Guest guest Posted July 15, 2006 Report Share Posted July 15, 2006 Letter to Public Citizen from Dr. Galson at the FDA regarding Public Citizen's petition to have Arava withdrawn from the market March 23, 2004 http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/dailys/04/mar04/033104/02p-0139-pdn00001-vol1.p\ df Excerpt: " As your petition notes, Arava is quickly metabolized to M1 after oral administration. As explained in Arava's labeling, M1 has a long half-life (in general, approximately 2 weeks). You maintain that this long half-life contributes to Arava's toxicity (Petition at 14).18 Specifically, you assert that labeling suggesting that women should wait two years after Arava treatment before attempting to conceive " impl[ies] that there are body depots where [M1] remains for many months. " (Petition at 14) This contention is wrong. The two-year time period was calculated to reflect an extreme, worst-case scenario for drug elimination and does not represent a typical time period that M1 is likely to be retained. In fact, the two-year period exceeds the retention period that would be expected based on the longest half-life observed in Arava's population pharmacokinetics database; we lengthened the retention period expected based on the longest half-life observed to create an added margin of safety. Moreover, the two-year time period does not account for use of the enhanced drug elimination procedures recommended in Arava's labeling. As the labeling indicates, if these procedures are followed, M1 plasma levels can be sharply diminished below detectable levels within two weeks of Arava's discontinuation. This rapid diminishment belies your claim that M1 remains in body depots for many months. The elimination agents recommended in Arava's labeling (discussed below) interrupt the recycling (i.e., continued elimination and re-absorption) of M1 that occurs in the gastrointestinal tract. It is this recycling that accounts for M1's long half-life. If M1's half-life were attributable to its retention in body depots, the recommended elimination agents would not be expected to have much, if any, effect. You also claim that, because of its longer half-life, the average length of time required to attain steady-state plasma levels for M1 (10 to 12 weeks) is much longer than for methotrexate (1 to 2.5 days) (Petition at 14). You further contend that the time required to attain steady-state plasma levels reflects the time expected for a drug to disappear from the body once it is discontinued (Petition at 14). These contentions are misleading. The 10 to 12 week period you cite represents the average time expected to achieve steady-state M1 plasma levels in the absence of a loading dose. Because of M1's half-life, the Dosage and Administration section of Arava's labeling advises that therapy with this drug be initiated using a loading dose (one 100 mg tablet per day for three days) to expedite the attainment of steady-state concentrations.20 Similarly, as earlier noted, Arava's labeling recommends the use of enhanced elimination (i.e., washout) procedures to hasten the depletion of M1 plasma levels upon Arava's discontinuation. These procedures are further discussed below. " Not an MD I'll tell you where to go! Mayo Clinic in Rochester http://www.mayoclinic.org/rochester s Hopkins Medicine http://www.hopkinsmedicine.org Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.