Guest guest Posted February 2, 2002 Report Share Posted February 2, 2002 ----- Original Message ----- From: " ilena rose " <ilena@...> <Recipient List Suppressed:;> Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 7:11 PM Subject: Comments on the News that Dow is keeping the women's $$$$ intheir coffers even longer! > ~~~ If you've sent a comment that you would like posted ... please re-send > ... I'm beyond swamped! ~~~ > > > From: BDG148@... > Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 15:20:31 EST > Subject: Re: Check out Tort Claimants Committee > > Ilena I think it's time to reorganize w/ some political groups and get > this ball rolling and make Dow Chemical and Dow Corning pay for what > they've done instead of letting them off...Look at the things happening w/ > Enron..It's time to get everyone working on this..we all know they've > lied...and look at the enron employees wanting the govt to compensate them > for the $$ they've supposedly lost..I belong to some strong political > groups who might be willing to help with this..and, another thing, since > these people are trying to get money, which is mostly on paper, what's > going to be w/ the people in OKC who had family did from the bombing.. We > can't sit and let this happen.. This is all big business...and who's > behind the enron---bush and company....have you been following this? Lot > of facts are coming out...we can have the political groups work on this > with us because what DOW did is CRIMINAL. ALso, why hasn't the FDA been > sued?? Many women feel they should be held accountable also... Has anyone > contacted any BIG name attys to look into this? I think I'm going to > contact Dershowitz. Barbara > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > From: " ph Keegin " <lkeegin@...> > " ilena rose " <ilena@...> > Subject: Government Suing the plan and winning? > > Please Post Maybe my silicone brain is still not working properly, > but I still ask " how can the government be reinbursed for illnesses that > the plan does not recognize and neither does " The Dow " . Are only the > women with scleraderma (?spelling) or Lupus going to have to pay back > medicare? Since those are the only symptoms so far recognized. Call me > stupid, but how can you get reinbursed for something that they (the > government and all its agencies that we have been to) say there is " NO > CAUSATION " from silicone. > > Why are they the first ones with their hands out. Now I understand that > it will probably be another year before the women are paid. This > class-action case has become the biggest joke going. I have been involved > since 1992 and I for one am sick of these delay tactics that the DOW is > getting away with. Everyone keeps blaming the women for delaying this > process, but it is definitely the lawyers and the government. I am still > confused as to the women who voted " no " to the plan that was presented. I > thought you were either for or against the terms of the plan. I assumed > the majority ruled and the plan was adopted. > > Why should the " no " votes get penalized. That doesn't seem very > democratic. We did not " opt out " of anything we just took a vote. If > someone out there can clarify some of these issues, please post to all. > God Bless us all, especially to those women we lost while waiting for > justice. I am still out here willing to do anything to get this thing over > with. Please keep writing to congress, every letter counts. > > Lorraine in Cocoa Beach > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > From: KShear1525@... > Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 20:01:00 EST > Subject: Re: Dianna Pendleton of TCC responds to: Response to your question > to Pat Hug... > > What a shame, It makes me sick to think of another year of waiting and > wondering how many more will they be able to take off their list, I still > think we will never see a dime, just as they said at Dow that Day back in > 1990 > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > From: SWEETCAROLINELV@... > Subject: Re: Dianna Pendleton of TCC responds to: Response to your question > to Pat > > THAT IS JUST WHAT WE EXPECTED OUT OF THE TCC----the spin they put on it > shows their intent ---which was never to help the women they purported > to be helping -----they took the easy road and want now to confuse and > deny that it was their APPEAL of judge spector that caused this delay > -----read that ruling by the circuit ct. ---it says it doesnt see how > that release is justified in this case ---and trust me --the wording of > dow saying the release is essential to the plan is just a twisted way of > saying do it our way or we wont play ----now how does the company that > goes bankrupt MAKE ALL THE RULES ? ===tell me again why a company who > is rich and profitable --can be shielded from lawsuits this way ? what > did dow chemical do that makes them so lucky that they cant be made to > accept any responsibilty and get to hide behind this bankrupcy -? if > this gets done and the women are shafted by their own TCC I think we > need some better legal advice _____in the appeals it reads that the NO > votes cant be assured that they will get the same as they would if they > stayed in the bankrupcy or went to the litigation facility ----now I > THINK WE NEED TO HAVE ALL THE RULES IN PLAIN ENGLISH OF EXACTLY WHAT > THAT LITIGATION FACILITY WILL PROVIDE -----NO SPIN ---JUST THE FACTS > ----WE KNOW ITS CAPPED AND WE KNOW IT WILL BE ROUGH---AND DOW CAN USE > DAUBERT AND NOT TOO MANY ATTORNEYS WILL WANT TO TAKE CLIENTS THRU IT > ---CAN THE TCC tell the women that their expert (or dows) once said that > the highest estimate for the winning claim in the litigation facility > would be $12,000 ----TOPS ----now is that what the women and lawyers > will be fighting for ? the tcc has never come out and told the FACTS > about the womens chance of getting a decent claim approved nor have they > explained the litigation facility ----IN PLAIN ENGLISH FROM THE WOMANS > VIEW ----THE VICTIMS NEEDS ---AND HOW HARD IT WOULD BE ----MR HUGHS > NEVER DID ANSWER THE QUESTION " Will the women who win an amount in the > litigaion facility have to wait till all the cases are heard ===so if > the amounts won -EXCEED the $400 mill --(after attorneys all get theirs > ) then even their wins will be ratcheted -----NO ANSWER EVER GIVEN TO > THAT -----I DONT KNOW WHY THE WOMEN DONT START DEMANDING ANSWERS FROM > THE TCC CAUSE IF THEY DONT MAKE THEIR VOICES HEARD BEFORE THE THING GETS > FINALIZED IT WILL BE TOO LATE AND THEN ALL THAT CAN BE DONE IS CRY AND > SIGH -------ITS NOW THAT THE FACTS NEED TO BE UNDERSTOOD AND THE YES OR > NO VOTE BE UNDERSTOOD ----they use that percent all the time but if the > women get shafted by a vote they didnt understand then it was NOT A > TRUE VOTE ----AND ALL THAT WAS BETWEEN THE CLAIMANTS AND THE VOTE WAS > THE TCC=====this is the time to get the answers and let your voices be > heard ====NOT SPIN ----TRUE ANSWERS-----CAROLINE > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.