Guest guest Posted February 7, 2002 Report Share Posted February 7, 2002 ----- Original Message ----- From: " Ilena Rose " <ilena@...> <Recipient List Suppressed:;> Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 6:42 PM Subject: Future directions in breast implant surgery. > EXCERPT: The constant demand and pressure placed on the manufacturers to > keep developing new fillers are proof that satisfaction with saline > implants is lacking. > > > > http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov:80/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve & db=PubMed & list _uid > s=11727854 & dopt=Abstract > > > Clin Plast Surg 2001 Oct;28(4):687-702 > > Future directions in breast implant surgery. > > Goldberg P, Habal MB. > > Department of Material Sciences and Engineering Biomaterials Center, > University of Florida, Gainesville, USA. > Breast implant surgery will remain a major component of the practice of > plastic surgery. The future may hold promise for the introduction of new > implants for the augmentation of the breast and for reconstruction. The > constant demand and pressure placed on the manufacturers to keep > developing new fillers are proof that satisfaction with saline implants is > lacking. Today, however, the saline implant may be believed to be the > safest breast implant available for clinical application. The demand > necessitates that implants be used for enhancement of a woman's self image > and for reconstruction. > > The smooth-surface implants are considered more popular and safer for > patients, perhaps because it has been well documented that the shell may > have been the cause of the problem. However, the constancy in holding on > using and reapplying the same principles of a faulty shell may not be as > scientific an endeavor as we have done in the past, and to keep placing > different fillers in the faulty shell. Perhaps the lamination process used > in manufacturing, the air in the shell, or wear and tear produces > mechanical weakening of the shell that eventually will lead to loss of > integrity of the silicone-shell breast implant. > > The global community is looking to plastic surgeons for a solution. The > applications and the demand for breast implants are global in nature. > Meanwhile, as clinicians are waiting for a new implantable breast device, > they will continue to use what is available and advise patients that the > implantation of a breast prosthesis is not a life-long endeavor. > > There is a need, however, for the implants to be maintained by the process > of exchange every 8 to 10 years. Breast reaugmentation is to be performed > as a standard because plastic surgeons will be waiting for further > clarifications from the regulators or the scientific community. The goal > is to produce a good outcome and maintain safety for the patients with a > high standard of care. > > PMID: 11727854 [PubMed - in process] > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.