Guest guest Posted March 25, 2006 Report Share Posted March 25, 2006 The scan was to check on the " multiple nodules in both lungs " . I picked up the report from the records dept. I see the doctor next Wed and then get his take on it. The same nodules are there unchanged except that some are more prominent which the report said could be from the slicing of the x-ray meaning they may not have changed. Recommendation is to redo the scan in 6 months. The pulmonary doctor told me that if they were still there he would do further diagnostics. He said the lung biopsy was the least invasive procedure so I sure don't want anything more invasive. Unless he seems to have a very good reason for doing more now I will vote to wait 6 months. I view this as a good report. It would be better if it had shown the nodules were no longer there. BVan (Betty) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 26, 2006 Report Share Posted March 26, 2006 Betty, how big are the nodules? How else are they described in the report? Not an MD I'll tell you where to go! Mayo Clinic in Rochester http://www.mayoclinic.org/rochester s Hopkins Medicine http://www.hopkinsmedicine.org [ ] CT Scan results > The scan was to check on the " multiple nodules in both lungs " . I picked > up the report from the records dept. I see the doctor next Wed and then > get his take on it. > > The same nodules are there unchanged except that some are more prominent > which the report said could be from the slicing of the x-ray meaning they > may not have changed. Recommendation is to redo the scan in 6 months. > > The pulmonary doctor told me that if they were still there he would do > further diagnostics. He said the lung biopsy was the least invasive > procedure so I sure don't want anything more invasive. Unless he seems to > have a very good reason for doing more now I will vote to wait 6 months. > > I view this as a good report. It would be better if it had shown the > nodules were no longer there. > > BVan (Betty) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 26, 2006 Report Share Posted March 26, 2006 Gona. They are less than .5 mg and described as noncalcified, I have had asbestos exposure. The lung doctor says these are not typical asbestos , but I know asbestos damage can take many forms. About 18 months ago my daughter's husband died from asbestos exposure. My sister is now in advanced stage of asbestosis related problems. The pulmonary doctor said my cough was probably inflammatory. I don't know if I have posted this here or not. My complain was a cough that was such that I could not breathe. I have had coughs before that were allergy related so can easily understand it being inflammatory. So when I went to the Rheumatologist my complain was a cough. She was completely baffled at the idea that such would cause a cough. Several years ago she treated me for elevated sed rate. It did not respond to the medications she gave me. I can't remember why I quit seeing her. I sure wish I could remember. But that was why she said I have a high sed rate, but that is just the way it is. Because it has been elevated this long, it's normal for me, no problem. Looking at the 2 references you gave I do not know what to search for. BVan (Betty) [ ] CT Scan results > The scan was to check on the " multiple nodules in both lungs " . I picked > up the report from the records dept. I see the doctor next Wed and then > get his take on it. > > The same nodules are there unchanged except that some are more prominent > which the report said could be from the slicing of the x-ray meaning they > may not have changed. Recommendation is to redo the scan in 6 months. > > The pulmonary doctor told me that if they were still there he would do > further diagnostics. He said the lung biopsy was the least invasive > procedure so I sure don't want anything more invasive. Unless he seems to > have a very good reason for doing more now I will vote to wait 6 months. > > I view this as a good report. It would be better if it had shown the > nodules were no longer there. > > BVan (Betty) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 26, 2006 Report Share Posted March 26, 2006 , They are less than .5 mg and described as noncalcified, I have had asbestos exposure. The lung doctor says these are not typical asbestos, but I know asbestos damage can take many forms. About 18 months ago my daughter's husband died from asbestos exposure. My sister is now in advanced stage of asbestosis related problems. The pulmonary doctor said my cough was probably inflammatory. I don't know if I have posted this here or not. My complain was a cough that was such that I could not breathe. I have had coughs before that were allergy related so can easily understand it being inflammatory. So when I went to the Rheumatologist my complain was a cough. She was completely baffled at the idea that such would cause a cough. Several years ago she treated me for elevated sed rate. It did not respond to the medications she gave me. I can't remember why I quit seeing her. I sure wish I could remember. But that was why she said I have a high sed rate, but that is just the way it is. Because it has been elevated this long, it's normal for me, no problem. (HA) Anything you can add is appreciated. Seems it is necessary to know what the problem is and tell the doctor. Then you hope they listen. How could we survive without the net? BVan (Betty) [ ] CT Scan results > The scan was to check on the " multiple nodules in both lungs " . I picked > up the report from the records dept. I see the doctor next Wed and then > get his take on it. > > The same nodules are there unchanged except that some are more prominent > which the report said could be from the slicing of the x-ray meaning they > may not have changed. Recommendation is to redo the scan in 6 months. > > The pulmonary doctor told me that if they were still there he would do > further diagnostics. He said the lung biopsy was the least invasive > procedure so I sure don't want anything more invasive. Unless he seems to > have a very good reason for doing more now I will vote to wait 6 months. > > I view this as a good report. It would be better if it had shown the > nodules were no longer there. > > BVan (Betty) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 28, 2006 Report Share Posted March 28, 2006 Betty, how were you exposed to asbestos, when, and for how long? Not an MD I'll tell you where to go! Mayo Clinic in Rochester http://www.mayoclinic.org/rochester s Hopkins Medicine http://www.hopkinsmedicine.org Re: [ ] CT Scan results > , > > They are less than .5 mg and described as noncalcified, > > I have had asbestos exposure. The lung doctor says these are not typical > asbestos, but I know asbestos damage can take many forms. About 18 months > ago my daughter's husband died from asbestos exposure. My sister is now in > advanced stage of asbestosis related problems. > > The pulmonary doctor said my cough was probably inflammatory. I don't know > if I have posted this here or not. My complain was a cough that was such > that I could not breathe. I have had coughs before that were allergy > related so can easily understand it being inflammatory. So when I went to > the Rheumatologist my complain was a cough. She was completely baffled at > the idea that such would cause a cough. > > Several years ago she treated me for elevated sed rate. It did not respond > to the medications she gave me. I can't remember why I quit seeing her. I > sure wish I could remember. But that was why she said I have a high sed > rate, but that is just the way it is. Because it has been elevated this > long, it's normal for me, no problem. (HA) > > Anything you can add is appreciated. Seems it is necessary to know what > the problem is and tell the doctor. Then you hope they listen. How could > we survive without the net? > > BVan (Betty) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 28, 2006 Report Share Posted March 28, 2006 During World War 2 both my parents and 2 sisters worked in a shipyard. They were extensively exposed to asbestos and when they came home asbestos was in/on all their clothing. I have found that some have an asbestos problem from that sort of exposure. Of the 4 sited above one sister is the only one that it has showed up on and was identified. She does not yet have the cancer but both lungs are virtually destroyed. All my family except her has passed away. 2 sisters had ovarian cancer which I have seen reports that sometimes that could be asbestosis related. Early in the 1960's we lived in military temporary housing. The base was heated by steam produced as a by-product of the steam. There was extensive asbestos insulation that was not covered, just left sticking out. My 2 small children were there also. Those are the 2 main exposure sources I remember. When someone is into something that later becomes important it is difficult to recall them all. We had no idea that insulating materials were dangerous. I seriously doubt that my lung problems are asbestos related. When checking my lungs I told them about the asbestos. Betty Re: [ ] CT Scan results Betty, how were you exposed to asbestos, when, and for how long? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 6, 2010 Report Share Posted June 6, 2010 , NO need to be scared, there is very very tough bone separating ear and brain plus there are three layers over the brain to protect it. Outer one layer ( Dura) is very very strong, resist most of infection Be BRAVE to know what the pathology is,only then u will feel relieved. Dr. Arun Gupta, ENT Surgeon,India On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 3:33 AM, <moonshadow2447@...> wrote: 20 years ago I had surgery for a c-toma. The surgeon at the time believed he got all of it out. This year I started having some major issues...infections that won't go away, swelling, redness, the list goes on. I had a CT done the 25th of May and got the results 2 days ago after being discharged from the hospital. (I became very ill and was admitted through the ER on the 1st of June). They found a polyp 12mm by 9mm in the right maxillary sinus and some thickening was found in the left posterior maxillary sinus. I had a right mastoidectomy during the first surgery 20 yrs ago. The left mastoid is perfect. They also noted the right ossicles has some erosion along with portions of the stapes and the scutum. They are not sure if the 2 lesions they found in the scan are c-toma's or cholesterol granulomas. They said it was difficult to evaluate because of my mastoidectomy changes. They are suggesting a MRI to differentiate between c-toma and cholesterol granuloma. This sounds very scary to me. I am on high doses of antibiotics and steroids. I am on anxiety meds and pain pills. I feel sick all the time...I do not like the nausea feeling. I am scared but do not see the surgeon for 3 more weeks. Does anyone else relate to these symptoms and can you give me some advice on easing some of them. I am so scared of getting meningitis because the scan showed the lesions right on the outer shell of the brain lining...I am no doctor so I am not sure how concerned I should be if I should be at all for that matter. Anyone else out there with similar results?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.