Guest guest Posted May 19, 2006 Report Share Posted May 19, 2006 Arthritis Foundation Genetic Basis of Rheumatoid Arthritis Excerpt from the Primer on the Rheumatic Diseases, edition 12: Family studies and studies in monozygotic and dizygotic twins support the concept that genetic factors are important for the susceptibility of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, RA does not frequently aggregate in families and does not show a segregation pattern found in disorders of single- and high-penetrance genes. Many different genes, each of which makes only a small contribution to disease susceptibility, appear to be involved. Interactive genetic effects are suspected to modulate the impact of individual disease-risk genes and likely contribute to the low penetrance. Genetic risk factors not only determine susceptibility for the disease but also correlate with disease severity and phenotype, providing the unique opportunity to use genetic markers as prognostic tools in the management of RA. A measure used to estimate the genetic component to disease is the coefficient of familial clustering, as, defined as the ratio of the prevalence in affected siblings to the population prevalence. For RA, λs ranges from two to 12, depending on the published data set used. Although clearly supporting the influence of genetic factors, this λs is rather low compared with other autoimmune diseases or common genetic diseases, leaving considerable room for environmental or stochastic events in the pathogenesis of the disease. In part, λs may be rather low because RA is a heterogeneous syndrome that includes several genetically semi-homogeneous subsets. The genetic system studied most thoroughly is the major histocompatibility complex (MHC). In initial studies, RA was shown to be associated with human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DR4 (2). Studies of the HLA-D region’s genomic organization and of the molecular characterization of allelic polymorphisms are the basis for a model showing that the actual disease-conferring sequence is confined to a short sequence that encompasses amino acids 67-74 of the HLA-DRB1 gene (3). Comparing sequences of the disease-associated HLA-DRB1 alleles demonstrates sharing of a sequence motif in the third hypervariable region. Association studies in different ethnic populations support the concept that HLA-DRB1 alleles expressing this sequence motif are over-represented among people with RA (1). The sequence polymorphism is characterized by a glutamine or arginine at position 70, a lysine or alanine at position 71, and an alanine at position 74. Alleles with a negatively charged amino acid at any one of these positions are not associated with the disease. The disease-associated alleles include HLA-DRB1*0401, 0404, and 0408. Additional disease-associated alleles include HLA-DRB1*0101/2 mainly in the Caucasian population, HLA-DRB1*0405 in the Asian population, HLA-DRB1*1402 in some Native American populations, and HLA-DRB1*10 in the Greek population. Clinical-association studies have provided important information to lace these genes in the pathophysiology of the disease. In essence, evidence has been provided that HLA-DRB1 alleles modify disease expression. Patents with a disease-associated HLA-DRB1 allele different from HLA-DR4 often develop mild and seronegative disease (4). Disease severity also appears to be influenced by the Lys/Arg dimorphism at position 71 of the disease-associated HLA-DRB1 sequence stretch. Patients with severe joint disease and/or extra-articular manifestations have the strongest HLA-DRB1 association. These patients frequently express two disease-associated HLA-DRB1*04 alleles (5). Family studies have emphasized the importance of the second haplotype. Concordance rates in siblings who share both disease-associated MHC haplotypes are higher than in siblings who share only one haplotype. These data suggest that the disease-associated HLA-DRB1 alleles are important not only in disease initiation, but also in disease progression. Sequence polymorphisms within these alleles and gene-dose effects are important variables influencing the expression of RA. The data further suggest that these alleles act in concert with other MHC genes as well as background genes. Crystallographic studies of HLA-DR peptide complexes have mapped the conserved sequence stretch to an a helix that borders the antigen-binding cleft of the HLA-DR molecule (6). Side chains of the MHC molecules form pockets that interact with side chains of antigenic peptides, usually nine amino acids in length, thereby determining the peptide specificity of MHC binding. The polymorphic residues of the shared epitope form the pocket that interacts with the side chains of the fourth amino acid in the bound peptide. In particular, the positively charged amino acid at position 71 of the shared epitope favors the binding of peptides with a negatively charged amino acid. Amino acids of the shared epitope also can interact with the T-cell receptor (TCR) that recognizes the HLA-peptide complex. Depending on the peptide bound, the α-helical conformation is altered and the amino acid at position 70 points to the T-cell receptor. Based on this structural knowledge, three models for the function of disease-associated polymorphisms have been proposed: 1) selective binding of autoantigenic peptides; 2) selective binding of TCR molecules; and 3) the HLA molecule functioning as a peptide donor. In the first model, antigenic peptides with a negatively charged amino acid in the middle would be prone to trigger a disease-inducing T-cell response. One possible scenario is that peptides derived from pathogenetic microorganisms cross-react with autoantigens. It is likely that different antigenic peptides would be involved in different patients because the peptide-binding profiles of the different disease-associated HLA-DRB1 alleles are quite different, except for their preference for a negatively charged amino acid at position 4. However, it is unclear what aspect could be unique for a particular set of peptides. In the second model, the disease-associated sequence stretch would be involved by directly interacting with contact residues of the TCR. TCR--HLA-DR contact residues contribute to the affinity of the complex formation. The shared epitope could be involved in the selection of a particular set of T cells, either during T-cell repertoire formation in the thymus or by influencing T-cell survival in the periphery (7). In the third model, the disease-associated sequence would not function as a part of the entire HLA-DR molecule but as a peptide. HLA-derived peptides are recognized in the thymus and influence the selection of T cells. Positive selection of such T cells could result in a repertoire that is biased toward the recognition of cross-reactive microbial peptides (8). Molecular mimicry between the disease-associated sequence and bacterial heat-shock proteins has been described. The RA-associated HLA-DRB1 amino acid sequence, QKRAA, also is present in the bacterial heat-shock protein dnaJ, which is able to trigger proliferative responses of synovial-fluid T cells from RA patients. Although elegant, all three models have limitations in explaining how MGC genes influence the induction or progression of RA. Understanding the role of the HLA-DRB1 polymorphisms remains one of the major challenges, but also one of the best prospects, to define the etiology of RA. MHC genes are not the only germline-encoded genes influencing susceptibility to RA. Female sex clearly increases the risk, and female patients develop a different phenotype of the disease than do male patients. However, no sex-linked genes have been identified as disease-risk genes. Several consortiums have started genome-wide searches, using affected sibling pairs (9,10). In these studies, the role of the HLA region was evident and accounted for as λs of 1.7 (compared with a λs of two to 12 for the entire genetic load contributing to RA), suggesting that the λs of other susceptibility genes would be very small. Susceptibility regions have been proposed for chromosomes 1, 3, 8, and 18, which will require confirmation and further refinement by other investigators. Eventually, the candidate gene approach may be more sensitive for identifying risk genes, in particular when considering the heterogeneity of disease severity and phenotype. The recent definition of single nucleotide polymorphisms throughout the human genome has increased significantly the feasibility of this approach. Studies of TCR and immunoglobulin genes have not been revealing; several cytokine polymorphisms, including tumor necrosis factor (TNF-)-α and interferon (IFN)- γ were described to influence disease severity, but studies are needed to confirm this hypothesis. http://www.arthritis.org/conditions/diseasecenter/ra/ra_genetic.asp Not an MD I'll tell you where to go! Mayo Clinic in Rochester http://www.mayoclinic.org/rochester s Hopkins Medicine http://www.hopkinsmedicine.org Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.