Guest guest Posted November 12, 2006 Report Share Posted November 12, 2006 ACR/ARHP Annual Scientific Meeting 2006 Washington, DC November 10-15 Abstract Title: The Clinical Utility of Anti-CCP Antibodies in a Population Tested for RF: Impact of Including Anti-CCP in the Diagnostic Criteria for Early Rheumatoid Arthritis Category: 17. RA - clinical aspects Author(s): Rufus W. Burlingame1, Ana L. Bender2, A. von Muhlen2, Henrique L. Staub2, Ines G. de Silveira2. 1INOVA Diagnostics, Inc., San Diego, CA; 2Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul School of Medicine, Porto Alegre, Brazil Presentation Number: 330 Poster Board Number: 330 Purpose: To determine the clinical utility of anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (CCP) antibody in a population where RF was ordered. Both tests would likely be ordered together if anti-CCP antibody were included in the criteria to diagnose early rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Materials and Methods: Informed consent to test for anti-CCP was obtained from 1025 consecutive patients for whom rheumatoid factor (RF) was ordered at the University Central Hospital Laboratory. The RF requests originated from primary, secondary and tertiary centers. A diagnosis was obtained from the physicians without telling them the anti-CCP result. After exclusion criteria were applied, 768 patients composed the final study population. Results: In this group, 132 people (17%) were diagnosed with RA. The sensitivity for RA of anti-CCP was 62% while RF was 64% (Table I). Including patients who were positive for either test increased the sensitivity of the serologic tests to 71%. The specificity of anti-CCP was 97% compared to 90% for RF, while it was 99% when both were positive (Table I). Anti-CCP was statistically more specific than RF, while the difference in sensitivity was not significant. Patients who were positive for both serologic markers had a post-test probability of having RA of 86%, while RF yielded a 56% and anti-CCP a 79% post-test probability of having the disease. Likelihood ratios also favored anti-CCP over RF. Very low and very high levels of anti-CCP reactivity were very strongly associated with the absence and presence of RA, respectively. Discussion: This is the first study of anti-CCP in a population selected because an RF test was ordered. Including the anti-CCP results yielded increased diagnostic probabilities that are statistically better than RF alone in both early and established RA patients in this cohort. Thus, anti-CCP is a clinically useful test in the patient population where RF is ordered. 21% of the RF negative RA group, who are often difficult to diagnose, were anti-CCP positive. Only 22 of the non-RA patients were anti-CCP positive. Follow up studies on two groups of patients - those who are not diagnosed with RA but are positive for anti-CCP, and those who are diagnosed with RA but negative for both anti-CCP and RF - will yield further insight into the diagnostic as well as prognostic utility of anti-CCP. http://abstractsonline.com/viewer/viewAbstractPrintFriendly.asp?CKey={145452A4-8\ F67-4178-B921-DAC591AF1E59} & SKey={B3F82403-B1A4-46E5-9557-3DB49A84FCCA} & MKey={C2\ 97FAF7-2B4C-45F5-A662-0972E559ED7D} & AKey={AA45DD66-F113-4CDD-8E62-01A05F613C0D}'\ ,500,400) Not an MD I'll tell you where to go! Mayo Clinic in Rochester http://www.mayoclinic.org/rochester s Hopkins Medicine http://www.hopkinsmedicine.org Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.