Guest guest Posted December 16, 2006 Report Share Posted December 16, 2006 Well, there are probably a lot of things, but ... We know there is no cure. My understanding is that all they can do is treat symptons. You get a rash, treat the rash best you can. Once you get kidney problems, have dialysis and hope for the best. And so on throughout your life. But yet I've heard that thirty years, people usually died from lupus, but now they can be treated. I'm a little confused. What good is the treatment if it's just running after the damage as it continues? What good is a Lupus diagnosis if the best that can be done is to say, " Well, once it damages your lung, we'll do what we can, and if it ruins your kidneys, we'll do what we can " etc? I'm picturing Lupus sort of being like cancer, in that it just runs rampant destroying various parts of your body. But unlike cancer, there's nothing they can do to stop it. So it sounds like only a matter of time (and not much time) before my body is completely ravaged. Is this accurate?? I guess what my question boils down to is: Is there anything that can be done to prevent or lessen the actual destruction and damage on your tissues and organs? Or is the best they can do is try to treat the various damage after it happens? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.