain as I

> write this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Sorry that you continue to experience so much pain and are still wondering

about your diagnosis.

Since you are seeing a rheumatologist pretty soon, I would just wait for his

or her opinion about what's going on.

Unfortunately, rheumatoid factor isn't specific to any one disease. When

your primary says " false positive, " he probably means that it's positive,

but not due to RA.

Not an MD

I'll tell you where to go!

Mayo Clinic in Rochester

http://www.mayoclinic.org/rochester

s Hopkins Medicine

http://www.hopkinsmedicine.org

[ ] Which came first, and false positive

> Hi,

> I have been feeling signifcant pain for the past few weeks, shortly

> after I noticed a sharp decrease in my ability to walk. It was three

> years ago this December that I was diagnosed with OA in the

> right hip. My walking declined slowly and recently picked up

> pace, but I am feeling significant pain for the first time. Does the

> disability usually precede the pain?

>

> Rather than a one-to-ten scale for measuring pain, I measure

> with three levels. I can ignore it completely and concentrate as if

> nothing was wrong, or I can work around it, keeping it far enough

> back in my thoughts to keep going, or I can't concentrate at all. I

> reached level three several times during the past three weeks.

>

> My Primary stated that my 167 RA factor was a false positive,

> indicating neurological problems. I haven't any, though, and the

> neurologist saw nothing odd about that number. I have pain

> everywhere and can barely walk, and so far, Tramadol can bring

> level three down to level two. My arms are stiff, raising them

> hurts, and I seem to have pain in every joint. So, would this be

> consistent with a 167 RA factor?

>

> I'll be seeing a rheumy in two weeks. I'm on level two pain as I

> write this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Hi,

Thanks for the reply. I'll report to the group when I see the

rheumatologist. No neurological problems were found, which is

good news. Isn't RA bad enough?

>

> > My Primary stated that my 167 RA factor was a false positive,

> > indicating neurological problems. I haven't any, though, and

the

> > neurologist saw nothing odd about that number. I have pain

> > everywhere and can barely walk, and so far, Tramadol can

bring

> > level three down to level two. My arms are stiff, raising them

> > hurts, and I seem to have pain in every joint. So, would this

be

> > consistent with a 167 RA factor?

> >

> > I'll be seeing a rheumy in two weeks. I'm on level two pain as

I

> > write this.

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Hi,

Thanks for the input. I'm rather glad that my primary checked for

neurological problems, especially since my family has a long

history of strokes. My thinking is, suppose I did have those

problems and hadn't been diagnosed until something really

disasterous happened? Better safe than sorry!

>

> OK, I'm not a doctor but I do consider myself to be well read

especially on

> the subject of RA and I would say your primary doctor has

neurological

> problems!! I'm amazed that you can even move.

> I so am glad you're going to a rhumatologist.

>

>

> Take Care

> Babs

>

>

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Hi,

Thanks, I am waiting for his input. My Primary believed that my

abnormal gait was neurological, but test proved that isn't so.

Anyway, I can still get around if I have to, but very slowly and

painfully. I guess I have one or more of the 100+ types of

arthritis, but I have fewer problems than most people here. So, I

should be among the last in this group to be worried about.

>

> Sorry that you continue to experience so much pain and are

still wondering

> about your diagnosis.

>

> Since you are seeing a rheumatologist pretty soon, I would just

wait for his

> or her opinion about what's going on.

>

> Unfortunately, rheumatoid factor isn't specific to any one

disease. When

> your primary says " false positive, " he probably means that it's

positive,

> but not due to RA.

>

>

>

> Not an MD

>

> I'll tell you where to go!

>

> Mayo Clinic in Rochester

> http://www.mayoclinic.org/rochester

>

> s Hopkins Medicine

> http://www.hopkinsmedicine.org

>

>

> [ ] Which came first, and false positive

>

>

> > Hi,

> > I have been feeling signifcant pain for the past few weeks,

shortly

> > after I noticed a sharp decrease in my ability to walk. It was

three

> > years ago this December that I was diagnosed with OA in

the

> > right hip. My walking declined slowly and recently picked up

> > pace, but I am feeling significant pain for the first time. Does

the

> > disability usually precede the pain?

> >

> > Rather than a one-to-ten scale for measuring pain, I

measure

> > with three levels. I can ignore it completely and concentrate

as if

> > nothing was wrong, or I can work around it, keeping it far

enough

> > back in my thoughts to keep going, or I can't concentrate at

all. I

> > reached level three several times during the past three

weeks.

> >

> > My Primary stated that my 167 RA factor was a false positive,

> > indicating neurological problems. I haven't any, though, and

the

> > neurologist saw nothing odd about that number. I have pain

> > everywhere and can barely walk, and so far, Tramadol can

bring

> > level three down to level two. My arms are stiff, raising them

> > hurts, and I seem to have pain in every joint. So, would this

be

> > consistent with a 167 RA factor?

> >

> > I'll be seeing a rheumy in two weeks. I'm on level two pain as

I

> > write this.

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

In a message dated 3/3/2006 1:24:45 AM Central Standard Time,

alblau999@... writes:

Hi,

Thanks, I am waiting for his input. My Primary believed that my

abnormal gait was neurological, but test proved that isn't so.

Anyway, I can still get around if I have to, but very slowly and

painfully. I guess I have one or more of the 100+ types of

arthritis, but I have fewer problems than most people here. So, I

should be among the last in this group to be worried about.

honey dont put yourself last in here. We all care about everyone. I feel the

same way sometimes...These are a great group of people that actually listen

when you speak. HUGS

julie from PA

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...