Guest guest Posted August 29, 2006 Report Share Posted August 29, 2006 Ann Rheum Dis. 2006 Aug 22; [Epub ahead of print] Combination therapy with sulphasalazine and methotrexate is more effective than either drug alone in rheumatoid arthritis (ra) patients with a suboptimal response to sulphasalazine: Results from the double blind placebo controlled mascot study. Capell H, Madhok R, Porter D, Munro R, McInnes I, Hunter J, M, Zoma A, on E, Sambrook M, Poon FW, Hampson R, Mc F, Tierney A, N, Ford I. Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, United Kingdom. BACKGROUND: Optimal use of disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is vital if progression of disease is to be reduced. Methotrexate (MTX) and sulphasalazine (SASP) are widely used inexpensive DMARDs, recently often combined despite no firm evidence of benefit from previous studies. Aims: To establish if a combination of sulphasalazine and methotrexate is superior to either drug alone in RA patients with a suboptimal response to six months of sulphasalazine. METHODS: Randomized controlled study of step-up DMARD therapy in early RA. Phase I: 687 patients received sulphasalazine for six months. Those with a disease activity score (DAS) >2.4 were offered additional therapy in Phase II (sulphasalazine alone, methotrexate alone or a combination of the two). Primary outcome measure was change in DAS. RESULTS: At 6 months 191 patients (28%) had a DAS <2.4, 123 (18%) were eligible but did not wish to enter Phase II, 130 (19%) stopped SASP because of reversible adverse events and 165 (24%) entered Phase II. DAS at 18 months was significantly lower in those who received combination compared with either sulphasalazine or methotrexate: monotherapy arms did not differ. Improvement in EULAR and ACR 20, 50 and 70 scores favoured combination therapy. CONCLUSIONS: In this inverted exclamation mark yentrue-to-life inverted exclamation mark| study an inexpensive combination of DMARDs proved more effective than monotherapy in RA patients with a suboptimal response to sulphasalazine. There was no increase in toxicity. These results provide an evidence base for the use of this combination as a component of tight control strategies. PMID: 16926184 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve & db=PubMed & list_uids=1\ 6926184 Not an MD I'll tell you where to go! Mayo Clinic in Rochester http://www.mayoclinic.org/rochester s Hopkins Medicine http://www.hopkinsmedicine.org Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 29, 2006 Report Share Posted August 29, 2006 Hi , I am allergic to sulfa. So if I ever get RA, does that mean I can't teke the sulphasalazine? Just curious. Debbie L > > Ann Rheum Dis. 2006 Aug 22; [Epub ahead of print] > > > Combination therapy with sulphasalazine and methotrexate is more effective > than either drug alone in rheumatoid arthritis (ra) patients with a > suboptimal response to sulphasalazine: Results from the double blind placebo > controlled mascot study. > > > Capell H, Madhok R, Porter D, Munro R, McInnes I, Hunter J, M, Zoma > A, on E, Sambrook M, Poon FW, Hampson R, Mc F, Tierney A, > N, Ford I. > > Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, United Kingdom. > > BACKGROUND: Optimal use of disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) > in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is vital if progression of disease is to be > reduced. Methotrexate (MTX) and sulphasalazine (SASP) are widely used > inexpensive DMARDs, recently often combined despite no firm evidence of > benefit from previous studies. Aims: To establish if a combination of > sulphasalazine and methotrexate is superior to either drug alone in RA > patients with a suboptimal response to six months of sulphasalazine. > METHODS: Randomized controlled study of step-up DMARD therapy in early RA. > Phase I: 687 patients received sulphasalazine for six months. Those with a > disease activity score (DAS) >2.4 were offered additional therapy in Phase > II (sulphasalazine alone, methotrexate alone or a combination of the two). > Primary outcome measure was change in DAS. RESULTS: At 6 months 191 patients > (28%) had a DAS <2.4, 123 (18%) were eligible but did not wish to enter > Phase II, 130 (19%) stopped SASP because of reversible adverse events and > 165 (24%) entered Phase II. DAS at 18 months was significantly lower in > those who received combination compared with either sulphasalazine or > methotrexate: monotherapy arms did not differ. Improvement in EULAR and ACR > 20, 50 and 70 scores favoured combination therapy. > > CONCLUSIONS: In this inverted exclamation mark yentrue-to-life inverted > exclamation mark| study an inexpensive combination of DMARDs proved more > effective than monotherapy in RA patients with a suboptimal response to > sulphasalazine. There was no increase in toxicity. These results provide an > evidence base for the use of this combination as a component of tight > control strategies. > > PMID: 16926184 > > http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi? cmd=Retrieve & db=PubMed & list_uids=16926184 > > > > > Not an MD > > I'll tell you where to go! > > Mayo Clinic in Rochester > http://www.mayoclinic.org/rochester > > s Hopkins Medicine > http://www.hopkinsmedicine.org > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 29, 2006 Report Share Posted August 29, 2006 If you have had a true allergic reaction to a sulfonamide in the past, it probably wouldn't be the best idea, Debbie, but your physician would make that call. Not an MD I'll tell you where to go! Mayo Clinic in Rochester http://www.mayoclinic.org/rochester s Hopkins Medicine http://www.hopkinsmedicine.org [ ] Re: RESEARCH - Combination therapy with sulfasalazine and MTX more effective than either alone in RA > Hi , > I am allergic to sulfa. So if I ever get RA, does that mean I can't > teke the sulphasalazine? Just curious. > > Debbie L Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.