Guest guest Posted November 26, 2006 Report Share Posted November 26, 2006 Risedronate Provides Better Earlier Fracture Protection Than Alendronate NEW YORK (Reuters Health) Nov 22 - Results of a retrospective study suggest that risedronate provides greater fracture protection in the first year of therapy than alendronate. Among 33,830 women aged 65 and older initiating once weekly risedronate or alendronate for the first time, researchers found that those taking risedronate (n = 12,215) had significantly lower rates of hip and nonvertebral fractures during the first year of therapy than those taking alendronate (n = 21,615). " The rapid onset of fracture reduction observed for risedronate in this study is consistent with results from randomized clinical trials of risedronate, " Dr. Pierre Delmas from Universite Claude Bernard, Lyon, France, notes in a statement accompanying the study published online November 17 in the journal Osteoporosis International. During 12 months of observation after the start of bisphosphonate therapy, there were 507 nonvertebral fractures and 109 hip fractures. During the first 3 months of therapy, the incidence of fracture was similar between the risedronate and alendronate cohorts. After 6 months of therapy, the risedronate cohort had a 46% lower incidence of hip fracture and a 19% lower incidence of nonvertebral fracture compared with the alendronate cohort. After 12 months of therapy, the risedronate cohort had a 43% lower incidence of hip fracture and an 18% lower incidence of nonvertebral fracture relative to the alendronate cohort. " These results do not appear to be explained by baseline differences in fracture risk between the two cohorts, " note the authors. " Thus it appears patients receiving risedronate are better protected from hip and nonvertebral fractures during their first year of therapy than patients receiving alendronate. " Four of the authors on the report have received consulting fees, lecture fees, or research grants from The Alliance for Better Bone Health (Procter and Gamble Pharmaceuticals and Sanofi-Aventis, while the fifth is an employee of Procter and Gamble. The two treatments were not compared with regard to side effects in this retrospective analysis. Osteoporos Int 2006. http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/548182 Not an MD I'll tell you where to go! Mayo Clinic in Rochester http://www.mayoclinic.org/rochester s Hopkins Medicine http://www.hopkinsmedicine.org Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.