Guest guest Posted December 19, 2006 Report Share Posted December 19, 2006 Interesting articles about Rituxan! Thanks for posting. The article I read today only said that the FDA's concern was for lupus patients -- it seems to be a good alternative for people with RA. And the people with lupus who were adversely affected by the drug may have had brain involvement due to the lupus. Take care, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 20, 2006 Report Share Posted December 20, 2006 , Thank you for all the interesting articles-very informative! Stacey --- <Matsumura_Clan@...> wrote: > Arthritis Rheum. 2006 May;54(5):1390-400. > > > The efficacy and safety of rituximab in patients > with active rheumatoid > arthritis despite methotrexate treatment: results of > a phase IIB randomized, > double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging > trial. > > > Academic Unit of Musculoskeletal Disease, Chapel > Allerton Hospital, Leeds, > UK. p.emery@... > > > OBJECTIVE: To examine the efficacy and safety of > different rituximab doses > plus methotrexate (MTX), with or without > glucocorticoids, in patients with > active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) resistant to > disease-modifying > antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), including biologic > agents. METHODS: A total of > 465 patients were randomized into 9 treatment > groups: 3 rituximab groups > (placebo [n = 149], 500 mg [n = 124], or 1,000 mg [n > = 192] on days 1 and > 15) each also taking either placebo glucocorticoids, > intravenous > methylprednisolone premedication, or intravenous > methylprednisolone > premedication plus oral prednisone for 2 weeks. All > patients received MTX > (10-25 mg/week); no other DMARDs were permitted. > RESULTS: Significantly more > patients who received 2 500-mg or 2 1,000-mg > infusions of rituximab met the > American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement > criteria (achieved an ACR20 > response) at week 24 (55% and 54%, respectively) > compared with placebo (28%; > P < 0.0001). ACR50 responses were achieved by 33%, > 34%, and 13% of patients, > respectively (P < 0.001), and ACR70 responses were > achieved by 13%, 20%, and > 5% of patients (P < 0.05). Changes in the Disease > Activity Score in 28 > joints (-1.79, -2.05, -0.67; P < 0.0001) and > moderate to good responses on > the European League Against Rheumatism criteria (P < > 0.0001) reflected the > ACR criteria responses. Glucocorticoids did not > contribute significantly to > the primary efficacy end point, ACR20 response at 24 > weeks. Intravenous > glucocorticoid premedication reduced the frequency > and intensity of first > infusion-associated events; oral glucocorticoids > conferred no additional > safety benefit. Rituximab was well tolerated; the > type and severity of > infections was similar to those for placebo. > > > CONCLUSION: Both rituximab doses were effective and > well tolerated when > added to MTX therapy in patients with active RA. The > primary end point > (ACR20 response) was independent of glucocorticoids, > although intravenous > glucocorticoid premedication improved tolerability > during the first > rituximab infusion. > > > PMID: 16649186 > > http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?itool=abstractplus & db=pubmed & cmd=R\ etrieve & dopt=abstractplus & list_uids=16649186 > > > > > > > > Not an MD > > I'll tell you where to go! > > Mayo Clinic in Rochester > http://www.mayoclinic.org/rochester > > s Hopkins Medicine > http://www.hopkinsmedicine.org > > > __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.