Guest guest Posted April 15, 2006 Report Share Posted April 15, 2006 It sounds like Professor Goswami is a faculty researcher, a technical journal editor, and the patent holder of the technology he is reviewing? Not uncommon these days but one wonders if one can be truly independent in the review when in multiple roles. The position of researcher has changed now that primary funding for university research comes from the private sector rather than government as it formerly did. NIH and others used to award funding for pure research. There is not much money available for that anymore and so the universities must turn to for-profit organizations for funding. The result has clearly been a trend is demonstration of technology-type research - far more limited than what produced scientific knowledge in the past. Sherryl Schultz, PhD, CIH, CSP Consultant OPTIMAL@... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 17, 2006 Report Share Posted April 17, 2006 You stated: "So now Steve, Stuart, who has the better credentials? You folks or a professor from India who is a most respected engineer and a leader in the ASME????? You guys really remind me of the Pope who had Galileo jailed for teaching the earth rotated around the sun and not the other way around. " Credentials place you in the ballpark. But just because he's a pitcher doesn't make him a good hitter. I've had ME professors that I wouldn't take their work without testing first - particularly where there research was narrowly focused ; had excellent ones too (Alma mater - Georgia Tech). Having said that: 1) India is much farther ahead on energy. 2) The EPA has tested photocatalytic oxidation (PCO) in the field with reasonable results through the SITES program 3) I have problems with the sales side (surprise - not) of PCO and on the use of other techniques with PCO to mask its poor value under certain conditions - I'll prepare something latter on on that. 4) I am looking to use PCO in an industrial application (similar to the scenario tested by EPA) Tony ........................................................................... "Tony" Havics, CHMM, CIH, PEpH2, LLCPO Box 34140Indianapolis, IN 46234 cell90% of Risk Management is knowing where to place the decimal point...any consultant can give you the other 10%℠This message is from pH2. This message and any attachments may contain legally privileged or confidential information, and are intended only for the individual or entity identified above as the addressee. If you are not the addressee, or if this message has been addressed to you in error, you are not authorized to read, copy, or distribute this message and any attachments, and we ask that you please delete this message and attachments (including all copies) and notify the sender by return e-mail or by phone at . Delivery of this message and any attachments to any person other than the intended recipient(s) is not intended in any way to waive confidentiality or a privilege. All personal messages express views only of the sender, which are not to be attributed to pH2 and may not be copied or distributed without this statement. OzoneLite Revisited or Who is Prof. Goswami Steve Temes, Stuart McCallum, OK you guys.... you just about had me convinced I'd lost my marbles.... but I kind of enjoy a challenge... so here goes... Yo'all have been making fun over my enthusiasm of the OzoneLite and the principle of photocatalytic oxidation and pooh poohed it in a dozen different ways. Then Jeff May referenced the medical journal "Lancet" and commented on a successful study in Montreal where UV energy was successfully demonstrated to significantly reduce a microbial situation. I took an interest in Jeff's comments as I've been aware that Canada has been considerably more innovative in its approach to bettering the environment. After all they have the strictest control on devices which use ozone ---- and that is a good thing--- as it has forced industry to develop alternate and more appropriate methods such as photocatalytic oxidation --- which generates next to no ozone and does greater job of disinfecting the environment. Well I obtained the full article Jeff had referenced and found it most interesting. I then did a search for similar past articles from this periodical and found from an issue two months after the 9-11 terrorist attack the following: "At a special session held on November 11—"Technology vs. Terrorism: Designing Against the Threat of Assault"—at ASME's International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition in New York City, eight technologists and safety experts talked about how some gee-whiz technology could very soon keep the world safer from terrorist attacks. For our sake, the technology cannot be implemented soon enough. Mechanical engineering professor D. Yogi Goswami spoke about a photocatalytic technology that destroys airborne bio-agents. Hightower, a Sandia engineer, told of a program to shield water supplies from terrorist attack." OK, if its good enough for the American Society of Mechanical Engineers its good enough for me. Then the name Goswami caught my eye as I had seen it mentioned somewhere before... Yes it was from the OzoneLite website. and then I remembered he was the professor who had something to do with the bulb... the photocatalytic process... and a couple of the patents. So who is Goswami?? It turns out he is a member of the board of directors of the ASME and then a quick search gave the following: "Dr. D. Yogi Goswami is a Professor of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering and Director of the Solar Energy and Energy Conversion Laboratory at the University of Florida. He is internationally known for his research in fundamental and applied areas of renewable energy. Dr. Goswami is the Editor-in-Chief of the Solar Energy international journal, and a prestigious annual publication in solar energy, Advances in Solar Energy: Annual Review of Research and Development. As an author or editor, he has published 8 books, 10 book chapters, 4 conference proceedings and more than 160 refereed technical papers. He also holds 5 US patents and 1 worldwide patent. He is a registered professional engineer. Dr. Goswami is a recognized leader in professional scientific and technical societies. At present, he is a Governor of ASME-International (2003-2006), and the President of the International Solar Energy Society (ISES, 2004-2005). In the past he has served as a Senior Vice President of ASME, Vice President of ISES and President of the International Association for Solar Energy Education (IASEE, 2000-2002).. He has also served as a Vice President for Energy Resources Board of ASME-International (1989-1993), Vice President of IASEE (1998-2000), a member of the Board of Directors of ISES (2000-2002) and a member of the Board of Directors of the American Solar Energy Society (ASES, 1996-2000). Dr. Goswami is a Fellow of the ASME International, and the American Solar Energy Society. He is a recipient of the Yellott Award for Solar Energy from ASME and the Greely Abbott award of the ASES, and more than 50 awards and certificates from major engineering and scientific societies. Dr. Goswami has chaired a number of task forces to advise the U.S. Congress and the federal administration on energy policy. He has given invited testimonies on energy policy matters to the US Congress and the United Nations. He has also chaired as Conference Chair or Technical Chair a number of International Conferences including the Intersociety Energy Conversion Engineering Conference (1988 and 1995), ASME International Solar Engineering Conference (1984 and 1987) and the ISES Solar World Congress (2005). He has delivered more than 20 Keynote and Plenary lectures at major International conferences. Dr. Goswami has served as an advisor on Energy matters to the US Government, Government of India and the World Bank. He has also worked as a consultant to the US Department of Energy, USAID, World Bank, NIST, and a number of electrical utilities, private corporations and universities in the world." It seems Dr. Goswami is an advocate of Solar Photocatalytic Detoxification and Disinfection of Water and Air. Although the potential of solar radiation for disinfection and environmental mitigation has been known for years, only recently has this technology been scientifically recognized and researched. Solar photocatalytic oxidation has been demonstrated to effectively treat groundwater, drinking water, and industrial wastewater In some applications such as decoloration and reduction of COD it may be the only effective method of treatment. And the good professor suggests: "Treatment of indoor air by the photocatalytic method has been demonstrated as the most effective technology for that application." So now Steve, Stuart, who has the better credentials? You folks or a professor from India who is a most respected engineer and a leader in the ASME????? You guys really remind me of the Pope who had Galileo jailed for teaching the earth rotated around the sun and not the other way around. In the words of the philosopher..... If you keep on doing what you've always been doing you'll keep on getting what you've always gotten....... And to Jeff May---- thank you for introducing me to the Lancet. Regards, Ken Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.